The evidentiary value of respondent's witnesses in civil and criminal cases
In Imami jurisprudence, the requirement of the rule of "testimony and oath" is that the obligation to present evidence is on the plaintiff and the respondent can provide the ground for issuing a ruling in his favor by swearing. This rule, along with some narrations, has caused the majority...
Main Authors: | Ruhollah Akrami, Azizollah Fahimi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Semnan University
2021-11-01
|
Series: | مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://feqh.semnan.ac.ir/article_5869_fe58fe7cd2c74c0873d80076bb6c9a0e.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Citing Testimony in Proceedings (its Terms, Validity, and Impact on Sentence of the Court)
by: Mysam Taram, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01) -
A Comparative Study of the Ways of Proving Anan in Islamic Jurisprudence, Iranian Law, and Iraqi Law
by: Mahdi Rahmani
Published: (2023-09-01) -
Perjury and wrongful witness testimony in criminal proceedings
by: Dragović Svjetlana P.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Some Features of the Criminal Procedural Status of a Witness
by: O. S. Morozova
Published: (2023-08-01) -
CURRENT PROBLEMS OF THE LEGAL STATUS OF A WITNESS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
by: KOZYREVA Irina Evgenievna
Published: (2023-12-01)