Carbon and Energy Footprints of Prefabricated Industrial Buildings: A Systematic Life Cycle Assessment Analysis

A systematic analysis of green-house gases emission (carbon footprint) and primary energy consumption (energy footprint) of prefabricated industrial buildings during their entire life cycle is presented. The life cycle assessment (LCA) study was performed in a cradle-to grave approach: site-specific...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emanuele Bonamente, Franco Cotana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-11-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/11/12333
_version_ 1798040288295387136
author Emanuele Bonamente
Franco Cotana
author_facet Emanuele Bonamente
Franco Cotana
author_sort Emanuele Bonamente
collection DOAJ
description A systematic analysis of green-house gases emission (carbon footprint) and primary energy consumption (energy footprint) of prefabricated industrial buildings during their entire life cycle is presented. The life cycle assessment (LCA) study was performed in a cradle-to grave approach: site-specific data from an Italian company, directly involved in all the phases from raw material manufacturing to in-situ assembly, were used to analyze the impacts as a function of different design choices. Four buildings were analyzed and results were used to setup a parameterized model that was used to study the impacts of industrial prefabricated buildings over the input parameter space. The model vs. data agreement is within 4% for both carbon and energy footprint. The functional unit is 1 m3 of prefabricated building, considering a 50-year lifetime. The results of the four buildings decrease from 144.6 kgCO2eq/m3 and 649.5 kWh/m3 down to 123.5 kgCO2eq/m3 and 556.8 kWh/m3 as the building floor area increases from 1048 m2 to 21,910 m2. The use phase accounts for the major impact (approximate 76%). It is found that the carbon footprint is proportional to the energy footprint, the proportional factor being 0.222 kgCO2eq/kWh within 0.5% accuracy. Finally, a systematic study of the sensitivity of input parameters (insulation, lifetime, foundation type) is presented.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T22:05:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ae2b0bc6acab46fbaf543ce702676cfc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T22:05:32Z
publishDate 2015-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-ae2b0bc6acab46fbaf543ce702676cfc2022-12-22T04:00:44ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732015-11-01811126851270110.3390/en81112333en81112333Carbon and Energy Footprints of Prefabricated Industrial Buildings: A Systematic Life Cycle Assessment AnalysisEmanuele Bonamente0Franco Cotana1CIRIAF—Interuniversity Research Center on Pollution and Environment “M. Felli”, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Via G. Duranti 67, 06125 Perugia, ItalyCIRIAF—Interuniversity Research Center on Pollution and Environment “M. Felli”, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Via G. Duranti 67, 06125 Perugia, ItalyA systematic analysis of green-house gases emission (carbon footprint) and primary energy consumption (energy footprint) of prefabricated industrial buildings during their entire life cycle is presented. The life cycle assessment (LCA) study was performed in a cradle-to grave approach: site-specific data from an Italian company, directly involved in all the phases from raw material manufacturing to in-situ assembly, were used to analyze the impacts as a function of different design choices. Four buildings were analyzed and results were used to setup a parameterized model that was used to study the impacts of industrial prefabricated buildings over the input parameter space. The model vs. data agreement is within 4% for both carbon and energy footprint. The functional unit is 1 m3 of prefabricated building, considering a 50-year lifetime. The results of the four buildings decrease from 144.6 kgCO2eq/m3 and 649.5 kWh/m3 down to 123.5 kgCO2eq/m3 and 556.8 kWh/m3 as the building floor area increases from 1048 m2 to 21,910 m2. The use phase accounts for the major impact (approximate 76%). It is found that the carbon footprint is proportional to the energy footprint, the proportional factor being 0.222 kgCO2eq/kWh within 0.5% accuracy. Finally, a systematic study of the sensitivity of input parameters (insulation, lifetime, foundation type) is presented.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/11/12333carbon footprintenergy footprintindustrial buildingsprefabricated buildingslife cycle assessment (LCA)
spellingShingle Emanuele Bonamente
Franco Cotana
Carbon and Energy Footprints of Prefabricated Industrial Buildings: A Systematic Life Cycle Assessment Analysis
Energies
carbon footprint
energy footprint
industrial buildings
prefabricated buildings
life cycle assessment (LCA)
title Carbon and Energy Footprints of Prefabricated Industrial Buildings: A Systematic Life Cycle Assessment Analysis
title_full Carbon and Energy Footprints of Prefabricated Industrial Buildings: A Systematic Life Cycle Assessment Analysis
title_fullStr Carbon and Energy Footprints of Prefabricated Industrial Buildings: A Systematic Life Cycle Assessment Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Carbon and Energy Footprints of Prefabricated Industrial Buildings: A Systematic Life Cycle Assessment Analysis
title_short Carbon and Energy Footprints of Prefabricated Industrial Buildings: A Systematic Life Cycle Assessment Analysis
title_sort carbon and energy footprints of prefabricated industrial buildings a systematic life cycle assessment analysis
topic carbon footprint
energy footprint
industrial buildings
prefabricated buildings
life cycle assessment (LCA)
url http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/11/12333
work_keys_str_mv AT emanuelebonamente carbonandenergyfootprintsofprefabricatedindustrialbuildingsasystematiclifecycleassessmentanalysis
AT francocotana carbonandenergyfootprintsofprefabricatedindustrialbuildingsasystematiclifecycleassessmentanalysis