Utility of BerEp4/calretinin and desmin/epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) dual immunocytochemical staining in effusion cytology
Abstract Background Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is typically diagnosed late during the disease. Earlier detection can increase the chance of effective therapy. Recurrent pleural effusions are the earliest symptoms displaying an array of cytomorphological changes from reactive atypia to malignancy. Dia...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2023-03-01
|
Series: | Cancer Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5353 |
_version_ | 1797866859211522048 |
---|---|
author | Anders Hjerpe Enes Demir Sulaf Abd‐Own Katalin Dobra |
author_facet | Anders Hjerpe Enes Demir Sulaf Abd‐Own Katalin Dobra |
author_sort | Anders Hjerpe |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is typically diagnosed late during the disease. Earlier detection can increase the chance of effective therapy. Recurrent pleural effusions are the earliest symptoms displaying an array of cytomorphological changes from reactive atypia to malignancy. Diagnosis is possible on effusion cytology by applying molecular and immunocytochemical markers, the main difficulty being when to suspect PM and to differentiate PM from metastatic adenocarcinoma and reactive mesothelial proliferations. Methods We evaluated the diagnostic performance of two immunocytochemical dual stains (BerEp4/Calretinin and Desmin/Epithelial Membrane Antigen (EMA)) on 149 ethanol‐fixed cytospin preparation as an initial step to solve the mentioned diagnostic difficulty. The immunocytochemical reactivity pattern was evaluated by two independent investigators. The final diagnosis corresponded to PM (n = 20), metastatic adenocarcinoma (n = 83), and mesotheliosis (n = 46) in these cases. Results Calretinin had 99% specificity and 98% sensitivity for indicating a mesothelial phenotype, while BerEp4 distinguished the adenocarcinoma cases with 98% specificity and 99% sensitivity. EMA displayed 96% specificity and 99% sensitivity in malignant cases, while Desmin without EMA present showed 99% specificity and 96% sensitivity for indicating benign mesothelial proliferation. Conclusions Interpretation of the four immunoreactions is improved when performed as dual stains. The dual staining is a useful tool in the initial handling of atypical effusions and guides the subsequent choice of antibody panels for more detailed subclassification of malignant effusions. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-09T23:32:08Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ad6393f5045944f28e28f4cf8e372480 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2045-7634 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-09T23:32:08Z |
publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Cancer Medicine |
spelling | doaj.art-ad6393f5045944f28e28f4cf8e3724802023-03-21T05:20:40ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342023-03-011255334534010.1002/cam4.5353Utility of BerEp4/calretinin and desmin/epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) dual immunocytochemical staining in effusion cytologyAnders Hjerpe0Enes Demir1Sulaf Abd‐Own2Katalin Dobra3Division of Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenFaculty of Medicine Eskisehir Osmangazi University Eskisehir TurkeyDivision of Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenDivision of Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenAbstract Background Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is typically diagnosed late during the disease. Earlier detection can increase the chance of effective therapy. Recurrent pleural effusions are the earliest symptoms displaying an array of cytomorphological changes from reactive atypia to malignancy. Diagnosis is possible on effusion cytology by applying molecular and immunocytochemical markers, the main difficulty being when to suspect PM and to differentiate PM from metastatic adenocarcinoma and reactive mesothelial proliferations. Methods We evaluated the diagnostic performance of two immunocytochemical dual stains (BerEp4/Calretinin and Desmin/Epithelial Membrane Antigen (EMA)) on 149 ethanol‐fixed cytospin preparation as an initial step to solve the mentioned diagnostic difficulty. The immunocytochemical reactivity pattern was evaluated by two independent investigators. The final diagnosis corresponded to PM (n = 20), metastatic adenocarcinoma (n = 83), and mesotheliosis (n = 46) in these cases. Results Calretinin had 99% specificity and 98% sensitivity for indicating a mesothelial phenotype, while BerEp4 distinguished the adenocarcinoma cases with 98% specificity and 99% sensitivity. EMA displayed 96% specificity and 99% sensitivity in malignant cases, while Desmin without EMA present showed 99% specificity and 96% sensitivity for indicating benign mesothelial proliferation. Conclusions Interpretation of the four immunoreactions is improved when performed as dual stains. The dual staining is a useful tool in the initial handling of atypical effusions and guides the subsequent choice of antibody panels for more detailed subclassification of malignant effusions.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5353cytologydiagnosisdual stainimmunocytochemistrymesothelioma |
spellingShingle | Anders Hjerpe Enes Demir Sulaf Abd‐Own Katalin Dobra Utility of BerEp4/calretinin and desmin/epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) dual immunocytochemical staining in effusion cytology Cancer Medicine cytology diagnosis dual stain immunocytochemistry mesothelioma |
title | Utility of BerEp4/calretinin and desmin/epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) dual immunocytochemical staining in effusion cytology |
title_full | Utility of BerEp4/calretinin and desmin/epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) dual immunocytochemical staining in effusion cytology |
title_fullStr | Utility of BerEp4/calretinin and desmin/epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) dual immunocytochemical staining in effusion cytology |
title_full_unstemmed | Utility of BerEp4/calretinin and desmin/epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) dual immunocytochemical staining in effusion cytology |
title_short | Utility of BerEp4/calretinin and desmin/epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) dual immunocytochemical staining in effusion cytology |
title_sort | utility of berep4 calretinin and desmin epithelial membrane antigen ema dual immunocytochemical staining in effusion cytology |
topic | cytology diagnosis dual stain immunocytochemistry mesothelioma |
url | https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5353 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andershjerpe utilityofberep4calretininanddesminepithelialmembraneantigenemadualimmunocytochemicalstainingineffusioncytology AT enesdemir utilityofberep4calretininanddesminepithelialmembraneantigenemadualimmunocytochemicalstainingineffusioncytology AT sulafabdown utilityofberep4calretininanddesminepithelialmembraneantigenemadualimmunocytochemicalstainingineffusioncytology AT katalindobra utilityofberep4calretininanddesminepithelialmembraneantigenemadualimmunocytochemicalstainingineffusioncytology |