Are v1 simple cells optimized for visual occlusions? A comparative study.

Simple cells in primary visual cortex were famously found to respond to low-level image components such as edges. Sparse coding and independent component analysis (ICA) emerged as the standard computational models for simple cell coding because they linked their receptive fields to the statistics of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jörg Bornschein, Marc Henniges, Jörg Lücke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3675001?pdf=render
_version_ 1818577891333505024
author Jörg Bornschein
Marc Henniges
Jörg Lücke
author_facet Jörg Bornschein
Marc Henniges
Jörg Lücke
author_sort Jörg Bornschein
collection DOAJ
description Simple cells in primary visual cortex were famously found to respond to low-level image components such as edges. Sparse coding and independent component analysis (ICA) emerged as the standard computational models for simple cell coding because they linked their receptive fields to the statistics of visual stimuli. However, a salient feature of image statistics, occlusions of image components, is not considered by these models. Here we ask if occlusions have an effect on the predicted shapes of simple cell receptive fields. We use a comparative approach to answer this question and investigate two models for simple cells: a standard linear model and an occlusive model. For both models we simultaneously estimate optimal receptive fields, sparsity and stimulus noise. The two models are identical except for their component superposition assumption. We find the image encoding and receptive fields predicted by the models to differ significantly. While both models predict many Gabor-like fields, the occlusive model predicts a much sparser encoding and high percentages of 'globular' receptive fields. This relatively new center-surround type of simple cell response is observed since reverse correlation is used in experimental studies. While high percentages of 'globular' fields can be obtained using specific choices of sparsity and overcompleteness in linear sparse coding, no or only low proportions are reported in the vast majority of studies on linear models (including all ICA models). Likewise, for the here investigated linear model and optimal sparsity, only low proportions of 'globular' fields are observed. In comparison, the occlusive model robustly infers high proportions and can match the experimentally observed high proportions of 'globular' fields well. Our computational study, therefore, suggests that 'globular' fields may be evidence for an optimal encoding of visual occlusions in primary visual cortex.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T06:37:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ae39401bc5e74b2cbebe0bb4b9c45af9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T06:37:07Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Computational Biology
spelling doaj.art-ae39401bc5e74b2cbebe0bb4b9c45af92022-12-21T22:40:46ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582013-01-0196e100306210.1371/journal.pcbi.1003062Are v1 simple cells optimized for visual occlusions? A comparative study.Jörg BornscheinMarc HennigesJörg LückeSimple cells in primary visual cortex were famously found to respond to low-level image components such as edges. Sparse coding and independent component analysis (ICA) emerged as the standard computational models for simple cell coding because they linked their receptive fields to the statistics of visual stimuli. However, a salient feature of image statistics, occlusions of image components, is not considered by these models. Here we ask if occlusions have an effect on the predicted shapes of simple cell receptive fields. We use a comparative approach to answer this question and investigate two models for simple cells: a standard linear model and an occlusive model. For both models we simultaneously estimate optimal receptive fields, sparsity and stimulus noise. The two models are identical except for their component superposition assumption. We find the image encoding and receptive fields predicted by the models to differ significantly. While both models predict many Gabor-like fields, the occlusive model predicts a much sparser encoding and high percentages of 'globular' receptive fields. This relatively new center-surround type of simple cell response is observed since reverse correlation is used in experimental studies. While high percentages of 'globular' fields can be obtained using specific choices of sparsity and overcompleteness in linear sparse coding, no or only low proportions are reported in the vast majority of studies on linear models (including all ICA models). Likewise, for the here investigated linear model and optimal sparsity, only low proportions of 'globular' fields are observed. In comparison, the occlusive model robustly infers high proportions and can match the experimentally observed high proportions of 'globular' fields well. Our computational study, therefore, suggests that 'globular' fields may be evidence for an optimal encoding of visual occlusions in primary visual cortex.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3675001?pdf=render
spellingShingle Jörg Bornschein
Marc Henniges
Jörg Lücke
Are v1 simple cells optimized for visual occlusions? A comparative study.
PLoS Computational Biology
title Are v1 simple cells optimized for visual occlusions? A comparative study.
title_full Are v1 simple cells optimized for visual occlusions? A comparative study.
title_fullStr Are v1 simple cells optimized for visual occlusions? A comparative study.
title_full_unstemmed Are v1 simple cells optimized for visual occlusions? A comparative study.
title_short Are v1 simple cells optimized for visual occlusions? A comparative study.
title_sort are v1 simple cells optimized for visual occlusions a comparative study
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3675001?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT jorgbornschein arev1simplecellsoptimizedforvisualocclusionsacomparativestudy
AT marchenniges arev1simplecellsoptimizedforvisualocclusionsacomparativestudy
AT jorglucke arev1simplecellsoptimizedforvisualocclusionsacomparativestudy