Soil Contaminant Concentrations at Urban Agricultural Sites in New Orleans, Louisiana

Along with the many benefits of urban agriculture comes the possible exposure to contaminants not typically seen in rural soils. Through the use of standard laboratory analyses (ICP-AES and CVAAS) and a field-portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF) calibrated for soil analysis, this study qua...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kyle M. Moller, James G. Hartwell, Bridget R. Simon-Friedt, Mark J. Wilson, Jeffrey K. Wickliffe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems 2018-06-01
Series:Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/586
_version_ 1827882947369238528
author Kyle M. Moller
James G. Hartwell
Bridget R. Simon-Friedt
Mark J. Wilson
Jeffrey K. Wickliffe
author_facet Kyle M. Moller
James G. Hartwell
Bridget R. Simon-Friedt
Mark J. Wilson
Jeffrey K. Wickliffe
author_sort Kyle M. Moller
collection DOAJ
description Along with the many benefits of urban agriculture comes the possible exposure to contaminants not typically seen in rural soils. Through the use of standard laboratory analyses (ICP-AES and CVAAS) and a field-portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF) calibrated for soil analysis, this study quantified contamination levels at urban agricultural sites throughout New Orleans, Louisiana. The results of the standard laboratory analyses were compared to the results from the XRF.  We collected soil samples at 27 urban and suburban farm and garden sites from the Greater New Orleans area. We analyzed the soil samples for arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, mercury, lead, nickel, and zinc using the XRF and standard methods. Most sites had median con­centrations significantly below Louisiana’s soil standards. Paired soil samples showed XRF results were significantly higher than laboratory results for all metals but copper. Only lead (ρ=0.82, p<0.0001) and zinc (ρ=0.78, p=0.0001) were highly correlated. Poor correlation of results between XRF and standard methods make the standard methods preferred.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T19:04:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ae113465b223409793924f90f6b64bd6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2152-0801
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T19:04:31Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems
record_format Article
series Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
spelling doaj.art-ae113465b223409793924f90f6b64bd62023-08-02T06:22:45ZengLyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food SystemsJournal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development2152-08012018-06-018210.5304/jafscd.2018.082.010586Soil Contaminant Concentrations at Urban Agricultural Sites in New Orleans, LouisianaKyle M. Moller0James G. Hartwell1Bridget R. Simon-Friedt2Mark J. Wilson3Jeffrey K. Wickliffe4Tulane UniversityTulane UniversityTulane UniversityTulane UniversityTulane UniversityAlong with the many benefits of urban agriculture comes the possible exposure to contaminants not typically seen in rural soils. Through the use of standard laboratory analyses (ICP-AES and CVAAS) and a field-portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF) calibrated for soil analysis, this study quantified contamination levels at urban agricultural sites throughout New Orleans, Louisiana. The results of the standard laboratory analyses were compared to the results from the XRF.  We collected soil samples at 27 urban and suburban farm and garden sites from the Greater New Orleans area. We analyzed the soil samples for arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, mercury, lead, nickel, and zinc using the XRF and standard methods. Most sites had median con­centrations significantly below Louisiana’s soil standards. Paired soil samples showed XRF results were significantly higher than laboratory results for all metals but copper. Only lead (ρ=0.82, p<0.0001) and zinc (ρ=0.78, p=0.0001) were highly correlated. Poor correlation of results between XRF and standard methods make the standard methods preferred.https://www.foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/586ICP-AESLeadArsenicXRFSoil ContaminationUrban Agriculture
spellingShingle Kyle M. Moller
James G. Hartwell
Bridget R. Simon-Friedt
Mark J. Wilson
Jeffrey K. Wickliffe
Soil Contaminant Concentrations at Urban Agricultural Sites in New Orleans, Louisiana
Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
ICP-AES
Lead
Arsenic
XRF
Soil Contamination
Urban Agriculture
title Soil Contaminant Concentrations at Urban Agricultural Sites in New Orleans, Louisiana
title_full Soil Contaminant Concentrations at Urban Agricultural Sites in New Orleans, Louisiana
title_fullStr Soil Contaminant Concentrations at Urban Agricultural Sites in New Orleans, Louisiana
title_full_unstemmed Soil Contaminant Concentrations at Urban Agricultural Sites in New Orleans, Louisiana
title_short Soil Contaminant Concentrations at Urban Agricultural Sites in New Orleans, Louisiana
title_sort soil contaminant concentrations at urban agricultural sites in new orleans louisiana
topic ICP-AES
Lead
Arsenic
XRF
Soil Contamination
Urban Agriculture
url https://www.foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/586
work_keys_str_mv AT kylemmoller soilcontaminantconcentrationsaturbanagriculturalsitesinneworleanslouisiana
AT jamesghartwell soilcontaminantconcentrationsaturbanagriculturalsitesinneworleanslouisiana
AT bridgetrsimonfriedt soilcontaminantconcentrationsaturbanagriculturalsitesinneworleanslouisiana
AT markjwilson soilcontaminantconcentrationsaturbanagriculturalsitesinneworleanslouisiana
AT jeffreykwickliffe soilcontaminantconcentrationsaturbanagriculturalsitesinneworleanslouisiana