Comparison of the hemocompatibility of neurovascular flow diverters with anti-thrombogenic coatings

Despite the continual progress in technology, thromboembolic complications still occur following endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms and remain the primary contributor to morbidity and mortality. Thus, coating the surfaces of blood-contacting flow diverters may reduce thrombus-related compl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Melis Güler Girbas, Tomáš Riedel, Zuzana Riedelová, Melanie Wolf, Christian Schlensak, Meltem Avci-Adali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-03-01
Series:Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468217923001351
_version_ 1797301408101302272
author Melis Güler Girbas
Tomáš Riedel
Zuzana Riedelová
Melanie Wolf
Christian Schlensak
Meltem Avci-Adali
author_facet Melis Güler Girbas
Tomáš Riedel
Zuzana Riedelová
Melanie Wolf
Christian Schlensak
Meltem Avci-Adali
author_sort Melis Güler Girbas
collection DOAJ
description Despite the continual progress in technology, thromboembolic complications still occur following endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms and remain the primary contributor to morbidity and mortality. Thus, coating the surfaces of blood-contacting flow diverters may reduce thrombus-related complications in clinical use. In this study, the hemocompatibility of different commercially available flow diverters Pipeline Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology (Medtronic), the p64 MW HPC (Phenox), and the DERIVO 2heal (Acandis) was investigated using an in vitro blood circulation model. The DERIVO 2 flow diverter was included in this study as an uncoated device. The markers of coagulation (thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT)), thrombocytes (β-thromboglobulin (β-TG)), inflammation (PMN elastase), and complement system (SC5b-9, C3a, and C5a) activation were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In addition to blood cell counts and hemolysis, thrombogenicity was determined using scanning electron microscopy. Flow diverters with anti-thrombogenic coatings resulted in significantly lower activation of coagulation (TAT) and platelets (β-TG) and lower adhesion of platelets compared with the uncoated DERIVO 2 flow diverter. There were no significant differences between the coated flow diverters in terms of TAT and β-TG levels, as well as platelet adhesion. However, significantly lower activation of the complement system (SC5b-9 and C5a) was observed for the DERIVO 2heal flow diverter in comparison with the Pipeline Flex Shield and the p64 MW HPC flow diverters emphasizing the improved hemocompatibility of the fibrin/heparin-coated DERIVO 2heal flow diverter.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T23:22:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ad9a83a7428b459f9deeb1d90f07c7f6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2468-2179
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T23:22:06Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices
spelling doaj.art-ad9a83a7428b459f9deeb1d90f07c7f62024-02-21T05:29:30ZengElsevierJournal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices2468-21792024-03-0191100666Comparison of the hemocompatibility of neurovascular flow diverters with anti-thrombogenic coatingsMelis Güler Girbas0Tomáš Riedel1Zuzana Riedelová2Melanie Wolf3Christian Schlensak4Meltem Avci-Adali5University Hospital Tuebingen, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Calwerstraße 7/1, 72076, Tuebingen, GermanyInstitute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Department of Chemistry and Physics of Surfaces and Biointerfaces, Heyrovského nám. 2, 162 06, Prague 6, Czech RepublicInstitute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Department of Chemistry and Physics of Surfaces and Biointerfaces, Heyrovského nám. 2, 162 06, Prague 6, Czech RepublicUniversity Hospital Tuebingen, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Calwerstraße 7/1, 72076, Tuebingen, GermanyUniversity Hospital Tuebingen, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Calwerstraße 7/1, 72076, Tuebingen, GermanyUniversity Hospital Tuebingen, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Calwerstraße 7/1, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany; Corresponding author. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Tuebingen, Calwerstr. 7/1, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.Despite the continual progress in technology, thromboembolic complications still occur following endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms and remain the primary contributor to morbidity and mortality. Thus, coating the surfaces of blood-contacting flow diverters may reduce thrombus-related complications in clinical use. In this study, the hemocompatibility of different commercially available flow diverters Pipeline Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology (Medtronic), the p64 MW HPC (Phenox), and the DERIVO 2heal (Acandis) was investigated using an in vitro blood circulation model. The DERIVO 2 flow diverter was included in this study as an uncoated device. The markers of coagulation (thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT)), thrombocytes (β-thromboglobulin (β-TG)), inflammation (PMN elastase), and complement system (SC5b-9, C3a, and C5a) activation were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In addition to blood cell counts and hemolysis, thrombogenicity was determined using scanning electron microscopy. Flow diverters with anti-thrombogenic coatings resulted in significantly lower activation of coagulation (TAT) and platelets (β-TG) and lower adhesion of platelets compared with the uncoated DERIVO 2 flow diverter. There were no significant differences between the coated flow diverters in terms of TAT and β-TG levels, as well as platelet adhesion. However, significantly lower activation of the complement system (SC5b-9 and C5a) was observed for the DERIVO 2heal flow diverter in comparison with the Pipeline Flex Shield and the p64 MW HPC flow diverters emphasizing the improved hemocompatibility of the fibrin/heparin-coated DERIVO 2heal flow diverter.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468217923001351Intracranial aneurysmsFlow diverterThrombosisHemocompatibility
spellingShingle Melis Güler Girbas
Tomáš Riedel
Zuzana Riedelová
Melanie Wolf
Christian Schlensak
Meltem Avci-Adali
Comparison of the hemocompatibility of neurovascular flow diverters with anti-thrombogenic coatings
Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices
Intracranial aneurysms
Flow diverter
Thrombosis
Hemocompatibility
title Comparison of the hemocompatibility of neurovascular flow diverters with anti-thrombogenic coatings
title_full Comparison of the hemocompatibility of neurovascular flow diverters with anti-thrombogenic coatings
title_fullStr Comparison of the hemocompatibility of neurovascular flow diverters with anti-thrombogenic coatings
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the hemocompatibility of neurovascular flow diverters with anti-thrombogenic coatings
title_short Comparison of the hemocompatibility of neurovascular flow diverters with anti-thrombogenic coatings
title_sort comparison of the hemocompatibility of neurovascular flow diverters with anti thrombogenic coatings
topic Intracranial aneurysms
Flow diverter
Thrombosis
Hemocompatibility
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468217923001351
work_keys_str_mv AT melisgulergirbas comparisonofthehemocompatibilityofneurovascularflowdiverterswithantithrombogeniccoatings
AT tomasriedel comparisonofthehemocompatibilityofneurovascularflowdiverterswithantithrombogeniccoatings
AT zuzanariedelova comparisonofthehemocompatibilityofneurovascularflowdiverterswithantithrombogeniccoatings
AT melaniewolf comparisonofthehemocompatibilityofneurovascularflowdiverterswithantithrombogeniccoatings
AT christianschlensak comparisonofthehemocompatibilityofneurovascularflowdiverterswithantithrombogeniccoatings
AT meltemavciadali comparisonofthehemocompatibilityofneurovascularflowdiverterswithantithrombogeniccoatings