Indoor residual spraying with microencapsulated DEET repellent (N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide) for control of Anopheles arabiensis and Culex quinquefasciatus

Abstract Background Evolution of insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae complex necessitates evaluation of alternative chemical classes to complement existing insecticides for long lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) and indoor residual spraying (IRS). Microencapsulated (MC) DEET (N, N-diethyl-m-t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jovin Kitau, Richard Oxborough, Johnson Matowo, Franklin Mosha, Stephen M Magesa, Mark Rowland
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2014-09-01
Series:Parasites & Vectors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-446
_version_ 1797811704381308928
author Jovin Kitau
Richard Oxborough
Johnson Matowo
Franklin Mosha
Stephen M Magesa
Mark Rowland
author_facet Jovin Kitau
Richard Oxborough
Johnson Matowo
Franklin Mosha
Stephen M Magesa
Mark Rowland
author_sort Jovin Kitau
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Evolution of insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae complex necessitates evaluation of alternative chemical classes to complement existing insecticides for long lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) and indoor residual spraying (IRS). Microencapsulated (MC) DEET (N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide) is a formulation of the popular repellent, which gives long lasting activity when applied to nets. Its suitability for IRS use has not been evaluated before. This study assessed the efficacy of DEET MC, for IRS in experimental huts. Methods DEET MC was tested alongside standard repellent and non-repellent residual insecticides: lambdacyhalothrin, permethrin, pirimiphos methyl and DDT. Residual formulations of these compounds were sprayed on plywood panels attached to walls of experimental huts to assess efficacy against pyrethroid resistant, wild free-flying Anopheles arabiensis and Culex quinquefasciatus. The panel treatments were rotated weekly between huts. Results The overall mortalities of An. arabiensis induced by the various treatments (range: 76-86%) were significantly greater than mortality in the untreated control (8%, P < 0.001). Mortality of An. arabiensis in DEET sprayed huts (82%) was higher than in lambdacyhalothrin CS (76%, P = 0.043) but not significantly different to pirimiphos methyl CS (86%, P = 0.204) or DDT huts (81%, P = 0.703). Against Cx. quinquefasciatus DEET MC was less effective, inducing lower mortality (29%) than other treatments. An arabiensis blood feeding rates were higher in the unsprayed control (34%) than in sprayed huts (range between treatments: 19-22%, P < 0.002), and DEET provided equivalent or superior blood feeding inhibition (44%) to other insecticides. Against Cx. quinquefasciatus there was no significant reduction in blood-feeding for any treatment relative to the control. There was a significantly higher exiting of An. arabiensis from huts sprayed with DEET (98%), lambdacyhalothrin (98%) and permethrin (96%) relative to the control (80%, P < 0.01). Exiting rates of Cx. quinquefasciatus did not differ between treatment huts and the control. Conclusion Microencapsulated DEET acts like an insecticide at ambient temperature and induces mosquito mortality when applied to walls made from wooden panels. This trial demonstrated the potential of microencapsulated DEET to control An. arabiensis and warrants further studies of residual activity on interior substrates.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T07:27:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ae252646678a429987d74fb5d3feaf58
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1756-3305
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T07:27:40Z
publishDate 2014-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Parasites & Vectors
spelling doaj.art-ae252646678a429987d74fb5d3feaf582023-06-04T11:19:34ZengBMCParasites & Vectors1756-33052014-09-017111110.1186/1756-3305-7-446Indoor residual spraying with microencapsulated DEET repellent (N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide) for control of Anopheles arabiensis and Culex quinquefasciatusJovin Kitau0Richard Oxborough1Johnson Matowo2Franklin Mosha3Stephen M Magesa4Mark Rowland5Department of Entomology and Parasitology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College (KCMUCo)Pan-African Malaria Vector Research Consortium, (PAMVERC)Department of Entomology and Parasitology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College (KCMUCo)Department of Entomology and Parasitology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College (KCMUCo)Pan-African Malaria Vector Research Consortium, (PAMVERC)Pan-African Malaria Vector Research Consortium, (PAMVERC)Abstract Background Evolution of insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae complex necessitates evaluation of alternative chemical classes to complement existing insecticides for long lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) and indoor residual spraying (IRS). Microencapsulated (MC) DEET (N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide) is a formulation of the popular repellent, which gives long lasting activity when applied to nets. Its suitability for IRS use has not been evaluated before. This study assessed the efficacy of DEET MC, for IRS in experimental huts. Methods DEET MC was tested alongside standard repellent and non-repellent residual insecticides: lambdacyhalothrin, permethrin, pirimiphos methyl and DDT. Residual formulations of these compounds were sprayed on plywood panels attached to walls of experimental huts to assess efficacy against pyrethroid resistant, wild free-flying Anopheles arabiensis and Culex quinquefasciatus. The panel treatments were rotated weekly between huts. Results The overall mortalities of An. arabiensis induced by the various treatments (range: 76-86%) were significantly greater than mortality in the untreated control (8%, P < 0.001). Mortality of An. arabiensis in DEET sprayed huts (82%) was higher than in lambdacyhalothrin CS (76%, P = 0.043) but not significantly different to pirimiphos methyl CS (86%, P = 0.204) or DDT huts (81%, P = 0.703). Against Cx. quinquefasciatus DEET MC was less effective, inducing lower mortality (29%) than other treatments. An arabiensis blood feeding rates were higher in the unsprayed control (34%) than in sprayed huts (range between treatments: 19-22%, P < 0.002), and DEET provided equivalent or superior blood feeding inhibition (44%) to other insecticides. Against Cx. quinquefasciatus there was no significant reduction in blood-feeding for any treatment relative to the control. There was a significantly higher exiting of An. arabiensis from huts sprayed with DEET (98%), lambdacyhalothrin (98%) and permethrin (96%) relative to the control (80%, P < 0.01). Exiting rates of Cx. quinquefasciatus did not differ between treatment huts and the control. Conclusion Microencapsulated DEET acts like an insecticide at ambient temperature and induces mosquito mortality when applied to walls made from wooden panels. This trial demonstrated the potential of microencapsulated DEET to control An. arabiensis and warrants further studies of residual activity on interior substrates.https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-446Indoor residual sprayingDEETRepellentAnopheles arabiensisCulex quinquefasciatus
spellingShingle Jovin Kitau
Richard Oxborough
Johnson Matowo
Franklin Mosha
Stephen M Magesa
Mark Rowland
Indoor residual spraying with microencapsulated DEET repellent (N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide) for control of Anopheles arabiensis and Culex quinquefasciatus
Parasites & Vectors
Indoor residual spraying
DEET
Repellent
Anopheles arabiensis
Culex quinquefasciatus
title Indoor residual spraying with microencapsulated DEET repellent (N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide) for control of Anopheles arabiensis and Culex quinquefasciatus
title_full Indoor residual spraying with microencapsulated DEET repellent (N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide) for control of Anopheles arabiensis and Culex quinquefasciatus
title_fullStr Indoor residual spraying with microencapsulated DEET repellent (N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide) for control of Anopheles arabiensis and Culex quinquefasciatus
title_full_unstemmed Indoor residual spraying with microencapsulated DEET repellent (N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide) for control of Anopheles arabiensis and Culex quinquefasciatus
title_short Indoor residual spraying with microencapsulated DEET repellent (N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide) for control of Anopheles arabiensis and Culex quinquefasciatus
title_sort indoor residual spraying with microencapsulated deet repellent n n diethyl m toluamide for control of anopheles arabiensis and culex quinquefasciatus
topic Indoor residual spraying
DEET
Repellent
Anopheles arabiensis
Culex quinquefasciatus
url https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-446
work_keys_str_mv AT jovinkitau indoorresidualsprayingwithmicroencapsulateddeetrepellentnndiethylmtoluamideforcontrolofanophelesarabiensisandculexquinquefasciatus
AT richardoxborough indoorresidualsprayingwithmicroencapsulateddeetrepellentnndiethylmtoluamideforcontrolofanophelesarabiensisandculexquinquefasciatus
AT johnsonmatowo indoorresidualsprayingwithmicroencapsulateddeetrepellentnndiethylmtoluamideforcontrolofanophelesarabiensisandculexquinquefasciatus
AT franklinmosha indoorresidualsprayingwithmicroencapsulateddeetrepellentnndiethylmtoluamideforcontrolofanophelesarabiensisandculexquinquefasciatus
AT stephenmmagesa indoorresidualsprayingwithmicroencapsulateddeetrepellentnndiethylmtoluamideforcontrolofanophelesarabiensisandculexquinquefasciatus
AT markrowland indoorresidualsprayingwithmicroencapsulateddeetrepellentnndiethylmtoluamideforcontrolofanophelesarabiensisandculexquinquefasciatus