Scheimpflug Corneal Densitometry Patterns at the Graft–Host Interface in DMEK and DSAEK: A 12-Month Longitudinal Comparative Study

Background: To compare corneal densitometry (CD) patterns at the graft–host interface between Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK). Corneal densitometry is a quantitative assessment that objectively evaluates corneal clar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antonio Ballesteros-Sánchez, Jorge Peraza-Nieves, Anna Casablanca-Piñera, Marina Rodríguez-Calvo-De-Mora, Saray Catalán-Coronado, Josep Torras-Sanvicens, Davide Borroni, José-María Sánchez-González, Carlos Rocha-De-Lossada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-11-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/22/7133
_version_ 1797458864254222336
author Antonio Ballesteros-Sánchez
Jorge Peraza-Nieves
Anna Casablanca-Piñera
Marina Rodríguez-Calvo-De-Mora
Saray Catalán-Coronado
Josep Torras-Sanvicens
Davide Borroni
José-María Sánchez-González
Carlos Rocha-De-Lossada
author_facet Antonio Ballesteros-Sánchez
Jorge Peraza-Nieves
Anna Casablanca-Piñera
Marina Rodríguez-Calvo-De-Mora
Saray Catalán-Coronado
Josep Torras-Sanvicens
Davide Borroni
José-María Sánchez-González
Carlos Rocha-De-Lossada
author_sort Antonio Ballesteros-Sánchez
collection DOAJ
description Background: To compare corneal densitometry (CD) patterns at the graft–host interface between Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK). Corneal densitometry is a quantitative assessment that objectively evaluates corneal clarity and optical quality by measuring the light backscatter from the cornea. Methods: Fifty-one eyes that received DMEK or DSAEK surgery for corneal endothelium dysfunction were evaluated. The primary endpoint included CD patterns at the graft–host interface, which were assessed by the Pentacam HR device at the center point of the corneal horizontal meridian (CD<sub>central</sub>), and at six points on the central circumference of the cornea (with a total diameter of 4 mm) (CD<sub>I,II,III,IV,V,VI</sub>). Secondary endpoints included the best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and graft thickness (GT). All of the evaluations were performed at follow-up appointments one, three, six and twelve months after the procedure. Results: DMEK showed a significant overall CD reduction of −7.9 ± 8.5 grayscale unit (GSU) compared to DSAEK (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In addition, the DMEK group showed significantly lower CD<sub>Central,I,II,III,IV,V,VI</sub> values at follow-up appointments one, three, six and twelve months after the procedure compared to the DSAEK group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). BCDVA, CCT and GT were in favor of the DMEK group with a mean value of 0.39 ± 0.35 LogMar, 552.2 ± 71.1 µm and 11.03 ± 1.4 µm, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Conclusions: CD patterns at the graft–host interface seem to be different depending on the endothelial keratoplasty procedure. This provides specific insight into CD changes in this critical region of surgery, which may provide a better understanding of the postoperative evolution of these patients.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T16:43:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ae5f908f0835405c99820f8c2e79e692
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T16:43:15Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-ae5f908f0835405c99820f8c2e79e6922023-11-24T14:49:35ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832023-11-011222713310.3390/jcm12227133Scheimpflug Corneal Densitometry Patterns at the Graft–Host Interface in DMEK and DSAEK: A 12-Month Longitudinal Comparative StudyAntonio Ballesteros-Sánchez0Jorge Peraza-Nieves1Anna Casablanca-Piñera2Marina Rodríguez-Calvo-De-Mora3Saray Catalán-Coronado4Josep Torras-Sanvicens5Davide Borroni6José-María Sánchez-González7Carlos Rocha-De-Lossada8Department of Physics of Condensed Matter, Optics Area, University of Seville, 41004 Seville, SpainAnterior Segment Department, Institut Clinic D’Oftalmologia, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, SpainAnterior Segment Department, Institut Clinic D’Oftalmologia, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, SpainQvision, Ophthalmology Department, VITHAS Almeria Hospital, 04120 Almeria, SpainAnterior Segment Department, Institut Clinic D’Oftalmologia, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, SpainAnterior Segment Department, Institut Clinic D’Oftalmologia, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, SpainDepartment of Doctoral Studies, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, LatviaDepartment of Physics of Condensed Matter, Optics Area, University of Seville, 41004 Seville, SpainQvision, Ophthalmology Department, VITHAS Almeria Hospital, 04120 Almeria, SpainBackground: To compare corneal densitometry (CD) patterns at the graft–host interface between Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK). Corneal densitometry is a quantitative assessment that objectively evaluates corneal clarity and optical quality by measuring the light backscatter from the cornea. Methods: Fifty-one eyes that received DMEK or DSAEK surgery for corneal endothelium dysfunction were evaluated. The primary endpoint included CD patterns at the graft–host interface, which were assessed by the Pentacam HR device at the center point of the corneal horizontal meridian (CD<sub>central</sub>), and at six points on the central circumference of the cornea (with a total diameter of 4 mm) (CD<sub>I,II,III,IV,V,VI</sub>). Secondary endpoints included the best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and graft thickness (GT). All of the evaluations were performed at follow-up appointments one, three, six and twelve months after the procedure. Results: DMEK showed a significant overall CD reduction of −7.9 ± 8.5 grayscale unit (GSU) compared to DSAEK (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In addition, the DMEK group showed significantly lower CD<sub>Central,I,II,III,IV,V,VI</sub> values at follow-up appointments one, three, six and twelve months after the procedure compared to the DSAEK group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). BCDVA, CCT and GT were in favor of the DMEK group with a mean value of 0.39 ± 0.35 LogMar, 552.2 ± 71.1 µm and 11.03 ± 1.4 µm, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Conclusions: CD patterns at the graft–host interface seem to be different depending on the endothelial keratoplasty procedure. This provides specific insight into CD changes in this critical region of surgery, which may provide a better understanding of the postoperative evolution of these patients.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/22/7133corneal densitometrygraft–host interfaceDescemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK)Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK)
spellingShingle Antonio Ballesteros-Sánchez
Jorge Peraza-Nieves
Anna Casablanca-Piñera
Marina Rodríguez-Calvo-De-Mora
Saray Catalán-Coronado
Josep Torras-Sanvicens
Davide Borroni
José-María Sánchez-González
Carlos Rocha-De-Lossada
Scheimpflug Corneal Densitometry Patterns at the Graft–Host Interface in DMEK and DSAEK: A 12-Month Longitudinal Comparative Study
Journal of Clinical Medicine
corneal densitometry
graft–host interface
Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK)
Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK)
title Scheimpflug Corneal Densitometry Patterns at the Graft–Host Interface in DMEK and DSAEK: A 12-Month Longitudinal Comparative Study
title_full Scheimpflug Corneal Densitometry Patterns at the Graft–Host Interface in DMEK and DSAEK: A 12-Month Longitudinal Comparative Study
title_fullStr Scheimpflug Corneal Densitometry Patterns at the Graft–Host Interface in DMEK and DSAEK: A 12-Month Longitudinal Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Scheimpflug Corneal Densitometry Patterns at the Graft–Host Interface in DMEK and DSAEK: A 12-Month Longitudinal Comparative Study
title_short Scheimpflug Corneal Densitometry Patterns at the Graft–Host Interface in DMEK and DSAEK: A 12-Month Longitudinal Comparative Study
title_sort scheimpflug corneal densitometry patterns at the graft host interface in dmek and dsaek a 12 month longitudinal comparative study
topic corneal densitometry
graft–host interface
Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK)
Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK)
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/22/7133
work_keys_str_mv AT antonioballesterossanchez scheimpflugcornealdensitometrypatternsatthegrafthostinterfaceindmekanddsaeka12monthlongitudinalcomparativestudy
AT jorgeperazanieves scheimpflugcornealdensitometrypatternsatthegrafthostinterfaceindmekanddsaeka12monthlongitudinalcomparativestudy
AT annacasablancapinera scheimpflugcornealdensitometrypatternsatthegrafthostinterfaceindmekanddsaeka12monthlongitudinalcomparativestudy
AT marinarodriguezcalvodemora scheimpflugcornealdensitometrypatternsatthegrafthostinterfaceindmekanddsaeka12monthlongitudinalcomparativestudy
AT saraycatalancoronado scheimpflugcornealdensitometrypatternsatthegrafthostinterfaceindmekanddsaeka12monthlongitudinalcomparativestudy
AT joseptorrassanvicens scheimpflugcornealdensitometrypatternsatthegrafthostinterfaceindmekanddsaeka12monthlongitudinalcomparativestudy
AT davideborroni scheimpflugcornealdensitometrypatternsatthegrafthostinterfaceindmekanddsaeka12monthlongitudinalcomparativestudy
AT josemariasanchezgonzalez scheimpflugcornealdensitometrypatternsatthegrafthostinterfaceindmekanddsaeka12monthlongitudinalcomparativestudy
AT carlosrochadelossada scheimpflugcornealdensitometrypatternsatthegrafthostinterfaceindmekanddsaeka12monthlongitudinalcomparativestudy