A Critical Review of Judgment No.708 of the Supreme Court
Ambiguous of legal provisions need to be interpreted by the courts and legal institutions, including the Supreme Court. But this kind of interpretations should not be limited to formal interpretation without any regard to nature of legal relations. Because of the fact that it makes some problems in...
Main Author: | Mortaza Hajipour |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Semnan University
2017-12-01
|
Series: | مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://feqh.semnan.ac.ir/article_2773_bd97c80187f817c5975b9ab1fc5fa67f.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Privacy and the Indian Supreme Court
by: Adeel Hussain -
A Theory of Supreme Court Nominations
by: Stewart, Charles, et al.
Published: (2005) -
Slovenia's Supreme Court rejects the European Court of Human Rights
by: Matej Avbelj -
The Analysis of Article 22 of the Family Protection Law (Adopted in 1391) in Case of Insolvency and of the Husband According to the Law and the Method of Implementing Financial Sentences (Adopted in 1394)
by: hossein kaviar, et al.
Published: (2016-02-01) -
Open Court Principle for The Public in Material Judicial Review Right in The Supreme Court
by: Andryan Andryan
Published: (2022-09-01)