A test of a triadic conceptualization of future self-identification.
People encounter intertemporal decisions every day and often engage in behaviors that are not good for their future. One factor that may explain these decisions is the perception of their distal future self. An emerging body of research suggests that individuals vary in how they perceive their futur...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242504 |
| _version_ | 1819292797421748224 |
|---|---|
| author | Michael T Bixter Samantha L McMichael Cameron J Bunker Robert Mark Adelman Morris A Okun Kevin J Grimm Oliver Graudejus Virginia S Y Kwan |
| author_facet | Michael T Bixter Samantha L McMichael Cameron J Bunker Robert Mark Adelman Morris A Okun Kevin J Grimm Oliver Graudejus Virginia S Y Kwan |
| author_sort | Michael T Bixter |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | People encounter intertemporal decisions every day and often engage in behaviors that are not good for their future. One factor that may explain these decisions is the perception of their distal future self. An emerging body of research suggests that individuals vary in how they perceive their future self and many perceive their future self as a different person. The present research aimed to (1) build on and extend Hershfield's et al. (2011) review of the existing literature and advance the conceptualization of the relationship between the current and future self, (2) extend and develop measures of this relationship, and (3) examine whether and how this relationship predicts intrapsychic and achievement outcomes. The results of the literature review suggested that prior research mostly focused on one or two of the following components: (a) perceived relatedness between the current and future self in terms of similarity and connectedness, (b) vividness in imagining the future self, and (c) degree of positivity felt toward the future self. Additionally, differences in how researchers have labeled the overall construct lead us to propose future self-identification as a new label for the three-component construct. Our research built on existing measures to test the validity of a three-component model of future self-identification. Across three samples of first-year undergraduates, this research established the psychometric properties of the measure, and then examined the relationships between the components and four outcome domains of interest: (1) psychological well-being (self-esteem, hope), (2) imagination of the future (visual imagery of future events, perceived temporal distance), (3) self-control, and (4) academic performance. We demonstrated that the three components of future self-identification were correlated but independent factors. Additionally, the three components differed in their unique relationships with the outcome domains, demonstrating the utility of measuring all three components of future self-identification when seeking to predict important psychological and behavioral outcomes. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-24T04:00:14Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-add5b080d808454b9b30b6d97001bf67 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-24T04:00:14Z |
| publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-add5b080d808454b9b30b6d97001bf672022-12-21T17:16:19ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-011511e024250410.1371/journal.pone.0242504A test of a triadic conceptualization of future self-identification.Michael T BixterSamantha L McMichaelCameron J BunkerRobert Mark AdelmanMorris A OkunKevin J GrimmOliver GraudejusVirginia S Y KwanPeople encounter intertemporal decisions every day and often engage in behaviors that are not good for their future. One factor that may explain these decisions is the perception of their distal future self. An emerging body of research suggests that individuals vary in how they perceive their future self and many perceive their future self as a different person. The present research aimed to (1) build on and extend Hershfield's et al. (2011) review of the existing literature and advance the conceptualization of the relationship between the current and future self, (2) extend and develop measures of this relationship, and (3) examine whether and how this relationship predicts intrapsychic and achievement outcomes. The results of the literature review suggested that prior research mostly focused on one or two of the following components: (a) perceived relatedness between the current and future self in terms of similarity and connectedness, (b) vividness in imagining the future self, and (c) degree of positivity felt toward the future self. Additionally, differences in how researchers have labeled the overall construct lead us to propose future self-identification as a new label for the three-component construct. Our research built on existing measures to test the validity of a three-component model of future self-identification. Across three samples of first-year undergraduates, this research established the psychometric properties of the measure, and then examined the relationships between the components and four outcome domains of interest: (1) psychological well-being (self-esteem, hope), (2) imagination of the future (visual imagery of future events, perceived temporal distance), (3) self-control, and (4) academic performance. We demonstrated that the three components of future self-identification were correlated but independent factors. Additionally, the three components differed in their unique relationships with the outcome domains, demonstrating the utility of measuring all three components of future self-identification when seeking to predict important psychological and behavioral outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242504 |
| spellingShingle | Michael T Bixter Samantha L McMichael Cameron J Bunker Robert Mark Adelman Morris A Okun Kevin J Grimm Oliver Graudejus Virginia S Y Kwan A test of a triadic conceptualization of future self-identification. PLoS ONE |
| title | A test of a triadic conceptualization of future self-identification. |
| title_full | A test of a triadic conceptualization of future self-identification. |
| title_fullStr | A test of a triadic conceptualization of future self-identification. |
| title_full_unstemmed | A test of a triadic conceptualization of future self-identification. |
| title_short | A test of a triadic conceptualization of future self-identification. |
| title_sort | test of a triadic conceptualization of future self identification |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242504 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT michaeltbixter atestofatriadicconceptualizationoffutureselfidentification AT samanthalmcmichael atestofatriadicconceptualizationoffutureselfidentification AT cameronjbunker atestofatriadicconceptualizationoffutureselfidentification AT robertmarkadelman atestofatriadicconceptualizationoffutureselfidentification AT morrisaokun atestofatriadicconceptualizationoffutureselfidentification AT kevinjgrimm atestofatriadicconceptualizationoffutureselfidentification AT olivergraudejus atestofatriadicconceptualizationoffutureselfidentification AT virginiasykwan atestofatriadicconceptualizationoffutureselfidentification AT michaeltbixter testofatriadicconceptualizationoffutureselfidentification AT samanthalmcmichael testofatriadicconceptualizationoffutureselfidentification AT cameronjbunker testofatriadicconceptualizationoffutureselfidentification AT robertmarkadelman testofatriadicconceptualizationoffutureselfidentification AT morrisaokun testofatriadicconceptualizationoffutureselfidentification AT kevinjgrimm testofatriadicconceptualizationoffutureselfidentification AT olivergraudejus testofatriadicconceptualizationoffutureselfidentification AT virginiasykwan testofatriadicconceptualizationoffutureselfidentification |