The Language of Archaeology II
The paper is an auto-reflexive critical reconsideration of the author’s own previous writings on theory in archaeology. The imperfections of the early papers are scrutinized in connection to the prevailing attitude in the local disciplinary community at the time. Archaeology in Serbia has been with...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Belgrade
2009-06-01
|
| Series: | Etnoantropološki Problemi |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eap-iea.org/index.php/eap/article/view/861 |
| _version_ | 1818296151513759744 |
|---|---|
| author | Staša Babić |
| author_facet | Staša Babić |
| author_sort | Staša Babić |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
The paper is an auto-reflexive critical reconsideration of the author’s own previous writings on theory in archaeology. The imperfections of the early papers are scrutinized in connection to the prevailing attitude in the local disciplinary community at the time. Archaeology in Serbia has been withdrawn from the main theoretical discussions, and the individual attempts were aimed at compensating for this setback, introducing the essence of the current debates. Since the two major paradigms of the discipline – processual and post-processual, formulated in their original setting within the timespan of almost three decades, were presented simultaneously, they were merged in an unconsistent manner.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-12-13T03:58:59Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ae0454c9b42e49fdae2172412a8c80a9 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0353-1589 2334-8801 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-13T03:58:59Z |
| publishDate | 2009-06-01 |
| publisher | University of Belgrade |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Etnoantropološki Problemi |
| spelling | doaj.art-ae0454c9b42e49fdae2172412a8c80a92022-12-22T00:00:31ZengUniversity of BelgradeEtnoantropološki Problemi0353-15892334-88012009-06-014110.21301/eap.v4i1.6The Language of Archaeology IIStaša Babić0Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Serbia The paper is an auto-reflexive critical reconsideration of the author’s own previous writings on theory in archaeology. The imperfections of the early papers are scrutinized in connection to the prevailing attitude in the local disciplinary community at the time. Archaeology in Serbia has been withdrawn from the main theoretical discussions, and the individual attempts were aimed at compensating for this setback, introducing the essence of the current debates. Since the two major paradigms of the discipline – processual and post-processual, formulated in their original setting within the timespan of almost three decades, were presented simultaneously, they were merged in an unconsistent manner. http://eap-iea.org/index.php/eap/article/view/861paradigm shifttheory in archaeology; culture-historical, processual and post-processual approachesthe position of the researcher |
| spellingShingle | Staša Babić The Language of Archaeology II Etnoantropološki Problemi paradigm shift theory in archaeology ; culture-historical, processual and post-processual approaches the position of the researcher |
| title | The Language of Archaeology II |
| title_full | The Language of Archaeology II |
| title_fullStr | The Language of Archaeology II |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Language of Archaeology II |
| title_short | The Language of Archaeology II |
| title_sort | language of archaeology ii |
| topic | paradigm shift theory in archaeology ; culture-historical, processual and post-processual approaches the position of the researcher |
| url | http://eap-iea.org/index.php/eap/article/view/861 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stasababic thelanguageofarchaeologyii AT stasababic languageofarchaeologyii |