Cost-effectiveness of a pressure ulcer quality collaborative

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A quality improvement collaborative (QIC) in the Dutch long-term care sector (nursing homes, assisted living facilities, home care) used evidence-based prevention methods to reduce the incidence and prevalence of pressure ulcers (PUs...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bal Roland, Koopmanschap Marc, Makai Peter, Nieboer Anna P
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-06-01
Series:Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Online Access:http://www.resource-allocation.com/content/8/1/11
_version_ 1818641649900716032
author Bal Roland
Koopmanschap Marc
Makai Peter
Nieboer Anna P
author_facet Bal Roland
Koopmanschap Marc
Makai Peter
Nieboer Anna P
author_sort Bal Roland
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A quality improvement collaborative (QIC) in the Dutch long-term care sector (nursing homes, assisted living facilities, home care) used evidence-based prevention methods to reduce the incidence and prevalence of pressure ulcers (PUs). The collaborative consisted of a core team of experts and 25 organizational project teams. Our aim was to determine its cost-effectiveness from a healthcare perspective.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We used a non-controlled pre-post design to establish the change in incidence and prevalence of PUs in 88 patients over the course of a year. Staff indexed data and prevention methods (activities, materials). Quality of life (Qol) weights were assigned to the PU states. We assessed the costs of activities and materials in the project. A Markov model was built based on effectiveness and cost data, complemented with a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. To illustrate the results of longer term, three scenarios were created in which change in incidence and prevalence measures were (1) not sustained, (2) partially sustained, and (3) completely sustained.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Incidence of PUs decreased from 15% to 4.5% for the 88 patients. Prevalence decreased from 38.6% to 22.7%. Average Quality of Life (Qol) of patients increased by 0.02 Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY)s in two years; healthcare costs increased by €2000 per patient; the Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio (ICER) was between 78,500 and 131,000 depending on whether the changes in incidence and prevalence of PU were sustained.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>During the QIC PU incidence and prevalence significantly declined. When compared to standard PU care, the QIC was probably more costly and more effective in the short run, but its long-term cost-effectiveness is questionable. The QIC can only be cost-effective if the changes in incidence and prevalence of PU are sustained.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-16T23:30:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ae9df67b00474ff1a1502bab0937904e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1478-7547
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T23:30:32Z
publishDate 2010-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
spelling doaj.art-ae9df67b00474ff1a1502bab0937904e2022-12-21T22:11:53ZengBMCCost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation1478-75472010-06-01811110.1186/1478-7547-8-11Cost-effectiveness of a pressure ulcer quality collaborativeBal RolandKoopmanschap MarcMakai PeterNieboer Anna P<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A quality improvement collaborative (QIC) in the Dutch long-term care sector (nursing homes, assisted living facilities, home care) used evidence-based prevention methods to reduce the incidence and prevalence of pressure ulcers (PUs). The collaborative consisted of a core team of experts and 25 organizational project teams. Our aim was to determine its cost-effectiveness from a healthcare perspective.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We used a non-controlled pre-post design to establish the change in incidence and prevalence of PUs in 88 patients over the course of a year. Staff indexed data and prevention methods (activities, materials). Quality of life (Qol) weights were assigned to the PU states. We assessed the costs of activities and materials in the project. A Markov model was built based on effectiveness and cost data, complemented with a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. To illustrate the results of longer term, three scenarios were created in which change in incidence and prevalence measures were (1) not sustained, (2) partially sustained, and (3) completely sustained.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Incidence of PUs decreased from 15% to 4.5% for the 88 patients. Prevalence decreased from 38.6% to 22.7%. Average Quality of Life (Qol) of patients increased by 0.02 Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY)s in two years; healthcare costs increased by €2000 per patient; the Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio (ICER) was between 78,500 and 131,000 depending on whether the changes in incidence and prevalence of PU were sustained.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>During the QIC PU incidence and prevalence significantly declined. When compared to standard PU care, the QIC was probably more costly and more effective in the short run, but its long-term cost-effectiveness is questionable. The QIC can only be cost-effective if the changes in incidence and prevalence of PU are sustained.</p>http://www.resource-allocation.com/content/8/1/11
spellingShingle Bal Roland
Koopmanschap Marc
Makai Peter
Nieboer Anna P
Cost-effectiveness of a pressure ulcer quality collaborative
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
title Cost-effectiveness of a pressure ulcer quality collaborative
title_full Cost-effectiveness of a pressure ulcer quality collaborative
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of a pressure ulcer quality collaborative
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of a pressure ulcer quality collaborative
title_short Cost-effectiveness of a pressure ulcer quality collaborative
title_sort cost effectiveness of a pressure ulcer quality collaborative
url http://www.resource-allocation.com/content/8/1/11
work_keys_str_mv AT balroland costeffectivenessofapressureulcerqualitycollaborative
AT koopmanschapmarc costeffectivenessofapressureulcerqualitycollaborative
AT makaipeter costeffectivenessofapressureulcerqualitycollaborative
AT nieboerannap costeffectivenessofapressureulcerqualitycollaborative