Exploring Typology Categorizations of Male Perpetrators: A Methodology Study
Intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrators were categorized based on whether they were generally violent (GV) or family only violent (FO) using self-report or arrest records. Classification criteria to assess recidivism in perpetrators of IPV were evaluated herein to determine the incremental vali...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y Forense
2019-06-01
|
Series: | European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
https://journals.copmadrid.org/ejpalc/archivos/1889_1861_ejpalc_11_2_0093.pdf
|
_version_ | 1818497894659915776 |
---|---|
author | Emily N. Weber Ashley R. Taylor Arthur L. Cantos Barbara G. Amado K. Daniel O’Leary |
author_facet | Emily N. Weber Ashley R. Taylor Arthur L. Cantos Barbara G. Amado K. Daniel O’Leary |
author_sort | Emily N. Weber |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrators were categorized based on whether they were generally violent (GV) or family only violent (FO) using self-report or arrest records. Classification criteria to assess recidivism in perpetrators of IPV were evaluated herein to determine the incremental validity of using a perpetrator’s criminal history in addition to their self-report information for categorization purposes. The concordance rates for categorizing subtypes of male perpetrators were compared for two methods, namely, self-report versus criminal history data. Categorizations were made based on self-reported history of violence and federal criminal records separately. Between measures consistency was defined as whether or not the self-report categorizations matched federal criminal record categorizations. It was hypothesized that self-report would not be sufficient as the sole method of categorizing male perpetrators, and the use of criminal history data would add to the validity of the categorization system. Self-reports of aggression were higher than criminal records of aggression. Using data sources together may yield the best outcomes for offenders and society. Implications are discussed. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-10T18:51:08Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-adeb370341df419f82b36fb694e4a64a |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1889-1861 1989-4007 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-10T18:51:08Z |
publishDate | 2019-06-01 |
publisher | Sociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y Forense |
record_format | Article |
series | European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context |
spelling | doaj.art-adeb370341df419f82b36fb694e4a64a2022-12-22T01:37:18ZengSociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y ForenseEuropean Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context1889-18611989-40072019-06-01112939710.5093/ejpalc2019a511320559Exploring Typology Categorizations of Male Perpetrators: A Methodology StudyEmily N. Weber0Ashley R. Taylor1Arthur L. Cantos2Barbara G. Amado3K. Daniel O’Leary4Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago IL , USA, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, USA;Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago IL , USA, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, USA;University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg Texas , USA, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, Texas, USA;Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Spain, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Spain;Stony Brook University, Stony Brook NY , USA, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USAIntimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrators were categorized based on whether they were generally violent (GV) or family only violent (FO) using self-report or arrest records. Classification criteria to assess recidivism in perpetrators of IPV were evaluated herein to determine the incremental validity of using a perpetrator’s criminal history in addition to their self-report information for categorization purposes. The concordance rates for categorizing subtypes of male perpetrators were compared for two methods, namely, self-report versus criminal history data. Categorizations were made based on self-reported history of violence and federal criminal records separately. Between measures consistency was defined as whether or not the self-report categorizations matched federal criminal record categorizations. It was hypothesized that self-report would not be sufficient as the sole method of categorizing male perpetrators, and the use of criminal history data would add to the validity of the categorization system. Self-reports of aggression were higher than criminal records of aggression. Using data sources together may yield the best outcomes for offenders and society. Implications are discussed. https://journals.copmadrid.org/ejpalc/archivos/1889_1861_ejpalc_11_2_0093.pdf Intimate partner violenceIPV (family only)Generally violentSelf-report |
spellingShingle | Emily N. Weber Ashley R. Taylor Arthur L. Cantos Barbara G. Amado K. Daniel O’Leary Exploring Typology Categorizations of Male Perpetrators: A Methodology Study European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context Intimate partner violence IPV (family only) Generally violent Self-report |
title | Exploring Typology Categorizations of Male Perpetrators: A Methodology Study |
title_full | Exploring Typology Categorizations of Male Perpetrators: A Methodology Study |
title_fullStr | Exploring Typology Categorizations of Male Perpetrators: A Methodology Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring Typology Categorizations of Male Perpetrators: A Methodology Study |
title_short | Exploring Typology Categorizations of Male Perpetrators: A Methodology Study |
title_sort | exploring typology categorizations of male perpetrators a methodology study |
topic | Intimate partner violence IPV (family only) Generally violent Self-report |
url |
https://journals.copmadrid.org/ejpalc/archivos/1889_1861_ejpalc_11_2_0093.pdf
|
work_keys_str_mv | AT emilynweber exploringtypologycategorizationsofmaleperpetratorsamethodologystudy AT ashleyrtaylor exploringtypologycategorizationsofmaleperpetratorsamethodologystudy AT arthurlcantos exploringtypologycategorizationsofmaleperpetratorsamethodologystudy AT barbaragamado exploringtypologycategorizationsofmaleperpetratorsamethodologystudy AT kdanieloleary exploringtypologycategorizationsofmaleperpetratorsamethodologystudy |