Control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement: the need for a Dworkinian Hercules judge posture
This study aims to understand new bilateral and atypical procedural agreements, examining a magistrate’s use of the dworkinian hercules stance in order to control legal transactions. Moreover, article 190 of the new Brazilian Civil Procedure Code (CPC) breaks the traditional rationalist paradigm of...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina
2018-03-01
|
| Series: | Scientia Iuris |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/27476 |
| _version_ | 1811256224611565568 |
|---|---|
| author | Alexandre De Moura Bonini Ferrer Nina Trícia Disconzi Rodrigues Richard da Silveira Maicá |
| author_facet | Alexandre De Moura Bonini Ferrer Nina Trícia Disconzi Rodrigues Richard da Silveira Maicá |
| author_sort | Alexandre De Moura Bonini Ferrer |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study aims to understand new bilateral and atypical procedural agreements, examining a magistrate’s use of the dworkinian hercules stance in order to control legal transactions. Moreover, article 190 of the new Brazilian Civil Procedure Code (CPC) breaks the traditional rationalist paradigm of the previous CPC. In addition, this research uses the philosophical hermeneutic approach. In the end, this paper concludes that article 190 of the CPC is an indication of the paradigmatic break of the rationalist understanding, specifically with the creation of private autonomy sustained on the principle of self-rule. This study also notes that the magistrate responsible for the control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement has to be in the position of “being in the procedure” as it prevents the law from being inefficacious. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T17:36:57Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ae3609f22ced417f972b8f6bed3dd77e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1415-6490 2178-8189 |
| language | Portuguese |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T17:36:57Z |
| publishDate | 2018-03-01 |
| publisher | Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Scientia Iuris |
| spelling | doaj.art-ae3609f22ced417f972b8f6bed3dd77e2022-12-22T03:22:56ZporUniversidade Estadual de LondrinaScientia Iuris1415-64902178-81892018-03-012217410010.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n1p7417106Control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement: the need for a Dworkinian Hercules judge postureAlexandre De Moura Bonini Ferrer0Nina Trícia Disconzi Rodrigues1Richard da Silveira Maicá2Universidade Federal de Santa MariaUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaThis study aims to understand new bilateral and atypical procedural agreements, examining a magistrate’s use of the dworkinian hercules stance in order to control legal transactions. Moreover, article 190 of the new Brazilian Civil Procedure Code (CPC) breaks the traditional rationalist paradigm of the previous CPC. In addition, this research uses the philosophical hermeneutic approach. In the end, this paper concludes that article 190 of the CPC is an indication of the paradigmatic break of the rationalist understanding, specifically with the creation of private autonomy sustained on the principle of self-rule. This study also notes that the magistrate responsible for the control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement has to be in the position of “being in the procedure” as it prevents the law from being inefficacious.http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/27476RacionalismoJuiz HérculesDworkinNegócio Jurídico Pré-Processual Bilateral AtípicoNovo Código de Processo Civil Brasileiro |
| spellingShingle | Alexandre De Moura Bonini Ferrer Nina Trícia Disconzi Rodrigues Richard da Silveira Maicá Control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement: the need for a Dworkinian Hercules judge posture Scientia Iuris Racionalismo Juiz Hércules Dworkin Negócio Jurídico Pré-Processual Bilateral Atípico Novo Código de Processo Civil Brasileiro |
| title | Control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement: the need for a Dworkinian Hercules judge posture |
| title_full | Control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement: the need for a Dworkinian Hercules judge posture |
| title_fullStr | Control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement: the need for a Dworkinian Hercules judge posture |
| title_full_unstemmed | Control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement: the need for a Dworkinian Hercules judge posture |
| title_short | Control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement: the need for a Dworkinian Hercules judge posture |
| title_sort | control of a bilateral and atypical procedural agreement the need for a dworkinian hercules judge posture |
| topic | Racionalismo Juiz Hércules Dworkin Negócio Jurídico Pré-Processual Bilateral Atípico Novo Código de Processo Civil Brasileiro |
| url | http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/27476 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alexandredemouraboniniferrer controlofabilateralandatypicalproceduralagreementtheneedforadworkinianherculesjudgeposture AT ninatriciadisconzirodrigues controlofabilateralandatypicalproceduralagreementtheneedforadworkinianherculesjudgeposture AT richarddasilveiramaica controlofabilateralandatypicalproceduralagreementtheneedforadworkinianherculesjudgeposture |