Single-incision robotic colectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: A matched case control study
Background: Single incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) and single incision robotic colectomy (SIRC) are both advanced minimally invasive operative techniques. However, studies comparing these two surgical methods have not been published. The purpose of this study is to compare and evaluate the sh...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2021-05-01
|
| Series: | Asian Journal of Surgery |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958421000257 |
| _version_ | 1823940473023102976 |
|---|---|
| author | Tung-Cheng Chang En-Kwang Lin Yen-Jung Lu Ming-Te Huang Chien-Hsin Chen |
| author_facet | Tung-Cheng Chang En-Kwang Lin Yen-Jung Lu Ming-Te Huang Chien-Hsin Chen |
| author_sort | Tung-Cheng Chang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Single incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) and single incision robotic colectomy (SIRC) are both advanced minimally invasive operative techniques. However, studies comparing these two surgical methods have not been published. The purpose of this study is to compare and evaluate the short-term outcomes of SIRC with those of SILC. Methods: A total of 21 consecutive patients underwent SIRC and 136 consecutive patients underwent SILC in separate institutes between January 2013 and December 2019. We used retrospective cohort matching to analyze these patients. Results: Prior to matching, patients who underwent SIRC had a lower percentage of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades III–IV (5% vs. 19%, P = 0.11) compared with patients who underwent SILC. The SIRC group revealed a higher proportion of sigmoid colon lesions and anterior resections than the SILC group (61% vs. 45%, P = 0.16). After 1:4 cohort matching, 21 patients were enrolled in the SIRC group and 84 patients were enrolled in the SILC group. No statistically significant difference in terms of operative time (SIRC: 185 ± 46 min, SILC: 208 ± 53 min; P = 0.51), estimated blood loss (SIRC: 12 ± 22 ml, SILC: 85 ± 234 ml; P = 0.12), and complications (SIRC: 4.7%, SIRC: 7.1%; P = 0.31) was observed between these groups. Length of postoperative hospital stay (SIRC: 8.3 ± 1.7 days, SILC: 9.3 ± 6.5; P = 0.10) and number of harvested lymph nodes (SIRC: 21.3 ± 10.3, SILC: 21.3 ± 9.5; P = 0.77) were also similar between the two groups. In subgroup analysis, numbers of harvested lymph node is less in SIRC than SILC (SIRC: 18.1 ± 4.7 vs. SILC: 18.9 ± 8.1, P = 0.04) in anterior resection. Conclusion: SIRC and SILC are safe and feasible procedures with similar surgical and pathological outcomes for right- and left-side colectomy. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-17T04:13:53Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ae1f5ad9a2df453a9fc5959873318809 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1015-9584 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-17T04:13:53Z |
| publishDate | 2021-05-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Asian Journal of Surgery |
| spelling | doaj.art-ae1f5ad9a2df453a9fc59598733188092022-12-21T22:04:06ZengElsevierAsian Journal of Surgery1015-95842021-05-01445749754Single-incision robotic colectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: A matched case control studyTung-Cheng Chang0En-Kwang Lin1Yen-Jung Lu2Ming-Te Huang3Chien-Hsin Chen4Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University Shuang-Ho Hospital, Number 291 Zhongzheng Road, Zhonghe District, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, TaiwanDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, WanFang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, No.111 Sec. 3 Xinglong Rd., Wenshan Dist., Taipei, TaiwanDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, WanFang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, No.111 Sec. 3 Xinglong Rd., Wenshan Dist., Taipei, TaiwanDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University Shuang-Ho Hospital, Number 291 Zhongzheng Road, Zhonghe District, Taipei, TaiwanDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, WanFang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, No.111 Sec. 3 Xinglong Rd., Wenshan Dist., Taipei, Taiwan; Corresponding author.Background: Single incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) and single incision robotic colectomy (SIRC) are both advanced minimally invasive operative techniques. However, studies comparing these two surgical methods have not been published. The purpose of this study is to compare and evaluate the short-term outcomes of SIRC with those of SILC. Methods: A total of 21 consecutive patients underwent SIRC and 136 consecutive patients underwent SILC in separate institutes between January 2013 and December 2019. We used retrospective cohort matching to analyze these patients. Results: Prior to matching, patients who underwent SIRC had a lower percentage of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades III–IV (5% vs. 19%, P = 0.11) compared with patients who underwent SILC. The SIRC group revealed a higher proportion of sigmoid colon lesions and anterior resections than the SILC group (61% vs. 45%, P = 0.16). After 1:4 cohort matching, 21 patients were enrolled in the SIRC group and 84 patients were enrolled in the SILC group. No statistically significant difference in terms of operative time (SIRC: 185 ± 46 min, SILC: 208 ± 53 min; P = 0.51), estimated blood loss (SIRC: 12 ± 22 ml, SILC: 85 ± 234 ml; P = 0.12), and complications (SIRC: 4.7%, SIRC: 7.1%; P = 0.31) was observed between these groups. Length of postoperative hospital stay (SIRC: 8.3 ± 1.7 days, SILC: 9.3 ± 6.5; P = 0.10) and number of harvested lymph nodes (SIRC: 21.3 ± 10.3, SILC: 21.3 ± 9.5; P = 0.77) were also similar between the two groups. In subgroup analysis, numbers of harvested lymph node is less in SIRC than SILC (SIRC: 18.1 ± 4.7 vs. SILC: 18.9 ± 8.1, P = 0.04) in anterior resection. Conclusion: SIRC and SILC are safe and feasible procedures with similar surgical and pathological outcomes for right- and left-side colectomy.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958421000257Single-incisionRobotic colectomyLaparoscopic colectomyMinimal invasive surgeryColon cancer |
| spellingShingle | Tung-Cheng Chang En-Kwang Lin Yen-Jung Lu Ming-Te Huang Chien-Hsin Chen Single-incision robotic colectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: A matched case control study Asian Journal of Surgery Single-incision Robotic colectomy Laparoscopic colectomy Minimal invasive surgery Colon cancer |
| title | Single-incision robotic colectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: A matched case control study |
| title_full | Single-incision robotic colectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: A matched case control study |
| title_fullStr | Single-incision robotic colectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: A matched case control study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Single-incision robotic colectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: A matched case control study |
| title_short | Single-incision robotic colectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: A matched case control study |
| title_sort | single incision robotic colectomy versus single incision laparoscopic colectomy a matched case control study |
| topic | Single-incision Robotic colectomy Laparoscopic colectomy Minimal invasive surgery Colon cancer |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958421000257 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tungchengchang singleincisionroboticcolectomyversussingleincisionlaparoscopiccolectomyamatchedcasecontrolstudy AT enkwanglin singleincisionroboticcolectomyversussingleincisionlaparoscopiccolectomyamatchedcasecontrolstudy AT yenjunglu singleincisionroboticcolectomyversussingleincisionlaparoscopiccolectomyamatchedcasecontrolstudy AT mingtehuang singleincisionroboticcolectomyversussingleincisionlaparoscopiccolectomyamatchedcasecontrolstudy AT chienhsinchen singleincisionroboticcolectomyversussingleincisionlaparoscopiccolectomyamatchedcasecontrolstudy |