Recalibrating expectations about effect size: A multi-method survey of effect sizes in the ABCD study.
Effect sizes are commonly interpreted using heuristics established by Cohen (e.g., small: r = .1, medium r = .3, large r = .5), despite mounting evidence that these guidelines are mis-calibrated to the effects typically found in psychological research. This study's aims were to 1) describe the...
Main Authors: | Max M Owens, Alexandra Potter, Courtland S Hyatt, Matthew Albaugh, Wesley K Thompson, Terry Jernigan, Dekang Yuan, Sage Hahn, Nicholas Allgaier, Hugh Garavan |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257535 |
Similar Items
-
Multimethod investigation of the neurobiological basis of ADHD symptomatology in children aged 9-10: baseline data from the ABCD study
by: Max M. Owens, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Correction to: Multimethod investigation of the neurobiological basis of ADHD symptomatology in children aged 9-10: baseline data from the ABCD study
by: Max M. Owens, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Multimodal brain predictors of current weight and weight gain in children enrolled in the ABCD study ®
by: Shana Adise, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01) -
Prospective associations of family conflict with alcohol expectancies in the adolescent brain cognitive development study: effects of race and ethnicity
by: Skye C. Bristol, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01) -
Recalibrating single-study effect sizes using hierarchical Bayesian models
by: Zhipeng Cao, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)