Evaluation of internal contradictions and innovations of Mulla Sadra's primary matter

Regarding the philosophical view of Shirazi, a persistent question is whether the efforts of Shiite thinkers in the use of different schools of thought, the knowledge coherent for him to be brought or the adaptations frequent votes of inconsistent from view, the combination of ideas led Is? Of cours...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mahmoud Hedayatafza
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press 2017-09-01
Series:حکمت و فلسفه
Subjects:
Online Access:https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_8068_271b1964d53a07bdf26e388ab1aa5484.pdf
Description
Summary:Regarding the philosophical view of Shirazi, a persistent question is whether the efforts of Shiite thinkers in the use of different schools of thought, the knowledge coherent for him to be brought or the adaptations frequent votes of inconsistent from view, the combination of ideas led Is? Of course, the surest way to reach the answer to evaluate each of the issues raised in transcendental philosophy, especially the issues that they claim Sadra innovation.In this context, the present article aims to examine what different Sadra on the "primary matter" is the owner of Asfar, while acknowledging the composition of the concrete body of matter and form, stating extensively to defend the idea of Peripatetic philosophers of external realization monster as it lacks only the ability to act and turns around and look for the critics, especially Hakim Suhrawardi's philosophical position is, but he described some of the primary matter, like a special statement on the implications of Suhrawardi. The lawsuit innovation Mulla Sadra on the composition of the union of matter and form and promises to delight in Monster, respectively, to the works of philosophers Ikhwan al-Safa and the essay "Ashaq" Bu-Ali denied the innovation Sadra these problems limited to some explanation and He is considered new arguments.
ISSN:1735-3238
2476-6038