Are patient decision aids effective? Insight from revisiting the debate between correspondence and coherence theories of judgment
Research endeavors to determine the effectiveness of patient decision aids (PtDAs) have yielded mixed results. The conflicting evaluations are largely due to the different metrics used to assess the validity of judgments made using PtDAs. The different approaches can be characterized by Hammond'...
Main Authors: | Victoria A. Shaffer, Lukas Hulsey |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2009-03-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/ccsh/ccsh.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Are patient decision aids effective? Insight from revisiting the debate between correspondence and coherence theories of judgment
by: Victoria A. Shaffer, et al.
Published: (2009-03-01) -
Searching for coherence in a correspondence world
by: Kathleen L. Mosier, et al.
Published: (2009-03-01) -
Searching for coherence in a correspondence world
by: Kathleen L. Mosier
Published: (2009-03-01) -
Coherence and correspondence in medicine
by: Thomas G. Tape, et al.
Published: (2009-03-01) -
Coherence and correspondence in engineering design: informing the conversation and connecting with judgment and decision-making research
by: Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos, et al.
Published: (2009-03-01)