Facilitating EMA binding test performance using fluorescent beads combined with next‐generation sequencing

Abstract The eosin‐5′‐maleimide (EMA) binding test is widely used as diagnostic test for hereditary spherocytosis (HS), one of the most common haemolytic disorders in Caucasian populations. We recently described the advantages of replacing the use of healthy control blood samples with fluorescent be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas Glenthøj, Christian Brieghel, Amina Nardo‐Marino, Richard vanWijk, Henrik Birgens, Jesper Petersen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-11-01
Series:eJHaem
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jha2.277
_version_ 1797740123349057536
author Andreas Glenthøj
Christian Brieghel
Amina Nardo‐Marino
Richard vanWijk
Henrik Birgens
Jesper Petersen
author_facet Andreas Glenthøj
Christian Brieghel
Amina Nardo‐Marino
Richard vanWijk
Henrik Birgens
Jesper Petersen
author_sort Andreas Glenthøj
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The eosin‐5′‐maleimide (EMA) binding test is widely used as diagnostic test for hereditary spherocytosis (HS), one of the most common haemolytic disorders in Caucasian populations. We recently described the advantages of replacing the use of healthy control blood samples with fluorescent beads in a modified EMA binding assay. In this study we further explore this novel approach. We performed targeted next‐generation sequencing, modified EMA binding test and osmotic gradient ektacytometry on consecutive individuals referred to our laboratory on the suspicion of HS. In total, 33 of 95 carried a (likely) pathogenic variant, and 24 had variants of uncertain significance (VUS). We identified a total 79 different (likely) pathogenic variants and VUS, including 43 novel mutations. Discarding VUS and recessive mutations in STPA1, we used the occurrence of (likely) pathogenic variants to generate a diagnostic threshold for our modified EMA binding test. Twenty‐one of 23 individuals with non‐SPTA1 (likely) pathogenic variants had EMA ≥ 43.6 AU, which was the optimal threshold in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Accuracy was excellent at 93.4% and close to that of osmotic gradient ektacytometry (98.7%). In conclusion, we were able to simplify the EMA‐binding test by using rainbow beads as reference and (likely) pathogenic variants to define an accurate cut‐off value.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T14:08:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ae1d224784b14e03990957bcb80e71ca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2688-6146
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T14:08:01Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series eJHaem
spelling doaj.art-ae1d224784b14e03990957bcb80e71ca2023-08-21T14:05:23ZengWileyeJHaem2688-61462021-11-012471672810.1002/jha2.277Facilitating EMA binding test performance using fluorescent beads combined with next‐generation sequencingAndreas Glenthøj0Christian Brieghel1Amina Nardo‐Marino2Richard vanWijk3Henrik Birgens4Jesper Petersen5Centre for Haemoglobinopathies Department of Haematology Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen DenmarkCentre for Haemoglobinopathies Department of Haematology Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen DenmarkCentre for Haemoglobinopathies Department of Haematology Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen DenmarkCentral Diagnostic Laboratory‐Research University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht University Utrecht The NetherlandsCentre for Haemoglobinopathies Department of Haematology Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen DenmarkCentre for Haemoglobinopathies Department of Haematology Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen DenmarkAbstract The eosin‐5′‐maleimide (EMA) binding test is widely used as diagnostic test for hereditary spherocytosis (HS), one of the most common haemolytic disorders in Caucasian populations. We recently described the advantages of replacing the use of healthy control blood samples with fluorescent beads in a modified EMA binding assay. In this study we further explore this novel approach. We performed targeted next‐generation sequencing, modified EMA binding test and osmotic gradient ektacytometry on consecutive individuals referred to our laboratory on the suspicion of HS. In total, 33 of 95 carried a (likely) pathogenic variant, and 24 had variants of uncertain significance (VUS). We identified a total 79 different (likely) pathogenic variants and VUS, including 43 novel mutations. Discarding VUS and recessive mutations in STPA1, we used the occurrence of (likely) pathogenic variants to generate a diagnostic threshold for our modified EMA binding test. Twenty‐one of 23 individuals with non‐SPTA1 (likely) pathogenic variants had EMA ≥ 43.6 AU, which was the optimal threshold in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Accuracy was excellent at 93.4% and close to that of osmotic gradient ektacytometry (98.7%). In conclusion, we were able to simplify the EMA‐binding test by using rainbow beads as reference and (likely) pathogenic variants to define an accurate cut‐off value.https://doi.org/10.1002/jha2.277haemolytic anaemiahereditary anaemiaslaboratory haematologyrbc membranespherocytosis
spellingShingle Andreas Glenthøj
Christian Brieghel
Amina Nardo‐Marino
Richard vanWijk
Henrik Birgens
Jesper Petersen
Facilitating EMA binding test performance using fluorescent beads combined with next‐generation sequencing
eJHaem
haemolytic anaemia
hereditary anaemias
laboratory haematology
rbc membrane
spherocytosis
title Facilitating EMA binding test performance using fluorescent beads combined with next‐generation sequencing
title_full Facilitating EMA binding test performance using fluorescent beads combined with next‐generation sequencing
title_fullStr Facilitating EMA binding test performance using fluorescent beads combined with next‐generation sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Facilitating EMA binding test performance using fluorescent beads combined with next‐generation sequencing
title_short Facilitating EMA binding test performance using fluorescent beads combined with next‐generation sequencing
title_sort facilitating ema binding test performance using fluorescent beads combined with next generation sequencing
topic haemolytic anaemia
hereditary anaemias
laboratory haematology
rbc membrane
spherocytosis
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jha2.277
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasglenthøj facilitatingemabindingtestperformanceusingfluorescentbeadscombinedwithnextgenerationsequencing
AT christianbrieghel facilitatingemabindingtestperformanceusingfluorescentbeadscombinedwithnextgenerationsequencing
AT aminanardomarino facilitatingemabindingtestperformanceusingfluorescentbeadscombinedwithnextgenerationsequencing
AT richardvanwijk facilitatingemabindingtestperformanceusingfluorescentbeadscombinedwithnextgenerationsequencing
AT henrikbirgens facilitatingemabindingtestperformanceusingfluorescentbeadscombinedwithnextgenerationsequencing
AT jesperpetersen facilitatingemabindingtestperformanceusingfluorescentbeadscombinedwithnextgenerationsequencing