Interactions between Seismic Safety and Energy Efficiency for Masonry Infill Walls: A Shift of the Paradigm

Currently, the upgrade of existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings focuses only on energy retrofitting measures due to the current policies promoted in the scope of the European Green Deal. However, the structural deficiencies are not eliminated, leaving the building seriously unsafe despite the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: André Furtado, Hugo Rodrigues, António Arêde, Fernanda Rodrigues, Humberto Varum
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-04-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/3269
_version_ 1797504997566447616
author André Furtado
Hugo Rodrigues
António Arêde
Fernanda Rodrigues
Humberto Varum
author_facet André Furtado
Hugo Rodrigues
António Arêde
Fernanda Rodrigues
Humberto Varum
author_sort André Furtado
collection DOAJ
description Currently, the upgrade of existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings focuses only on energy retrofitting measures due to the current policies promoted in the scope of the European Green Deal. However, the structural deficiencies are not eliminated, leaving the building seriously unsafe despite the investment, particularly in seismic-prone regions. Moreover, the envelopes of existing RC buildings are responsible for their energy efficiency and seismic performance, but these two performance indicators are not usually correlated. They are frequently analyzed independently from each other. Based on this motivation, this research aimed to perform a holistic performance assessment of five different types of masonry infill walls (i.e., two non-strengthened walls, two walls with seismic strengthening, and one wall with energy strengthening). This performance assessment was performed in a three-step procedure: (i) energy performance assessment by analyzing the heat transfer coefficient of each wall type; (ii) seismic performance assessment by analyzing the out-of-plane seismic vulnerability; (iii) cost–benefit performance assessment. Therefore, a global analysis was performed, in which the different performance indicators (structural and energy) were evaluated. In addition, a state-of-the-art review regarding strengthening techniques (independent structural strengthening, independent energy strengthening, and combined structural plus energy strengthening) is provided. From this study, it was observed that the use of the external thermal insulation composite system reduced the heat transfer coefficient by about 77%. However, it reduced the wall strength capacity by about 9%. On the other hand, the use of textile-reinforced mortar improved the strength and deformation capacity by about 50% and 236%, but it did not sufficiently reduce the heat transfer coefficient. There is a need to combine both techniques to simultaneously improve the energy and structural energy performance parameters.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T04:12:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ae47077e5d5843f891c0ab8b8b46f8d2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T04:12:23Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-ae47077e5d5843f891c0ab8b8b46f8d22023-11-23T08:08:57ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732022-04-01159326910.3390/en15093269Interactions between Seismic Safety and Energy Efficiency for Masonry Infill Walls: A Shift of the ParadigmAndré Furtado0Hugo Rodrigues1António Arêde2Fernanda Rodrigues3Humberto Varum4CONSTRUCT-LESE, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, PortugalRISCO, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, PortugalCONSTRUCT-LESE, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, PortugalRISCO, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, PortugalCONSTRUCT-LESE, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, PortugalCurrently, the upgrade of existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings focuses only on energy retrofitting measures due to the current policies promoted in the scope of the European Green Deal. However, the structural deficiencies are not eliminated, leaving the building seriously unsafe despite the investment, particularly in seismic-prone regions. Moreover, the envelopes of existing RC buildings are responsible for their energy efficiency and seismic performance, but these two performance indicators are not usually correlated. They are frequently analyzed independently from each other. Based on this motivation, this research aimed to perform a holistic performance assessment of five different types of masonry infill walls (i.e., two non-strengthened walls, two walls with seismic strengthening, and one wall with energy strengthening). This performance assessment was performed in a three-step procedure: (i) energy performance assessment by analyzing the heat transfer coefficient of each wall type; (ii) seismic performance assessment by analyzing the out-of-plane seismic vulnerability; (iii) cost–benefit performance assessment. Therefore, a global analysis was performed, in which the different performance indicators (structural and energy) were evaluated. In addition, a state-of-the-art review regarding strengthening techniques (independent structural strengthening, independent energy strengthening, and combined structural plus energy strengthening) is provided. From this study, it was observed that the use of the external thermal insulation composite system reduced the heat transfer coefficient by about 77%. However, it reduced the wall strength capacity by about 9%. On the other hand, the use of textile-reinforced mortar improved the strength and deformation capacity by about 50% and 236%, but it did not sufficiently reduce the heat transfer coefficient. There is a need to combine both techniques to simultaneously improve the energy and structural energy performance parameters.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/3269masonry infill wallsstructural safetyenergy performancecostsstrengthening interventions
spellingShingle André Furtado
Hugo Rodrigues
António Arêde
Fernanda Rodrigues
Humberto Varum
Interactions between Seismic Safety and Energy Efficiency for Masonry Infill Walls: A Shift of the Paradigm
Energies
masonry infill walls
structural safety
energy performance
costs
strengthening interventions
title Interactions between Seismic Safety and Energy Efficiency for Masonry Infill Walls: A Shift of the Paradigm
title_full Interactions between Seismic Safety and Energy Efficiency for Masonry Infill Walls: A Shift of the Paradigm
title_fullStr Interactions between Seismic Safety and Energy Efficiency for Masonry Infill Walls: A Shift of the Paradigm
title_full_unstemmed Interactions between Seismic Safety and Energy Efficiency for Masonry Infill Walls: A Shift of the Paradigm
title_short Interactions between Seismic Safety and Energy Efficiency for Masonry Infill Walls: A Shift of the Paradigm
title_sort interactions between seismic safety and energy efficiency for masonry infill walls a shift of the paradigm
topic masonry infill walls
structural safety
energy performance
costs
strengthening interventions
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/3269
work_keys_str_mv AT andrefurtado interactionsbetweenseismicsafetyandenergyefficiencyformasonryinfillwallsashiftoftheparadigm
AT hugorodrigues interactionsbetweenseismicsafetyandenergyefficiencyformasonryinfillwallsashiftoftheparadigm
AT antonioarede interactionsbetweenseismicsafetyandenergyefficiencyformasonryinfillwallsashiftoftheparadigm
AT fernandarodrigues interactionsbetweenseismicsafetyandenergyefficiencyformasonryinfillwallsashiftoftheparadigm
AT humbertovarum interactionsbetweenseismicsafetyandenergyefficiencyformasonryinfillwallsashiftoftheparadigm