Green May Be Nice, but Infrastructure Is Necessary

Green infrastructure is presented as a novel and innovative approach in the current environmental planning discourse, but how new is it really? An historical overview of planning ideas in both the urban and the rural contexts indicates that the concept, if not the term, “green infrastructure” has a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elke Mertens, Richard Stiles, Nilgül Karadeniz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-01-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/1/89
_version_ 1797492779243274240
author Elke Mertens
Richard Stiles
Nilgül Karadeniz
author_facet Elke Mertens
Richard Stiles
Nilgül Karadeniz
author_sort Elke Mertens
collection DOAJ
description Green infrastructure is presented as a novel and innovative approach in the current environmental planning discourse, but how new is it really? An historical overview of planning ideas in both the urban and the rural contexts indicates that the concept, if not the term, “green infrastructure” has a very long and distinguished pedigree in the field of landscape and open space planning. To determine how far the concept is indeed new, definitions of green infrastructure from the literature are examined. While “green” has long been loosely used as a synonym for natural features and vegetation in the planning context, “infrastructure” is the part of the term which is really novel. Infrastructure is otherwise understood as being either “technical” or “social”, and the common features of these otherwise very different forms are considered in order to gain a better understanding of how they might also relate to a new interpretation of green infrastructure. A number of international case studies of different “green infrastructure” projects are then presented, again to better understand their common features and potential relationship to other infrastructure types. Finally, the necessity to consider green and blue areas together and to take them as seriously as other forms of infrastructure is emphasized. The developing climate and biodiversity crises underline the urgency of implementing a flexible and multifunctional green-blue infrastructure system. This must be carefully integrated into the existing fabric of both urban and rural landscapes and will require an appropriately resourced administration and management system, reflecting its beneficial impacts.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T01:08:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ae8041387cad4927b7d38ed7305a40f8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-445X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T01:08:38Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Land
spelling doaj.art-ae8041387cad4927b7d38ed7305a40f82023-11-23T14:22:27ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2022-01-011118910.3390/land11010089Green May Be Nice, but Infrastructure Is NecessaryElke Mertens0Richard Stiles1Nilgül Karadeniz2Department of Landscape Sciences and Geomatics, Faculty of Landscape Architecture, Neubrandenburg University of Applied Sciences, 17033 Neubrandenburg, GermanyDepartment of Landscape Architecture, Vienna University of Technology, 1040 Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Agriculture/Ankara University, Ankara 06120, TurkeyGreen infrastructure is presented as a novel and innovative approach in the current environmental planning discourse, but how new is it really? An historical overview of planning ideas in both the urban and the rural contexts indicates that the concept, if not the term, “green infrastructure” has a very long and distinguished pedigree in the field of landscape and open space planning. To determine how far the concept is indeed new, definitions of green infrastructure from the literature are examined. While “green” has long been loosely used as a synonym for natural features and vegetation in the planning context, “infrastructure” is the part of the term which is really novel. Infrastructure is otherwise understood as being either “technical” or “social”, and the common features of these otherwise very different forms are considered in order to gain a better understanding of how they might also relate to a new interpretation of green infrastructure. A number of international case studies of different “green infrastructure” projects are then presented, again to better understand their common features and potential relationship to other infrastructure types. Finally, the necessity to consider green and blue areas together and to take them as seriously as other forms of infrastructure is emphasized. The developing climate and biodiversity crises underline the urgency of implementing a flexible and multifunctional green-blue infrastructure system. This must be carefully integrated into the existing fabric of both urban and rural landscapes and will require an appropriately resourced administration and management system, reflecting its beneficial impacts.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/1/89green infrastructurelandscape and open space planningclimate changebiodiversity crisisgray and social infrastructuregreen corridor
spellingShingle Elke Mertens
Richard Stiles
Nilgül Karadeniz
Green May Be Nice, but Infrastructure Is Necessary
Land
green infrastructure
landscape and open space planning
climate change
biodiversity crisis
gray and social infrastructure
green corridor
title Green May Be Nice, but Infrastructure Is Necessary
title_full Green May Be Nice, but Infrastructure Is Necessary
title_fullStr Green May Be Nice, but Infrastructure Is Necessary
title_full_unstemmed Green May Be Nice, but Infrastructure Is Necessary
title_short Green May Be Nice, but Infrastructure Is Necessary
title_sort green may be nice but infrastructure is necessary
topic green infrastructure
landscape and open space planning
climate change
biodiversity crisis
gray and social infrastructure
green corridor
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/1/89
work_keys_str_mv AT elkemertens greenmaybenicebutinfrastructureisnecessary
AT richardstiles greenmaybenicebutinfrastructureisnecessary
AT nilgulkaradeniz greenmaybenicebutinfrastructureisnecessary