Correction to: Does a Screening Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Pain of Neuropathic Origin have Clinical Utility and Cost-Effectiveness? (TRIAL-STIM Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Following publication of the original article [1], we have been notified that the final specification of randomisation implemented in the study is slightly different to that stated in the protocol and needs to be corrected as follows:
Main Authors: | Sam Eldabe, Ashish Gulve, Simon Thomson, Ganesan Baranidharan, Rui Duarte, Susan Jowett, Harbinder Sandhu, Raymond Chadwick, Morag Brookes, Anisah Tariq, Jenny Earle, Jill Bell, Anu Kansal, Shelley Rhodes, Rod S. Taylor |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Trials |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3804-7 |
Similar Items
-
Does a Screening Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Pain of Neuropathic Origin have Clinical Utility and Cost-Effectiveness? (TRIAL-STIM Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
by: Sam Eldabe, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Screening trials of spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain in England—A budget impact analysis
by: Rui V. Duarte, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
STIM-ulation for the big trial
by: Christian Arno Arranto
Published: (2012-07-01) -
Multicentre, double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial of 10 khz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for chronic neuropathic low back pain (MODULATE-LBP): a trial protocol
by: Adnan Al-Kaisy, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Establishment of a Visual Analog Scale for DBS Programming (VISUAL-STIM Trial)
by: Carla Palleis, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)