Mind the gap: what explains the rural-nonrural inequality in diarrhoea among under-five children in low and medium-income countries? A decomposition analysis

Abstract Background Diarrhoea poses serious health problems among under-five children (U5C) in Low-and Medium-Income Countries (LMIC) with a higher prevalence in rural areas. A gap exists in knowledge on factors driving rural-non-rural inequalities in diarrhoea development among U5C in LMIC. This st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. F. Fagbamigbe, F. F. Oyinlola, O. M. Morakinyo, A. S. Adebowale, O. S. Fagbamigbe, A. O. Uthman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-03-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10615-0
_version_ 1818415576009146368
author A. F. Fagbamigbe
F. F. Oyinlola
O. M. Morakinyo
A. S. Adebowale
O. S. Fagbamigbe
A. O. Uthman
author_facet A. F. Fagbamigbe
F. F. Oyinlola
O. M. Morakinyo
A. S. Adebowale
O. S. Fagbamigbe
A. O. Uthman
author_sort A. F. Fagbamigbe
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Diarrhoea poses serious health problems among under-five children (U5C) in Low-and Medium-Income Countries (LMIC) with a higher prevalence in rural areas. A gap exists in knowledge on factors driving rural-non-rural inequalities in diarrhoea development among U5C in LMIC. This study investigates the magnitude of rural-non-rural inequalities in diarrhoea and the roles of individual-level and neighbourhood-level factors in explaining these inequalities. Methods Data of 796,150 U5C, from 63,378 neighbourhoods across 57 LMIC from the most recent Demographic and Health Survey (2010–2018) was analysed. The outcome variable was the recent experience of diarrhoea while independent variables consist of the individual- and neighbourhood-level factors. Data were analysed using multivariable Fairlie decomposition at p < 0.05 in Stata Version 16 while visualization was implemented in R Statistical Package. Results Two-thirds (68.0%) of the children are from rural areas. The overall prevalence of diarrhoea was 14.2, 14.6% vs 13.4% among rural and non-rural children respectively (p < 0.001). From the analysis, the following 20 countries showed a statistically significant pro-rural inequalities with higher odds of diarrhoea in rural areas than in nonrural areas at 5% alpha level: Albania (OR = 1.769; p = 0.001), Benin (OR = 1.209; p = 0.002), Burundi (OR = 1.399; p < 0.001), Cambodia (OR = 1.201; p < 0.031), Cameroon (OR = 1.377; p < 0.001), Comoros (OR = 1.266; p = 0.029), Egypt (OR = 1.331; p < 0.001), Honduras (OR = 1.127; p = 0.027), India (OR = 1.059; p < 0.001), Indonesia (OR = 1.219; p < 0.001), Liberia (OR = 1.158; p = 0.017), Mali (OR = 1.240; p = 0.001), Myanmar (OR = 1.422; p = 0.004), Namibia (OR = 1.451; p < 0.001), Nigeria (OR = 1.492; p < 0.001), Rwanda (OR = 1.261; p = 0.010), South Africa (OR = 1.420; p = 0.002), Togo (OR = 1.729; p < 0.001), Uganda (OR = 1.214; p < 0.001), and Yemen (OR = 1.249; p < 0.001); and pro-non-rural inequalities in 9 countries. Variations exist in factors associated with pro-rural inequalities across the 20 countries. Overall main contributors to pro-rural inequality were neighbourhood socioeconomic status, household wealth status, media access, toilet types, maternal age and education. Conclusions The gaps in the odds of diarrhoea among rural children than nonrural children were explained by individual-level and neighbourhood-level factors. Sustainable intervention measures that are tailored to country-specific needs could offer a better approach to closing rural-non-rural gaps in having diarrhoea among U5C in LMIC.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T11:37:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ad6bd819bd5544d4bbe4b749294c3a29
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T11:37:11Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-ad6bd819bd5544d4bbe4b749294c3a292022-12-21T23:02:58ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582021-03-0121111510.1186/s12889-021-10615-0Mind the gap: what explains the rural-nonrural inequality in diarrhoea among under-five children in low and medium-income countries? A decomposition analysisA. F. Fagbamigbe0F. F. Oyinlola1O. M. Morakinyo2A. S. Adebowale3O. S. Fagbamigbe4A. O. Uthman5Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of IbadanDepartment of Demography and Social Statistics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo UniversityDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of IbadanDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of IbadanTechmodiaDivision of Health Sciences, Populations, Evidence and Technologies Group, Warwick Medical School, University of WarwickAbstract Background Diarrhoea poses serious health problems among under-five children (U5C) in Low-and Medium-Income Countries (LMIC) with a higher prevalence in rural areas. A gap exists in knowledge on factors driving rural-non-rural inequalities in diarrhoea development among U5C in LMIC. This study investigates the magnitude of rural-non-rural inequalities in diarrhoea and the roles of individual-level and neighbourhood-level factors in explaining these inequalities. Methods Data of 796,150 U5C, from 63,378 neighbourhoods across 57 LMIC from the most recent Demographic and Health Survey (2010–2018) was analysed. The outcome variable was the recent experience of diarrhoea while independent variables consist of the individual- and neighbourhood-level factors. Data were analysed using multivariable Fairlie decomposition at p < 0.05 in Stata Version 16 while visualization was implemented in R Statistical Package. Results Two-thirds (68.0%) of the children are from rural areas. The overall prevalence of diarrhoea was 14.2, 14.6% vs 13.4% among rural and non-rural children respectively (p < 0.001). From the analysis, the following 20 countries showed a statistically significant pro-rural inequalities with higher odds of diarrhoea in rural areas than in nonrural areas at 5% alpha level: Albania (OR = 1.769; p = 0.001), Benin (OR = 1.209; p = 0.002), Burundi (OR = 1.399; p < 0.001), Cambodia (OR = 1.201; p < 0.031), Cameroon (OR = 1.377; p < 0.001), Comoros (OR = 1.266; p = 0.029), Egypt (OR = 1.331; p < 0.001), Honduras (OR = 1.127; p = 0.027), India (OR = 1.059; p < 0.001), Indonesia (OR = 1.219; p < 0.001), Liberia (OR = 1.158; p = 0.017), Mali (OR = 1.240; p = 0.001), Myanmar (OR = 1.422; p = 0.004), Namibia (OR = 1.451; p < 0.001), Nigeria (OR = 1.492; p < 0.001), Rwanda (OR = 1.261; p = 0.010), South Africa (OR = 1.420; p = 0.002), Togo (OR = 1.729; p < 0.001), Uganda (OR = 1.214; p < 0.001), and Yemen (OR = 1.249; p < 0.001); and pro-non-rural inequalities in 9 countries. Variations exist in factors associated with pro-rural inequalities across the 20 countries. Overall main contributors to pro-rural inequality were neighbourhood socioeconomic status, household wealth status, media access, toilet types, maternal age and education. Conclusions The gaps in the odds of diarrhoea among rural children than nonrural children were explained by individual-level and neighbourhood-level factors. Sustainable intervention measures that are tailored to country-specific needs could offer a better approach to closing rural-non-rural gaps in having diarrhoea among U5C in LMIC.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10615-0DiarrhoeaRural-non-rural inequalitiesDecompositionFairlie multivariable decompositionLow- and middle-income countries
spellingShingle A. F. Fagbamigbe
F. F. Oyinlola
O. M. Morakinyo
A. S. Adebowale
O. S. Fagbamigbe
A. O. Uthman
Mind the gap: what explains the rural-nonrural inequality in diarrhoea among under-five children in low and medium-income countries? A decomposition analysis
BMC Public Health
Diarrhoea
Rural-non-rural inequalities
Decomposition
Fairlie multivariable decomposition
Low- and middle-income countries
title Mind the gap: what explains the rural-nonrural inequality in diarrhoea among under-five children in low and medium-income countries? A decomposition analysis
title_full Mind the gap: what explains the rural-nonrural inequality in diarrhoea among under-five children in low and medium-income countries? A decomposition analysis
title_fullStr Mind the gap: what explains the rural-nonrural inequality in diarrhoea among under-five children in low and medium-income countries? A decomposition analysis
title_full_unstemmed Mind the gap: what explains the rural-nonrural inequality in diarrhoea among under-five children in low and medium-income countries? A decomposition analysis
title_short Mind the gap: what explains the rural-nonrural inequality in diarrhoea among under-five children in low and medium-income countries? A decomposition analysis
title_sort mind the gap what explains the rural nonrural inequality in diarrhoea among under five children in low and medium income countries a decomposition analysis
topic Diarrhoea
Rural-non-rural inequalities
Decomposition
Fairlie multivariable decomposition
Low- and middle-income countries
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10615-0
work_keys_str_mv AT affagbamigbe mindthegapwhatexplainstheruralnonruralinequalityindiarrhoeaamongunderfivechildreninlowandmediumincomecountriesadecompositionanalysis
AT ffoyinlola mindthegapwhatexplainstheruralnonruralinequalityindiarrhoeaamongunderfivechildreninlowandmediumincomecountriesadecompositionanalysis
AT ommorakinyo mindthegapwhatexplainstheruralnonruralinequalityindiarrhoeaamongunderfivechildreninlowandmediumincomecountriesadecompositionanalysis
AT asadebowale mindthegapwhatexplainstheruralnonruralinequalityindiarrhoeaamongunderfivechildreninlowandmediumincomecountriesadecompositionanalysis
AT osfagbamigbe mindthegapwhatexplainstheruralnonruralinequalityindiarrhoeaamongunderfivechildreninlowandmediumincomecountriesadecompositionanalysis
AT aouthman mindthegapwhatexplainstheruralnonruralinequalityindiarrhoeaamongunderfivechildreninlowandmediumincomecountriesadecompositionanalysis