Evaluation of Docking Machine Learning and Molecular Dynamics Methodologies for DNA-Ligand Systems

DNA is a molecular target for the treatment of several diseases, including cancer, but there are few docking methodologies exploring the interactions between nucleic acids with DNA intercalating agents. Different docking methodologies, such as AutoDock Vina, DOCK 6, and Consensus, implemented into M...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tiago Alves de Oliveira, Lucas Rolim Medaglia, Eduardo Habib Bechelane Maia, Letícia Cristina Assis, Paulo Batista de Carvalho, Alisson Marques da Silva, Alex Gutterres Taranto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-01-01
Series:Pharmaceuticals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/15/2/132
_version_ 1797477337894223872
author Tiago Alves de Oliveira
Lucas Rolim Medaglia
Eduardo Habib Bechelane Maia
Letícia Cristina Assis
Paulo Batista de Carvalho
Alisson Marques da Silva
Alex Gutterres Taranto
author_facet Tiago Alves de Oliveira
Lucas Rolim Medaglia
Eduardo Habib Bechelane Maia
Letícia Cristina Assis
Paulo Batista de Carvalho
Alisson Marques da Silva
Alex Gutterres Taranto
author_sort Tiago Alves de Oliveira
collection DOAJ
description DNA is a molecular target for the treatment of several diseases, including cancer, but there are few docking methodologies exploring the interactions between nucleic acids with DNA intercalating agents. Different docking methodologies, such as AutoDock Vina, DOCK 6, and Consensus, implemented into Molecular Architect (MolAr), were evaluated for their ability to analyze those interactions, considering visual inspection, redocking, and ROC curve. Ligands were refined by Parametric Method 7 (PM7), and ligands and decoys were docked into the minor DNA groove (PDB code: 1VZK). As a result, the area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) was 0.98, 0.88, and 0.99 for AutoDock Vina, DOCK 6, and Consensus methodologies, respectively. In addition, we proposed a machine learning model to determine the experimental ∆T<sub>m</sub> value, which found a 0.84 R<sup>2</sup> score. Finally, the selected ligands mono imidazole lexitropsin (<b>42</b>), netropsin (<b>45</b>), and <i>N</i>,<i>N</i>′-(1H-pyrrole-2,5-diyldi-4,1-phenylene)dibenzenecarboximidamide (<b>51</b>) were submitted to Molecular Dynamic Simulations (MD) through NAMD software to evaluate their equilibrium binding pose into the groove. In conclusion, the use of MolAr improves the docking results obtained with other methodologies, is a suitable methodology to use in the DNA system and was proven to be a valuable tool to estimate the ∆T<sub>m</sub> experimental values of DNA intercalating agents.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T21:16:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-adfe93ce80514a20b6cc6c00e53c21ca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8247
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T21:16:10Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Pharmaceuticals
spelling doaj.art-adfe93ce80514a20b6cc6c00e53c21ca2023-11-23T21:33:31ZengMDPI AGPharmaceuticals1424-82472022-01-0115213210.3390/ph15020132Evaluation of Docking Machine Learning and Molecular Dynamics Methodologies for DNA-Ligand SystemsTiago Alves de Oliveira0Lucas Rolim Medaglia1Eduardo Habib Bechelane Maia2Letícia Cristina Assis3Paulo Batista de Carvalho4Alisson Marques da Silva5Alex Gutterres Taranto6Department of Bioengineering, Federal University of Sao Joao del-Rei, Praça Dom Helvecio, 74, Fabricas, Sao Joao del-Rei 36301-1601, MG, BrazilDepartment of Bioengineering, Federal University of Sao Joao del-Rei, Praça Dom Helvecio, 74, Fabricas, Sao Joao del-Rei 36301-1601, MG, BrazilFederal Center for Technological Education of Minas Gerais, Department of Informatics, Management and Design, CEFET MG, Campus Divinopolis, Rua Alvares de Azevedo, 400, Bela Vista, Divinopolis 35503-822, MG, BrazilDepartment of Bioengineering, Federal University of Sao Joao del-Rei, Praça Dom Helvecio, 74, Fabricas, Sao Joao del-Rei 36301-1601, MG, BrazilFeik School of Pharmacy, University of the Incarnate Word, 4301 Broadway, San Antonio, TX 78209, USAFederal Center for Technological Education of Minas Gerais, Department of Informatics, Management and Design, CEFET MG, Campus Divinopolis, Rua Alvares de Azevedo, 400, Bela Vista, Divinopolis 35503-822, MG, BrazilDepartment of Bioengineering, Federal University of Sao Joao del-Rei, Praça Dom Helvecio, 74, Fabricas, Sao Joao del-Rei 36301-1601, MG, BrazilDNA is a molecular target for the treatment of several diseases, including cancer, but there are few docking methodologies exploring the interactions between nucleic acids with DNA intercalating agents. Different docking methodologies, such as AutoDock Vina, DOCK 6, and Consensus, implemented into Molecular Architect (MolAr), were evaluated for their ability to analyze those interactions, considering visual inspection, redocking, and ROC curve. Ligands were refined by Parametric Method 7 (PM7), and ligands and decoys were docked into the minor DNA groove (PDB code: 1VZK). As a result, the area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) was 0.98, 0.88, and 0.99 for AutoDock Vina, DOCK 6, and Consensus methodologies, respectively. In addition, we proposed a machine learning model to determine the experimental ∆T<sub>m</sub> value, which found a 0.84 R<sup>2</sup> score. Finally, the selected ligands mono imidazole lexitropsin (<b>42</b>), netropsin (<b>45</b>), and <i>N</i>,<i>N</i>′-(1H-pyrrole-2,5-diyldi-4,1-phenylene)dibenzenecarboximidamide (<b>51</b>) were submitted to Molecular Dynamic Simulations (MD) through NAMD software to evaluate their equilibrium binding pose into the groove. In conclusion, the use of MolAr improves the docking results obtained with other methodologies, is a suitable methodology to use in the DNA system and was proven to be a valuable tool to estimate the ∆T<sub>m</sub> experimental values of DNA intercalating agents.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/15/2/132computer drug designmolecular dockingmolecular dynamic simulationvirtual screeningMolArDNA intercalating agents
spellingShingle Tiago Alves de Oliveira
Lucas Rolim Medaglia
Eduardo Habib Bechelane Maia
Letícia Cristina Assis
Paulo Batista de Carvalho
Alisson Marques da Silva
Alex Gutterres Taranto
Evaluation of Docking Machine Learning and Molecular Dynamics Methodologies for DNA-Ligand Systems
Pharmaceuticals
computer drug design
molecular docking
molecular dynamic simulation
virtual screening
MolAr
DNA intercalating agents
title Evaluation of Docking Machine Learning and Molecular Dynamics Methodologies for DNA-Ligand Systems
title_full Evaluation of Docking Machine Learning and Molecular Dynamics Methodologies for DNA-Ligand Systems
title_fullStr Evaluation of Docking Machine Learning and Molecular Dynamics Methodologies for DNA-Ligand Systems
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Docking Machine Learning and Molecular Dynamics Methodologies for DNA-Ligand Systems
title_short Evaluation of Docking Machine Learning and Molecular Dynamics Methodologies for DNA-Ligand Systems
title_sort evaluation of docking machine learning and molecular dynamics methodologies for dna ligand systems
topic computer drug design
molecular docking
molecular dynamic simulation
virtual screening
MolAr
DNA intercalating agents
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/15/2/132
work_keys_str_mv AT tiagoalvesdeoliveira evaluationofdockingmachinelearningandmoleculardynamicsmethodologiesfordnaligandsystems
AT lucasrolimmedaglia evaluationofdockingmachinelearningandmoleculardynamicsmethodologiesfordnaligandsystems
AT eduardohabibbechelanemaia evaluationofdockingmachinelearningandmoleculardynamicsmethodologiesfordnaligandsystems
AT leticiacristinaassis evaluationofdockingmachinelearningandmoleculardynamicsmethodologiesfordnaligandsystems
AT paulobatistadecarvalho evaluationofdockingmachinelearningandmoleculardynamicsmethodologiesfordnaligandsystems
AT alissonmarquesdasilva evaluationofdockingmachinelearningandmoleculardynamicsmethodologiesfordnaligandsystems
AT alexgutterrestaranto evaluationofdockingmachinelearningandmoleculardynamicsmethodologiesfordnaligandsystems