What might judgment and decision making research be like if we took a Bayesian approach to hypothesis testing?
Judgment and decision making research overwhelmingly uses null hypothesis significance testing as the basis for statistical inference. This article examines an alternative, Bayesian approach which emphasizes the choice between two competing hypotheses and quantifies the balance of evidence provided...
Main Authors: | William J. Matthews, Andreas Glöckner, Benjamin E. Hilbig |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2011-12-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500004265/type/journal_article |
Similar Items
-
What would judgment and decision making research be like if we took a Bayesian approach to hypothesis testing?
by: William J. Matthews
Published: (2011-12-01) -
Frequentist and Bayesian Hypothesis Testing: An Intuitive Guide for Urologists and Clinicians
by: José Gaona, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
The posterior probability of a null hypothesis given a statistically significant result
by: Schad, Daniel J., et al.
Published: (2022-07-01) -
Bayesian alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing in biomedical research: a non-technical introduction to Bayesian inference with JASP
by: Riko Kelter
Published: (2020-06-01) -
A logical analysis of null hypothesis significance testing using popular terminology
by: Richard McNulty
Published: (2022-09-01)