Soil Contaminant Concentrations at Urban Agricultural Sites in New Orleans, Louisiana
Along with the many benefits of urban agriculture comes the possible exposure to contaminants not typically seen in rural soils. Through the use of standard laboratory analyses (ICP-AES and CVAAS) and a field-portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF) calibrated for soil analysis, this study qua...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems
2018-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/586 |
_version_ | 1827882947369238528 |
---|---|
author | Kyle M. Moller James G. Hartwell Bridget R. Simon-Friedt Mark J. Wilson Jeffrey K. Wickliffe |
author_facet | Kyle M. Moller James G. Hartwell Bridget R. Simon-Friedt Mark J. Wilson Jeffrey K. Wickliffe |
author_sort | Kyle M. Moller |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Along with the many benefits of urban agriculture comes the possible exposure to contaminants not typically seen in rural soils. Through the use of standard laboratory analyses (ICP-AES and CVAAS) and a field-portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF) calibrated for soil analysis, this study quantified contamination levels at urban agricultural sites throughout New Orleans, Louisiana. The results of the standard laboratory analyses were compared to the results from the XRF. We collected soil samples at 27 urban and suburban farm and garden sites from the Greater New Orleans area. We analyzed the soil samples for arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, mercury, lead, nickel, and zinc using the XRF and standard methods. Most sites had median concentrations significantly below Louisiana’s soil standards. Paired soil samples showed XRF results were significantly higher than laboratory results for all metals but copper. Only lead (ρ=0.82, p<0.0001) and zinc (ρ=0.78, p=0.0001) were highly correlated. Poor correlation of results between XRF and standard methods make the standard methods preferred. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T19:04:31Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ae113465b223409793924f90f6b64bd6 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2152-0801 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T19:04:31Z |
publishDate | 2018-06-01 |
publisher | Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development |
spelling | doaj.art-ae113465b223409793924f90f6b64bd62023-08-02T06:22:45ZengLyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food SystemsJournal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development2152-08012018-06-018210.5304/jafscd.2018.082.010586Soil Contaminant Concentrations at Urban Agricultural Sites in New Orleans, LouisianaKyle M. Moller0James G. Hartwell1Bridget R. Simon-Friedt2Mark J. Wilson3Jeffrey K. Wickliffe4Tulane UniversityTulane UniversityTulane UniversityTulane UniversityTulane UniversityAlong with the many benefits of urban agriculture comes the possible exposure to contaminants not typically seen in rural soils. Through the use of standard laboratory analyses (ICP-AES and CVAAS) and a field-portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF) calibrated for soil analysis, this study quantified contamination levels at urban agricultural sites throughout New Orleans, Louisiana. The results of the standard laboratory analyses were compared to the results from the XRF. We collected soil samples at 27 urban and suburban farm and garden sites from the Greater New Orleans area. We analyzed the soil samples for arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, mercury, lead, nickel, and zinc using the XRF and standard methods. Most sites had median concentrations significantly below Louisiana’s soil standards. Paired soil samples showed XRF results were significantly higher than laboratory results for all metals but copper. Only lead (ρ=0.82, p<0.0001) and zinc (ρ=0.78, p=0.0001) were highly correlated. Poor correlation of results between XRF and standard methods make the standard methods preferred.https://www.foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/586ICP-AESLeadArsenicXRFSoil ContaminationUrban Agriculture |
spellingShingle | Kyle M. Moller James G. Hartwell Bridget R. Simon-Friedt Mark J. Wilson Jeffrey K. Wickliffe Soil Contaminant Concentrations at Urban Agricultural Sites in New Orleans, Louisiana Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development ICP-AES Lead Arsenic XRF Soil Contamination Urban Agriculture |
title | Soil Contaminant Concentrations at Urban Agricultural Sites in New Orleans, Louisiana |
title_full | Soil Contaminant Concentrations at Urban Agricultural Sites in New Orleans, Louisiana |
title_fullStr | Soil Contaminant Concentrations at Urban Agricultural Sites in New Orleans, Louisiana |
title_full_unstemmed | Soil Contaminant Concentrations at Urban Agricultural Sites in New Orleans, Louisiana |
title_short | Soil Contaminant Concentrations at Urban Agricultural Sites in New Orleans, Louisiana |
title_sort | soil contaminant concentrations at urban agricultural sites in new orleans louisiana |
topic | ICP-AES Lead Arsenic XRF Soil Contamination Urban Agriculture |
url | https://www.foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/586 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kylemmoller soilcontaminantconcentrationsaturbanagriculturalsitesinneworleanslouisiana AT jamesghartwell soilcontaminantconcentrationsaturbanagriculturalsitesinneworleanslouisiana AT bridgetrsimonfriedt soilcontaminantconcentrationsaturbanagriculturalsitesinneworleanslouisiana AT markjwilson soilcontaminantconcentrationsaturbanagriculturalsitesinneworleanslouisiana AT jeffreykwickliffe soilcontaminantconcentrationsaturbanagriculturalsitesinneworleanslouisiana |