Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: A preliminary report

Objectives: The recurrence of pediatric nephrolithiasis, the morbidity of repeated open surgical treatment as well as our experience in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in adult patients, all derived us to shift to PNL for managing renal stones >1.5 cm in pediatric patients. Our aim of this stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmad A. Elderwy, Mohamed Gadelmoula, Mohamed A. Elgammal, Ehab Osama, Hamdan Al-Hazmi, H. Hammouda, Esam Osman, Medhat A. Abdullah, Khalid Fouda Neel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2014-01-01
Series:Urology Annals
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2014;volume=6;issue=3;spage=187;epage=191;aulast=Elderwy
_version_ 1831725885009428480
author Ahmad A. Elderwy
Mohamed Gadelmoula
Mohamed A. Elgammal
Ehab Osama
Hamdan Al-Hazmi
H. Hammouda
Esam Osman
Medhat A. Abdullah
Khalid Fouda Neel
author_facet Ahmad A. Elderwy
Mohamed Gadelmoula
Mohamed A. Elgammal
Ehab Osama
Hamdan Al-Hazmi
H. Hammouda
Esam Osman
Medhat A. Abdullah
Khalid Fouda Neel
author_sort Ahmad A. Elderwy
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: The recurrence of pediatric nephrolithiasis, the morbidity of repeated open surgical treatment as well as our experience in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in adult patients, all derived us to shift to PNL for managing renal stones >1.5 cm in pediatric patients. Our aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PNL in pediatric patients. Materials and Methods: During the period of the month between May 2011 and April 2013, 38 children (47 renal units) underwent PNL for renal stones 1.5-5 cm in length. Patient demographics, stone characteristics, and clinical outcome were prospectively studied. Data of those who underwent conventional and tubeless PNL were compared. Median follow-up period was 12 months (range: 6-24). Results: The median age at presentation was 8-year (range: 3-12). The operative time ranged from 30 to 120 min (median 90). Overall stone clearance rate was 91.5% after single PNL. The median hospital stay was 3 days. Auxiliary procedures were successful for the remaining 4 patients (nephroscopic clearance in one and shockwave lithotripsy in 3). Tubeless PNL was performed in 17 renal units with a comparable outcome to conventional ones. The perioperative complications were noted in 5/47 (10.6%) of all procedures (Clavien Grade II in 4 and Clavien Grade IIIa in 1) and were managed conservatively. Conclusions: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones in pediatric patients is safe and feasible if performed by a well-experienced endourologist. Tubeless PNL is a better choice for children.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T04:49:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-adf3468bc8cf4f2bb21a208f0fcd2f7d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0974-7796
0974-7834
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T04:49:52Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Urology Annals
spelling doaj.art-adf3468bc8cf4f2bb21a208f0fcd2f7d2022-12-21T19:15:29ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsUrology Annals0974-77960974-78342014-01-016318719110.4103/0974-7796.134255Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: A preliminary reportAhmad A. ElderwyMohamed GadelmoulaMohamed A. ElgammalEhab OsamaHamdan Al-HazmiH. HammoudaEsam OsmanMedhat A. AbdullahKhalid Fouda NeelObjectives: The recurrence of pediatric nephrolithiasis, the morbidity of repeated open surgical treatment as well as our experience in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in adult patients, all derived us to shift to PNL for managing renal stones >1.5 cm in pediatric patients. Our aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PNL in pediatric patients. Materials and Methods: During the period of the month between May 2011 and April 2013, 38 children (47 renal units) underwent PNL for renal stones 1.5-5 cm in length. Patient demographics, stone characteristics, and clinical outcome were prospectively studied. Data of those who underwent conventional and tubeless PNL were compared. Median follow-up period was 12 months (range: 6-24). Results: The median age at presentation was 8-year (range: 3-12). The operative time ranged from 30 to 120 min (median 90). Overall stone clearance rate was 91.5% after single PNL. The median hospital stay was 3 days. Auxiliary procedures were successful for the remaining 4 patients (nephroscopic clearance in one and shockwave lithotripsy in 3). Tubeless PNL was performed in 17 renal units with a comparable outcome to conventional ones. The perioperative complications were noted in 5/47 (10.6%) of all procedures (Clavien Grade II in 4 and Clavien Grade IIIa in 1) and were managed conservatively. Conclusions: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones in pediatric patients is safe and feasible if performed by a well-experienced endourologist. Tubeless PNL is a better choice for children.http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2014;volume=6;issue=3;spage=187;epage=191;aulast=ElderwyNephrolithiasispediatric urolithiasispercutaneous nephrolithotomytubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy
spellingShingle Ahmad A. Elderwy
Mohamed Gadelmoula
Mohamed A. Elgammal
Ehab Osama
Hamdan Al-Hazmi
H. Hammouda
Esam Osman
Medhat A. Abdullah
Khalid Fouda Neel
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: A preliminary report
Urology Annals
Nephrolithiasis
pediatric urolithiasis
percutaneous nephrolithotomy
tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: A preliminary report
title_full Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: A preliminary report
title_fullStr Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: A preliminary report
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: A preliminary report
title_short Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: A preliminary report
title_sort percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children a preliminary report
topic Nephrolithiasis
pediatric urolithiasis
percutaneous nephrolithotomy
tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy
url http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2014;volume=6;issue=3;spage=187;epage=191;aulast=Elderwy
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadaelderwy percutaneousnephrolithotomyinchildrenapreliminaryreport
AT mohamedgadelmoula percutaneousnephrolithotomyinchildrenapreliminaryreport
AT mohamedaelgammal percutaneousnephrolithotomyinchildrenapreliminaryreport
AT ehabosama percutaneousnephrolithotomyinchildrenapreliminaryreport
AT hamdanalhazmi percutaneousnephrolithotomyinchildrenapreliminaryreport
AT hhammouda percutaneousnephrolithotomyinchildrenapreliminaryreport
AT esamosman percutaneousnephrolithotomyinchildrenapreliminaryreport
AT medhataabdullah percutaneousnephrolithotomyinchildrenapreliminaryreport
AT khalidfoudaneel percutaneousnephrolithotomyinchildrenapreliminaryreport