Earthcasting: Geomorphic Forecasts for Society
Abstract Over the last several decades, the study of Earth surface processes has progressed from a descriptive science to an increasingly quantitative one due to advances in theoretical, experimental, and computational geosciences. The importance of geomorphic forecasts has never been greater, as te...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-11-01
|
Series: | Earth's Future |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002088 |
_version_ | 1818014086880821248 |
---|---|
author | Behrooz Ferdowsi John D. Gartner Kerri N. Johnson Alan Kasprak Kimberly L. Miller William Nardin Alejandra C. Ortiz Alejandro Tejedor |
author_facet | Behrooz Ferdowsi John D. Gartner Kerri N. Johnson Alan Kasprak Kimberly L. Miller William Nardin Alejandra C. Ortiz Alejandro Tejedor |
author_sort | Behrooz Ferdowsi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Over the last several decades, the study of Earth surface processes has progressed from a descriptive science to an increasingly quantitative one due to advances in theoretical, experimental, and computational geosciences. The importance of geomorphic forecasts has never been greater, as technological development and global climate change threaten to reshape the landscapes that support human societies and natural ecosystems. Here we explore best practices for developing socially relevant forecasts of Earth surface change, a goal we are calling “earthcasting”. We suggest that earthcasts have the following features: they focus on temporal (∼1–∼100 years) and spatial (∼1 m–∼10 km) scales relevant to planning; they are designed with direct involvement of stakeholders and public beneficiaries through the evaluation of the socioeconomic impacts of geomorphic processes; and they generate forecasts that are clearly stated, testable, and include quantitative uncertainties. Earthcasts bridge the gap between Earth surface researchers and decision‐makers, stakeholders, researchers from other disciplines, and the general public. We investigate the defining features of earthcasts and evaluate some specific examples. This paper builds on previous studies of prediction in geomorphology by recommending a roadmap for (a) generating earthcasts, especially those based on modeling; (b) transforming a subset of geomorphic research into earthcasts; and (c) communicating earthcasts beyond the geomorphology research community. Earthcasting exemplifies the social benefit of geomorphology research, and it calls for renewed research efforts toward further understanding the limits of predictability of Earth surface systems and processes, and the uncertainties associated with modeling geomorphic processes and their impacts. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-14T06:41:16Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ade8c0745b184b8383e1b988b014bb75 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2328-4277 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-14T06:41:16Z |
publishDate | 2021-11-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Earth's Future |
spelling | doaj.art-ade8c0745b184b8383e1b988b014bb752022-12-22T02:07:20ZengWileyEarth's Future2328-42772021-11-01911n/an/a10.1029/2021EF002088Earthcasting: Geomorphic Forecasts for SocietyBehrooz Ferdowsi0John D. Gartner1Kerri N. Johnson2Alan Kasprak3Kimberly L. Miller4William Nardin5Alejandra C. Ortiz6Alejandro Tejedor7National Center for Earth‐surface Dynamics University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USANational Center for Earth‐surface Dynamics University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USANational Center for Earth‐surface Dynamics University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USANational Center for Earth‐surface Dynamics University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USANational Center for Earth‐surface Dynamics University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USANational Center for Earth‐surface Dynamics University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USANational Center for Earth‐surface Dynamics University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USANational Center for Earth‐surface Dynamics University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USAAbstract Over the last several decades, the study of Earth surface processes has progressed from a descriptive science to an increasingly quantitative one due to advances in theoretical, experimental, and computational geosciences. The importance of geomorphic forecasts has never been greater, as technological development and global climate change threaten to reshape the landscapes that support human societies and natural ecosystems. Here we explore best practices for developing socially relevant forecasts of Earth surface change, a goal we are calling “earthcasting”. We suggest that earthcasts have the following features: they focus on temporal (∼1–∼100 years) and spatial (∼1 m–∼10 km) scales relevant to planning; they are designed with direct involvement of stakeholders and public beneficiaries through the evaluation of the socioeconomic impacts of geomorphic processes; and they generate forecasts that are clearly stated, testable, and include quantitative uncertainties. Earthcasts bridge the gap between Earth surface researchers and decision‐makers, stakeholders, researchers from other disciplines, and the general public. We investigate the defining features of earthcasts and evaluate some specific examples. This paper builds on previous studies of prediction in geomorphology by recommending a roadmap for (a) generating earthcasts, especially those based on modeling; (b) transforming a subset of geomorphic research into earthcasts; and (c) communicating earthcasts beyond the geomorphology research community. Earthcasting exemplifies the social benefit of geomorphology research, and it calls for renewed research efforts toward further understanding the limits of predictability of Earth surface systems and processes, and the uncertainties associated with modeling geomorphic processes and their impacts.https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002088predictions in geomorphologypracticable predictionsearthcastingimpacts of geomorphic processes |
spellingShingle | Behrooz Ferdowsi John D. Gartner Kerri N. Johnson Alan Kasprak Kimberly L. Miller William Nardin Alejandra C. Ortiz Alejandro Tejedor Earthcasting: Geomorphic Forecasts for Society Earth's Future predictions in geomorphology practicable predictions earthcasting impacts of geomorphic processes |
title | Earthcasting: Geomorphic Forecasts for Society |
title_full | Earthcasting: Geomorphic Forecasts for Society |
title_fullStr | Earthcasting: Geomorphic Forecasts for Society |
title_full_unstemmed | Earthcasting: Geomorphic Forecasts for Society |
title_short | Earthcasting: Geomorphic Forecasts for Society |
title_sort | earthcasting geomorphic forecasts for society |
topic | predictions in geomorphology practicable predictions earthcasting impacts of geomorphic processes |
url | https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002088 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT behroozferdowsi earthcastinggeomorphicforecastsforsociety AT johndgartner earthcastinggeomorphicforecastsforsociety AT kerrinjohnson earthcastinggeomorphicforecastsforsociety AT alankasprak earthcastinggeomorphicforecastsforsociety AT kimberlylmiller earthcastinggeomorphicforecastsforsociety AT williamnardin earthcastinggeomorphicforecastsforsociety AT alejandracortiz earthcastinggeomorphicforecastsforsociety AT alejandrotejedor earthcastinggeomorphicforecastsforsociety |