THE COMPARISON OF ARRHYTHMOGENICITY OF DIFFERENT SURGICAL APPROACHES TO ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY HEART DISEASE

Aim. To estimate the prevalence of iatrogenic atrial flutter in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) after two types of surgical operations: radiofrequency pulmonary veins isolation and radiofrequency modified mini Maze procedure; and to compare the results with co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. M. Chernyavsky, Yu. E. Kareva, I. A. Pak, S. S. Rakhmonov, A. B. Romanov, E. A. Pokushalov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: «SILICEA-POLIGRAF» LLC 2014-04-01
Series:Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cardiovascular.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/28
_version_ 1797882554602225664
author A. M. Chernyavsky
Yu. E. Kareva
I. A. Pak
S. S. Rakhmonov
A. B. Romanov
E. A. Pokushalov
author_facet A. M. Chernyavsky
Yu. E. Kareva
I. A. Pak
S. S. Rakhmonov
A. B. Romanov
E. A. Pokushalov
author_sort A. M. Chernyavsky
collection DOAJ
description Aim. To estimate the prevalence of iatrogenic atrial flutter in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) after two types of surgical operations: radiofrequency pulmonary veins isolation and radiofrequency modified mini Maze procedure; and to compare the results with control group of patients undergone aortic-coronary bypass grafting (CABG).Material and methods. Totally 95 patients included with CHD and persistent AF. Subjects were randomized into three groups: 1st (n=31) — with simultaneous CABG and radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary veins ostiums; 2nd (n=30) — simultaneous CABG and mini Maze procedure; 3rd control (n=34) — CABG only. For prolonged ECG monitoring the implanted devices Reveal XT were used in 53 subjects.Results. The patients escaped from left-atrial flutter were 90% in the 1st group. In the 2nd there was 1 case of left-atrial flutter (according to electrophysiological investigation — the leap through the mitral valve line), meaning 96,9% patients free from it. However there was no significant difference between 1st and 2nd groups (p=0,6). In the 3rd group postprocedure flutter developed in one case too, due to the scar on the left atrium wall after mitral valve regurgitation correction; so 97% patients escaped from flutter, but the difference was still not significant (p=0,4).Conclusion. In patients with CHD and AF it is recommended to perform radiofrequency modified mini Maze procedure combined with CABG due to its lower proarrhythmogenic effect. The rate of iatrogenic flutter is 3,1% after mini Maze and 10% after pulmonary veins ostiums isolation.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T03:36:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aea6fdb509cc429f852d3a1a5c7d8b27
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1728-8800
2619-0125
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-04-10T03:36:33Z
publishDate 2014-04-01
publisher «SILICEA-POLIGRAF» LLC
record_format Article
series Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика
spelling doaj.art-aea6fdb509cc429f852d3a1a5c7d8b272023-03-13T07:23:23Zrus«SILICEA-POLIGRAF» LLCКардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика1728-88002619-01252014-04-01132404510.15829/1728-8800-2014-2-40-4528THE COMPARISON OF ARRHYTHMOGENICITY OF DIFFERENT SURGICAL APPROACHES TO ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY HEART DISEASEA. M. Chernyavsky0Yu. E. Kareva1I. A. Pak2S. S. Rakhmonov3A. B. Romanov4E. A. Pokushalov5ФГБУ Новосибирский научно-исследовательский институт патологии кровообращения имени академика Е. Н. Мешалкина Минздрава России, НовосибирскФГБУ Новосибирский научно-исследовательский институт патологии кровообращения имени академика Е. Н. Мешалкина Минздрава России, НовосибирскФГБУ Новосибирский научно-исследовательский институт патологии кровообращения имени академика Е. Н. Мешалкина Минздрава России, НовосибирскФГБУ Новосибирский научно-исследовательский институт патологии кровообращения имени академика Е. Н. Мешалкина Минздрава России, НовосибирскФГБУ Новосибирский научно-исследовательский институт патологии кровообращения имени академика Е. Н. Мешалкина Минздрава России, НовосибирскФГБУ Новосибирский научно-исследовательский институт патологии кровообращения имени академика Е. Н. Мешалкина Минздрава России, НовосибирскAim. To estimate the prevalence of iatrogenic atrial flutter in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) after two types of surgical operations: radiofrequency pulmonary veins isolation and radiofrequency modified mini Maze procedure; and to compare the results with control group of patients undergone aortic-coronary bypass grafting (CABG).Material and methods. Totally 95 patients included with CHD and persistent AF. Subjects were randomized into three groups: 1st (n=31) — with simultaneous CABG and radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary veins ostiums; 2nd (n=30) — simultaneous CABG and mini Maze procedure; 3rd control (n=34) — CABG only. For prolonged ECG monitoring the implanted devices Reveal XT were used in 53 subjects.Results. The patients escaped from left-atrial flutter were 90% in the 1st group. In the 2nd there was 1 case of left-atrial flutter (according to electrophysiological investigation — the leap through the mitral valve line), meaning 96,9% patients free from it. However there was no significant difference between 1st and 2nd groups (p=0,6). In the 3rd group postprocedure flutter developed in one case too, due to the scar on the left atrium wall after mitral valve regurgitation correction; so 97% patients escaped from flutter, but the difference was still not significant (p=0,4).Conclusion. In patients with CHD and AF it is recommended to perform radiofrequency modified mini Maze procedure combined with CABG due to its lower proarrhythmogenic effect. The rate of iatrogenic flutter is 3,1% after mini Maze and 10% after pulmonary veins ostiums isolation.https://cardiovascular.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/28фибрилляция предсердийишемическая болезнь сердцаэпикардиальная радиочастотная аблация
spellingShingle A. M. Chernyavsky
Yu. E. Kareva
I. A. Pak
S. S. Rakhmonov
A. B. Romanov
E. A. Pokushalov
THE COMPARISON OF ARRHYTHMOGENICITY OF DIFFERENT SURGICAL APPROACHES TO ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY HEART DISEASE
Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика
фибрилляция предсердий
ишемическая болезнь сердца
эпикардиальная радиочастотная аблация
title THE COMPARISON OF ARRHYTHMOGENICITY OF DIFFERENT SURGICAL APPROACHES TO ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY HEART DISEASE
title_full THE COMPARISON OF ARRHYTHMOGENICITY OF DIFFERENT SURGICAL APPROACHES TO ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY HEART DISEASE
title_fullStr THE COMPARISON OF ARRHYTHMOGENICITY OF DIFFERENT SURGICAL APPROACHES TO ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY HEART DISEASE
title_full_unstemmed THE COMPARISON OF ARRHYTHMOGENICITY OF DIFFERENT SURGICAL APPROACHES TO ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY HEART DISEASE
title_short THE COMPARISON OF ARRHYTHMOGENICITY OF DIFFERENT SURGICAL APPROACHES TO ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY HEART DISEASE
title_sort comparison of arrhythmogenicity of different surgical approaches to atrial fibrillation in patients with coronary heart disease
topic фибрилляция предсердий
ишемическая болезнь сердца
эпикардиальная радиочастотная аблация
url https://cardiovascular.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/28
work_keys_str_mv AT amchernyavsky thecomparisonofarrhythmogenicityofdifferentsurgicalapproachestoatrialfibrillationinpatientswithcoronaryheartdisease
AT yuekareva thecomparisonofarrhythmogenicityofdifferentsurgicalapproachestoatrialfibrillationinpatientswithcoronaryheartdisease
AT iapak thecomparisonofarrhythmogenicityofdifferentsurgicalapproachestoatrialfibrillationinpatientswithcoronaryheartdisease
AT ssrakhmonov thecomparisonofarrhythmogenicityofdifferentsurgicalapproachestoatrialfibrillationinpatientswithcoronaryheartdisease
AT abromanov thecomparisonofarrhythmogenicityofdifferentsurgicalapproachestoatrialfibrillationinpatientswithcoronaryheartdisease
AT eapokushalov thecomparisonofarrhythmogenicityofdifferentsurgicalapproachestoatrialfibrillationinpatientswithcoronaryheartdisease
AT amchernyavsky comparisonofarrhythmogenicityofdifferentsurgicalapproachestoatrialfibrillationinpatientswithcoronaryheartdisease
AT yuekareva comparisonofarrhythmogenicityofdifferentsurgicalapproachestoatrialfibrillationinpatientswithcoronaryheartdisease
AT iapak comparisonofarrhythmogenicityofdifferentsurgicalapproachestoatrialfibrillationinpatientswithcoronaryheartdisease
AT ssrakhmonov comparisonofarrhythmogenicityofdifferentsurgicalapproachestoatrialfibrillationinpatientswithcoronaryheartdisease
AT abromanov comparisonofarrhythmogenicityofdifferentsurgicalapproachestoatrialfibrillationinpatientswithcoronaryheartdisease
AT eapokushalov comparisonofarrhythmogenicityofdifferentsurgicalapproachestoatrialfibrillationinpatientswithcoronaryheartdisease