Calculation of the knee joint force at deep squatting and kneeling

The objective of this study is to calculate the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral forces at deep squatting and kneeling including seiza, which is the Japanese sedentary sitting. These postures are usually seen in daily life, especially in Japan or some regions in Asia or Arab. Thus it is expected to d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michihiko FUKUNAGA, Kentaro MORIMOTO
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers 2015-11-01
Series:Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jbse/10/4/10_15-00452/_pdf/-char/en
_version_ 1811224014628061184
author Michihiko FUKUNAGA
Kentaro MORIMOTO
author_facet Michihiko FUKUNAGA
Kentaro MORIMOTO
author_sort Michihiko FUKUNAGA
collection DOAJ
description The objective of this study is to calculate the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral forces at deep squatting and kneeling including seiza, which is the Japanese sedentary sitting. These postures are usually seen in daily life, especially in Japan or some regions in Asia or Arab. Thus it is expected to develop the artificial knee joint which is capable of making the posture, because the conventional prostheses cannot ensure deep knee flexion. We measured the joint angles of a lower limb and thigh-calf contact force at four postures. Then the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joint forces were calculated, by using the force and moment equilibrium conditions on the muscloskeltal model at saggital plane. As a result, the thigh-calf contact force was the smallest at heel-contact squatting (0.60BW) and was the largest at heel-rise squatting (1.16BW). The knee flexion angle at these postures were almost the same, therefore the force might be effected the angles of hip and ankle joint. The tibiofemoral force was the smallest at seiza (0.64BW) and was the largest at heel-rise squatting (1.87BW). The patellofemoral force was also the smallest at seiza (0.74BW) and was the largest at heel-rise squatting (1.72BW). Neglecting the thigh-calf contact force, the joint forces were 3.8 times larger on average. Considering the thigh-calf contact force, which might be affected by not only knee joint angle but also hip and ankle joint angle, the knee joint force decreased extremely and the comparison between the postures underwent significant change.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T08:42:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-add2a370c547434d9ed8ecfb095fba71
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1880-9863
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T08:42:01Z
publishDate 2015-11-01
publisher The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
record_format Article
series Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering
spelling doaj.art-add2a370c547434d9ed8ecfb095fba712022-12-22T03:39:50ZengThe Japan Society of Mechanical EngineersJournal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering1880-98632015-11-0110415-0045215-0045210.1299/jbse.15-00452jbseCalculation of the knee joint force at deep squatting and kneelingMichihiko FUKUNAGA0Kentaro MORIMOTO1Department of Mechanical and Energy Systems Engineering, Oita UniversityDepartment of Mechanical and Energy Systems Engineering, Oita UniversityThe objective of this study is to calculate the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral forces at deep squatting and kneeling including seiza, which is the Japanese sedentary sitting. These postures are usually seen in daily life, especially in Japan or some regions in Asia or Arab. Thus it is expected to develop the artificial knee joint which is capable of making the posture, because the conventional prostheses cannot ensure deep knee flexion. We measured the joint angles of a lower limb and thigh-calf contact force at four postures. Then the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joint forces were calculated, by using the force and moment equilibrium conditions on the muscloskeltal model at saggital plane. As a result, the thigh-calf contact force was the smallest at heel-contact squatting (0.60BW) and was the largest at heel-rise squatting (1.16BW). The knee flexion angle at these postures were almost the same, therefore the force might be effected the angles of hip and ankle joint. The tibiofemoral force was the smallest at seiza (0.64BW) and was the largest at heel-rise squatting (1.87BW). The patellofemoral force was also the smallest at seiza (0.74BW) and was the largest at heel-rise squatting (1.72BW). Neglecting the thigh-calf contact force, the joint forces were 3.8 times larger on average. Considering the thigh-calf contact force, which might be affected by not only knee joint angle but also hip and ankle joint angle, the knee joint force decreased extremely and the comparison between the postures underwent significant change.https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jbse/10/4/10_15-00452/_pdf/-char/endeep knee flexionknee joint forcekineticsmuscloskeltal modelthigh-calf contact
spellingShingle Michihiko FUKUNAGA
Kentaro MORIMOTO
Calculation of the knee joint force at deep squatting and kneeling
Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering
deep knee flexion
knee joint force
kinetics
muscloskeltal model
thigh-calf contact
title Calculation of the knee joint force at deep squatting and kneeling
title_full Calculation of the knee joint force at deep squatting and kneeling
title_fullStr Calculation of the knee joint force at deep squatting and kneeling
title_full_unstemmed Calculation of the knee joint force at deep squatting and kneeling
title_short Calculation of the knee joint force at deep squatting and kneeling
title_sort calculation of the knee joint force at deep squatting and kneeling
topic deep knee flexion
knee joint force
kinetics
muscloskeltal model
thigh-calf contact
url https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jbse/10/4/10_15-00452/_pdf/-char/en
work_keys_str_mv AT michihikofukunaga calculationofthekneejointforceatdeepsquattingandkneeling
AT kentaromorimoto calculationofthekneejointforceatdeepsquattingandkneeling