Exploring Typology Categorizations of Male Perpetrators: A Methodology Study

Intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrators were categorized based on whether they were generally violent (GV) or family only violent (FO) using self-report or arrest records. Classification criteria to assess recidivism in perpetrators of IPV were evaluated herein to determine the incremental vali...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emily N. Weber, Ashley R. Taylor, Arthur L. Cantos, Barbara G. Amado, K. Daniel O’Leary
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y Forense 2019-06-01
Series:European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
Subjects:
Online Access: https://journals.copmadrid.org/ejpalc/archivos/1889_1861_ejpalc_11_2_0093.pdf
_version_ 1818497894659915776
author Emily N. Weber
Ashley R. Taylor
Arthur L. Cantos
Barbara G. Amado
K. Daniel O’Leary
author_facet Emily N. Weber
Ashley R. Taylor
Arthur L. Cantos
Barbara G. Amado
K. Daniel O’Leary
author_sort Emily N. Weber
collection DOAJ
description Intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrators were categorized based on whether they were generally violent (GV) or family only violent (FO) using self-report or arrest records. Classification criteria to assess recidivism in perpetrators of IPV were evaluated herein to determine the incremental validity of using a perpetrator’s criminal history in addition to their self-report information for categorization purposes. The concordance rates for categorizing subtypes of male perpetrators were compared for two methods, namely, self-report versus criminal history data. Categorizations were made based on self-reported history of violence and federal criminal records separately. Between measures consistency was defined as whether or not the self-report categorizations matched federal criminal record categorizations. It was hypothesized that self-report would not be sufficient as the sole method of categorizing male perpetrators, and the use of criminal history data would add to the validity of the categorization system. Self-reports of aggression were higher than criminal records of aggression. Using data sources together may yield the best outcomes for offenders and society. Implications are discussed.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T18:51:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-adeb370341df419f82b36fb694e4a64a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1889-1861
1989-4007
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T18:51:08Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher Sociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y Forense
record_format Article
series European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
spelling doaj.art-adeb370341df419f82b36fb694e4a64a2022-12-22T01:37:18ZengSociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y ForenseEuropean Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context1889-18611989-40072019-06-01112939710.5093/ejpalc2019a511320559Exploring Typology Categorizations of Male Perpetrators: A Methodology StudyEmily N. Weber0Ashley R. Taylor1Arthur L. Cantos2Barbara G. Amado3K. Daniel O’Leary4Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago IL , USA, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, USA;Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago IL , USA, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, USA;University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg Texas , USA, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, Texas, USA;Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Spain, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Spain;Stony Brook University, Stony Brook NY , USA, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USAIntimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrators were categorized based on whether they were generally violent (GV) or family only violent (FO) using self-report or arrest records. Classification criteria to assess recidivism in perpetrators of IPV were evaluated herein to determine the incremental validity of using a perpetrator’s criminal history in addition to their self-report information for categorization purposes. The concordance rates for categorizing subtypes of male perpetrators were compared for two methods, namely, self-report versus criminal history data. Categorizations were made based on self-reported history of violence and federal criminal records separately. Between measures consistency was defined as whether or not the self-report categorizations matched federal criminal record categorizations. It was hypothesized that self-report would not be sufficient as the sole method of categorizing male perpetrators, and the use of criminal history data would add to the validity of the categorization system. Self-reports of aggression were higher than criminal records of aggression. Using data sources together may yield the best outcomes for offenders and society. Implications are discussed. https://journals.copmadrid.org/ejpalc/archivos/1889_1861_ejpalc_11_2_0093.pdf Intimate partner violenceIPV (family only)Generally violentSelf-report
spellingShingle Emily N. Weber
Ashley R. Taylor
Arthur L. Cantos
Barbara G. Amado
K. Daniel O’Leary
Exploring Typology Categorizations of Male Perpetrators: A Methodology Study
European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
Intimate partner violence
IPV (family only)
Generally violent
Self-report
title Exploring Typology Categorizations of Male Perpetrators: A Methodology Study
title_full Exploring Typology Categorizations of Male Perpetrators: A Methodology Study
title_fullStr Exploring Typology Categorizations of Male Perpetrators: A Methodology Study
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Typology Categorizations of Male Perpetrators: A Methodology Study
title_short Exploring Typology Categorizations of Male Perpetrators: A Methodology Study
title_sort exploring typology categorizations of male perpetrators a methodology study
topic Intimate partner violence
IPV (family only)
Generally violent
Self-report
url https://journals.copmadrid.org/ejpalc/archivos/1889_1861_ejpalc_11_2_0093.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT emilynweber exploringtypologycategorizationsofmaleperpetratorsamethodologystudy
AT ashleyrtaylor exploringtypologycategorizationsofmaleperpetratorsamethodologystudy
AT arthurlcantos exploringtypologycategorizationsofmaleperpetratorsamethodologystudy
AT barbaragamado exploringtypologycategorizationsofmaleperpetratorsamethodologystudy
AT kdanieloleary exploringtypologycategorizationsofmaleperpetratorsamethodologystudy