Sex Differences in Modifiable Risk Factors and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease

Background It is still unknown whether traditional risk factors may have a sex‐specific impact on coronary artery disease (CAD) burden. Methods and Results We identified 14 793 patients who underwent coronary angiography for acute coronary syndromes in the ISACS‐TC (International Survey of Acute Cor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olivia Manfrini, Jinsung Yoon, Mihaela van der Schaar, Sasko Kedev, Marija Vavlukis, Goran Stankovic, Marialuisa Scarpone, Davor Miličić, Zorana Vasiljevic, Lina Badimon, Edina Cenko, Raffaele Bugiardini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-10-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.120.017235
_version_ 1819175108883775488
author Olivia Manfrini
Jinsung Yoon
Mihaela van der Schaar
Sasko Kedev
Marija Vavlukis
Goran Stankovic
Marialuisa Scarpone
Davor Miličić
Zorana Vasiljevic
Lina Badimon
Edina Cenko
Raffaele Bugiardini
author_facet Olivia Manfrini
Jinsung Yoon
Mihaela van der Schaar
Sasko Kedev
Marija Vavlukis
Goran Stankovic
Marialuisa Scarpone
Davor Miličić
Zorana Vasiljevic
Lina Badimon
Edina Cenko
Raffaele Bugiardini
author_sort Olivia Manfrini
collection DOAJ
description Background It is still unknown whether traditional risk factors may have a sex‐specific impact on coronary artery disease (CAD) burden. Methods and Results We identified 14 793 patients who underwent coronary angiography for acute coronary syndromes in the ISACS‐TC (International Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Transitional Countries; Clini​calTr​ials.gov, NCT01218776) registry from 2010 to 2019. The main outcome measure was the association between traditional risk factors and severity of CAD and its relationship with 30‐day mortality. Relative risk (RR) ratios and 95% CIs were calculated from the ratio of the absolute risks of women versus men using inverse probability of weighting. Estimates were compared by test of interaction on the log scale. Severity of CAD was categorized as obstructive (≥50% stenosis) versus nonobstructive CAD. The RR ratio for obstructive CAD in women versus men among people without diabetes mellitus was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.41–0.60) and among those with diabetes mellitus was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.62–1.29), with an interaction by diabetes mellitus status of P =0.002. Exposure to smoking shifted the RR ratios from 0.50 (95% CI, 0.41–0.61) in nonsmokers to 0.75 (95% CI, 0.54–1.03) in current smokers, with an interaction by smoking status of P=0.018. There were no significant sex‐related interactions with hypercholesterolemia and hypertension. Women with obstructive CAD had higher 30‐day mortality rates than men (RR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.48–2.07). No sex differences in mortality were observed in patients with nonobstructive CAD. Conclusions Obstructive CAD in women signifies a higher risk for mortality compared with men. Current smoking and diabetes mellitus disproportionally increase the risk of obstructive CAD in women. Achieving the goal of improving cardiovascular health in women still requires intensive efforts toward further implementation of lifestyle and treatment interventions. Registration URL: https://www.clini​caltr​ials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01218776.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T20:49:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aea784673c614796811dec83dbe220a6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T20:49:38Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-aea784673c614796811dec83dbe220a62022-12-21T18:13:08ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802020-10-0191910.1161/JAHA.120.017235Sex Differences in Modifiable Risk Factors and Severity of Coronary Artery DiseaseOlivia Manfrini0Jinsung Yoon1Mihaela van der Schaar2Sasko Kedev3Marija Vavlukis4Goran Stankovic5Marialuisa Scarpone6Davor Miličić7Zorana Vasiljevic8Lina Badimon9Edina Cenko10Raffaele Bugiardini11Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine University of Bologna Bologna ItalyDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of California Los Angeles CACambridge Centre for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics and Department of Population Health University of Cambridge Cambridge United KingdomUniversity Clinic of Cardiology Medical Faculty University "Ss. Cyril and Methodius" Skopje MacedoniaUniversity Clinic of Cardiology Medical Faculty University "Ss. Cyril and Methodius" Skopje MacedoniaClinic of Cardiology University Clinical Centre of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine University of Bologna Bologna ItalyDepartment for Cardiovascular Diseases University Hospital Center Zagreb University of Zagreb CroatiaMedical Faculty University of Belgrade SerbiaCardiovascular Research Program ICCC, IR‐IIBSant Pau, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, CiberCV‐Institute Carlos III Barcelona SpainDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine University of Bologna Bologna ItalyDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine University of Bologna Bologna ItalyBackground It is still unknown whether traditional risk factors may have a sex‐specific impact on coronary artery disease (CAD) burden. Methods and Results We identified 14 793 patients who underwent coronary angiography for acute coronary syndromes in the ISACS‐TC (International Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Transitional Countries; Clini​calTr​ials.gov, NCT01218776) registry from 2010 to 2019. The main outcome measure was the association between traditional risk factors and severity of CAD and its relationship with 30‐day mortality. Relative risk (RR) ratios and 95% CIs were calculated from the ratio of the absolute risks of women versus men using inverse probability of weighting. Estimates were compared by test of interaction on the log scale. Severity of CAD was categorized as obstructive (≥50% stenosis) versus nonobstructive CAD. The RR ratio for obstructive CAD in women versus men among people without diabetes mellitus was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.41–0.60) and among those with diabetes mellitus was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.62–1.29), with an interaction by diabetes mellitus status of P =0.002. Exposure to smoking shifted the RR ratios from 0.50 (95% CI, 0.41–0.61) in nonsmokers to 0.75 (95% CI, 0.54–1.03) in current smokers, with an interaction by smoking status of P=0.018. There were no significant sex‐related interactions with hypercholesterolemia and hypertension. Women with obstructive CAD had higher 30‐day mortality rates than men (RR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.48–2.07). No sex differences in mortality were observed in patients with nonobstructive CAD. Conclusions Obstructive CAD in women signifies a higher risk for mortality compared with men. Current smoking and diabetes mellitus disproportionally increase the risk of obstructive CAD in women. Achieving the goal of improving cardiovascular health in women still requires intensive efforts toward further implementation of lifestyle and treatment interventions. Registration URL: https://www.clini​caltr​ials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01218776.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.120.017235conventional risk factorsdiabetes mellitusobstructive coronary artery diseasesex differencessmoking
spellingShingle Olivia Manfrini
Jinsung Yoon
Mihaela van der Schaar
Sasko Kedev
Marija Vavlukis
Goran Stankovic
Marialuisa Scarpone
Davor Miličić
Zorana Vasiljevic
Lina Badimon
Edina Cenko
Raffaele Bugiardini
Sex Differences in Modifiable Risk Factors and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
conventional risk factors
diabetes mellitus
obstructive coronary artery disease
sex differences
smoking
title Sex Differences in Modifiable Risk Factors and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease
title_full Sex Differences in Modifiable Risk Factors and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease
title_fullStr Sex Differences in Modifiable Risk Factors and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease
title_full_unstemmed Sex Differences in Modifiable Risk Factors and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease
title_short Sex Differences in Modifiable Risk Factors and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease
title_sort sex differences in modifiable risk factors and severity of coronary artery disease
topic conventional risk factors
diabetes mellitus
obstructive coronary artery disease
sex differences
smoking
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.120.017235
work_keys_str_mv AT oliviamanfrini sexdifferencesinmodifiableriskfactorsandseverityofcoronaryarterydisease
AT jinsungyoon sexdifferencesinmodifiableriskfactorsandseverityofcoronaryarterydisease
AT mihaelavanderschaar sexdifferencesinmodifiableriskfactorsandseverityofcoronaryarterydisease
AT saskokedev sexdifferencesinmodifiableriskfactorsandseverityofcoronaryarterydisease
AT marijavavlukis sexdifferencesinmodifiableriskfactorsandseverityofcoronaryarterydisease
AT goranstankovic sexdifferencesinmodifiableriskfactorsandseverityofcoronaryarterydisease
AT marialuisascarpone sexdifferencesinmodifiableriskfactorsandseverityofcoronaryarterydisease
AT davormilicic sexdifferencesinmodifiableriskfactorsandseverityofcoronaryarterydisease
AT zoranavasiljevic sexdifferencesinmodifiableriskfactorsandseverityofcoronaryarterydisease
AT linabadimon sexdifferencesinmodifiableriskfactorsandseverityofcoronaryarterydisease
AT edinacenko sexdifferencesinmodifiableriskfactorsandseverityofcoronaryarterydisease
AT raffaelebugiardini sexdifferencesinmodifiableriskfactorsandseverityofcoronaryarterydisease