Association of antimicrobial perioperative prophylaxis with cefuroxime plus metronidazole or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and surgical site infections in colorectal surgery

Abstract Objective To compare intravenous (IV) amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (A/CA) to IV cefuroxime plus metronidazole (C + M) for preventing surgical site infections (SSI) in colorectal surgery. Background Given their spectra that include most Enterobacterales and anaerobes, C + M is commonly recomm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elisavet Stavropoulou, Andrew Atkinson, Marie-Christine Eisenring, Christoph A. Fux, Jonas Marschall, Laurence Senn, Nicolas Troillet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-09-01
Series:Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01307-y
_version_ 1797556388179738624
author Elisavet Stavropoulou
Andrew Atkinson
Marie-Christine Eisenring
Christoph A. Fux
Jonas Marschall
Laurence Senn
Nicolas Troillet
author_facet Elisavet Stavropoulou
Andrew Atkinson
Marie-Christine Eisenring
Christoph A. Fux
Jonas Marschall
Laurence Senn
Nicolas Troillet
author_sort Elisavet Stavropoulou
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective To compare intravenous (IV) amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (A/CA) to IV cefuroxime plus metronidazole (C + M) for preventing surgical site infections (SSI) in colorectal surgery. Background Given their spectra that include most Enterobacterales and anaerobes, C + M is commonly recommended as prophylaxis of SSI in colorectal surgery. A/CA offers good coverage of Enterobacterales and anaerobes as well, but, in contrast to C + M, it also includes Enterococcus faecalis which is also isolated from patients with SSI and could trigger anastomotic leakage. Methods Data from a Swiss SSI surveillance program were used to compare SSI rates after class II (clean contaminated) colorectal surgery between patients who received C + M and those who received A/CA. We employed multivariable logistic regression to adjust for potential confounders, along with propensity score matching to adjust for group imbalance. Results From 2009 to 2018, 27,922 patients from 127 hospitals were included. SSI was diagnosed in 3132 (11.2%): 278/1835 (15.1%) in those who received A/CA and 2854/26,087 (10.9%) in those who received C + M (p < 0.001). The crude OR for SSI in the A/CA group as compared to C + M was 1.45 [CI 95% 1.21–1.75]. The adjusted OR was 1.49 [1.24–1.78]. This finding persisted in a 1:1 propensity score matched cohort of 1835 patients pairs with an OR of 1.60 [1.28–2.00]. Other factors independently associated with SSI were an ASA score > 2, a longer duration of operation, and a reoperation for a non-infectious complication. Protective factors were female sex, older age, antibiotic prophylaxis received 60 to 30 min before surgery, elective operation, and endoscopic approach. Conclusions Despite its activity against enterococci, A/CA was less effective than C + M for preventing SSI, suggesting that it should not be a first choice antibiotic prophylaxis for colorectal surgery.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T17:01:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ae9f37dc04bb46ca844363effb5ece77
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-2994
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T17:01:09Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
spelling doaj.art-ae9f37dc04bb46ca844363effb5ece772023-11-20T10:57:41ZengBMCAntimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control2047-29942023-09-011211710.1186/s13756-023-01307-yAssociation of antimicrobial perioperative prophylaxis with cefuroxime plus metronidazole or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and surgical site infections in colorectal surgeryElisavet Stavropoulou0Andrew Atkinson1Marie-Christine Eisenring2Christoph A. Fux3Jonas Marschall4Laurence Senn5Nicolas Troillet6Service of Infectious Diseases, Central Institute, Valais HospitalDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of BernService of Infectious Diseases, Central Institute, Valais HospitalDivision of Infectious Diseases and Infection Prevention, Kantonsspital AarauDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of BernSwissnoso, National Center for Infection PreventionService of Infectious Diseases, Central Institute, Valais HospitalAbstract Objective To compare intravenous (IV) amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (A/CA) to IV cefuroxime plus metronidazole (C + M) for preventing surgical site infections (SSI) in colorectal surgery. Background Given their spectra that include most Enterobacterales and anaerobes, C + M is commonly recommended as prophylaxis of SSI in colorectal surgery. A/CA offers good coverage of Enterobacterales and anaerobes as well, but, in contrast to C + M, it also includes Enterococcus faecalis which is also isolated from patients with SSI and could trigger anastomotic leakage. Methods Data from a Swiss SSI surveillance program were used to compare SSI rates after class II (clean contaminated) colorectal surgery between patients who received C + M and those who received A/CA. We employed multivariable logistic regression to adjust for potential confounders, along with propensity score matching to adjust for group imbalance. Results From 2009 to 2018, 27,922 patients from 127 hospitals were included. SSI was diagnosed in 3132 (11.2%): 278/1835 (15.1%) in those who received A/CA and 2854/26,087 (10.9%) in those who received C + M (p < 0.001). The crude OR for SSI in the A/CA group as compared to C + M was 1.45 [CI 95% 1.21–1.75]. The adjusted OR was 1.49 [1.24–1.78]. This finding persisted in a 1:1 propensity score matched cohort of 1835 patients pairs with an OR of 1.60 [1.28–2.00]. Other factors independently associated with SSI were an ASA score > 2, a longer duration of operation, and a reoperation for a non-infectious complication. Protective factors were female sex, older age, antibiotic prophylaxis received 60 to 30 min before surgery, elective operation, and endoscopic approach. Conclusions Despite its activity against enterococci, A/CA was less effective than C + M for preventing SSI, suggesting that it should not be a first choice antibiotic prophylaxis for colorectal surgery.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01307-ySurgical site infectionAntibiotic prophylaxisColorectal surgeryAmoxicillin/clavulanic acidCefuroximeMetronidazole
spellingShingle Elisavet Stavropoulou
Andrew Atkinson
Marie-Christine Eisenring
Christoph A. Fux
Jonas Marschall
Laurence Senn
Nicolas Troillet
Association of antimicrobial perioperative prophylaxis with cefuroxime plus metronidazole or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and surgical site infections in colorectal surgery
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Surgical site infection
Antibiotic prophylaxis
Colorectal surgery
Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid
Cefuroxime
Metronidazole
title Association of antimicrobial perioperative prophylaxis with cefuroxime plus metronidazole or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and surgical site infections in colorectal surgery
title_full Association of antimicrobial perioperative prophylaxis with cefuroxime plus metronidazole or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and surgical site infections in colorectal surgery
title_fullStr Association of antimicrobial perioperative prophylaxis with cefuroxime plus metronidazole or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and surgical site infections in colorectal surgery
title_full_unstemmed Association of antimicrobial perioperative prophylaxis with cefuroxime plus metronidazole or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and surgical site infections in colorectal surgery
title_short Association of antimicrobial perioperative prophylaxis with cefuroxime plus metronidazole or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and surgical site infections in colorectal surgery
title_sort association of antimicrobial perioperative prophylaxis with cefuroxime plus metronidazole or amoxicillin clavulanic acid and surgical site infections in colorectal surgery
topic Surgical site infection
Antibiotic prophylaxis
Colorectal surgery
Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid
Cefuroxime
Metronidazole
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01307-y
work_keys_str_mv AT elisavetstavropoulou associationofantimicrobialperioperativeprophylaxiswithcefuroximeplusmetronidazoleoramoxicillinclavulanicacidandsurgicalsiteinfectionsincolorectalsurgery
AT andrewatkinson associationofantimicrobialperioperativeprophylaxiswithcefuroximeplusmetronidazoleoramoxicillinclavulanicacidandsurgicalsiteinfectionsincolorectalsurgery
AT mariechristineeisenring associationofantimicrobialperioperativeprophylaxiswithcefuroximeplusmetronidazoleoramoxicillinclavulanicacidandsurgicalsiteinfectionsincolorectalsurgery
AT christophafux associationofantimicrobialperioperativeprophylaxiswithcefuroximeplusmetronidazoleoramoxicillinclavulanicacidandsurgicalsiteinfectionsincolorectalsurgery
AT jonasmarschall associationofantimicrobialperioperativeprophylaxiswithcefuroximeplusmetronidazoleoramoxicillinclavulanicacidandsurgicalsiteinfectionsincolorectalsurgery
AT laurencesenn associationofantimicrobialperioperativeprophylaxiswithcefuroximeplusmetronidazoleoramoxicillinclavulanicacidandsurgicalsiteinfectionsincolorectalsurgery
AT nicolastroillet associationofantimicrobialperioperativeprophylaxiswithcefuroximeplusmetronidazoleoramoxicillinclavulanicacidandsurgicalsiteinfectionsincolorectalsurgery