The Response of Soil pH and Exchangeable Al to Alum and Lime Amendments

Intensive cultivation and unprecedented utilization of ammoniacal fertilizer has accelerated soil acidification in the southern Great Plains and many other parts of the world. During a two-year study that evaluated the impact of soil pH and aluminum (Al) toxicity on winter wheat yield potential, we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher Jorelle Gillespie, João Arthur Antonangelo, Hailin Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/6/547
_version_ 1797530138002325504
author Christopher Jorelle Gillespie
João Arthur Antonangelo
Hailin Zhang
author_facet Christopher Jorelle Gillespie
João Arthur Antonangelo
Hailin Zhang
author_sort Christopher Jorelle Gillespie
collection DOAJ
description Intensive cultivation and unprecedented utilization of ammoniacal fertilizer has accelerated soil acidification in the southern Great Plains and many other parts of the world. During a two-year study that evaluated the impact of soil pH and aluminum (Al) toxicity on winter wheat yield potential, we observed a variance in the edaphic responses of the two study sites (Stillwater and Chickasha) to two soil amendments, Alum [Al<sub>2</sub>(SO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub>] and lime [Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub>]. We found that Al<sub>KCl</sub> values at Stillwater were 223% and 150% higher than Chickasha during Year 1 and Year 2, respectively, with similar soil pH. Additionally, Al<sub>sat</sub> values at Stillwater were 30.6% and 24.9% higher than Chickasha during Year 1 and Year 2, respectively. Surprisingly, when treated as a bivariate of Al<sub>sat</sub>, soil buffer indices differed in graphical structure. While Chickasha was identified with a cubic polynomial (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), Stillwater was characterized by linear regression (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). We have reason to believe that this divergence in edaphic response might be attributed to the organically bound Al, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), spatio-temporal variance, and adsorption reactions regulated by the solubility of Al(OH)<sup>+2</sup> species in acidic soils.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T10:24:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ae05abae535f4ccc82bf54ffce5b4131
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0472
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T10:24:41Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agriculture
spelling doaj.art-ae05abae535f4ccc82bf54ffce5b41312023-11-22T00:08:52ZengMDPI AGAgriculture2077-04722021-06-0111654710.3390/agriculture11060547The Response of Soil pH and Exchangeable Al to Alum and Lime AmendmentsChristopher Jorelle Gillespie0João Arthur Antonangelo1Hailin Zhang2Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USADepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USADepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USAIntensive cultivation and unprecedented utilization of ammoniacal fertilizer has accelerated soil acidification in the southern Great Plains and many other parts of the world. During a two-year study that evaluated the impact of soil pH and aluminum (Al) toxicity on winter wheat yield potential, we observed a variance in the edaphic responses of the two study sites (Stillwater and Chickasha) to two soil amendments, Alum [Al<sub>2</sub>(SO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub>] and lime [Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub>]. We found that Al<sub>KCl</sub> values at Stillwater were 223% and 150% higher than Chickasha during Year 1 and Year 2, respectively, with similar soil pH. Additionally, Al<sub>sat</sub> values at Stillwater were 30.6% and 24.9% higher than Chickasha during Year 1 and Year 2, respectively. Surprisingly, when treated as a bivariate of Al<sub>sat</sub>, soil buffer indices differed in graphical structure. While Chickasha was identified with a cubic polynomial (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), Stillwater was characterized by linear regression (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). We have reason to believe that this divergence in edaphic response might be attributed to the organically bound Al, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), spatio-temporal variance, and adsorption reactions regulated by the solubility of Al(OH)<sup>+2</sup> species in acidic soils.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/6/547exchangeable aluminumaluminum saturationbuffer indexdissolved organic carbonsoil organic matter
spellingShingle Christopher Jorelle Gillespie
João Arthur Antonangelo
Hailin Zhang
The Response of Soil pH and Exchangeable Al to Alum and Lime Amendments
Agriculture
exchangeable aluminum
aluminum saturation
buffer index
dissolved organic carbon
soil organic matter
title The Response of Soil pH and Exchangeable Al to Alum and Lime Amendments
title_full The Response of Soil pH and Exchangeable Al to Alum and Lime Amendments
title_fullStr The Response of Soil pH and Exchangeable Al to Alum and Lime Amendments
title_full_unstemmed The Response of Soil pH and Exchangeable Al to Alum and Lime Amendments
title_short The Response of Soil pH and Exchangeable Al to Alum and Lime Amendments
title_sort response of soil ph and exchangeable al to alum and lime amendments
topic exchangeable aluminum
aluminum saturation
buffer index
dissolved organic carbon
soil organic matter
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/6/547
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherjorellegillespie theresponseofsoilphandexchangeablealtoalumandlimeamendments
AT joaoarthurantonangelo theresponseofsoilphandexchangeablealtoalumandlimeamendments
AT hailinzhang theresponseofsoilphandexchangeablealtoalumandlimeamendments
AT christopherjorellegillespie responseofsoilphandexchangeablealtoalumandlimeamendments
AT joaoarthurantonangelo responseofsoilphandexchangeablealtoalumandlimeamendments
AT hailinzhang responseofsoilphandexchangeablealtoalumandlimeamendments