HEARTS in the Americas clinical pathway. Strengthening the decision support system to improve hypertension and cardiovascular disease risk management in primary care settings

BackgroundHEARTS in the Americas is the regional adaptation of the WHO Global HEARTS Initiative. It is implemented in 24 countries and over 2,000 primary healthcare facilities. This paper describes the results of a multicomponent, stepwise, quality improvement intervention designed by the HEARTS in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andres Rosende, Donald J. DiPette, Ramon Martinez, Jeffrey W. Brettler, Gonzalo Rodriguez, Eric Zuniga, Pedro Ordunez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1102482/full
_version_ 1797839067756363776
author Andres Rosende
Donald J. DiPette
Ramon Martinez
Jeffrey W. Brettler
Jeffrey W. Brettler
Gonzalo Rodriguez
Eric Zuniga
Pedro Ordunez
author_facet Andres Rosende
Donald J. DiPette
Ramon Martinez
Jeffrey W. Brettler
Jeffrey W. Brettler
Gonzalo Rodriguez
Eric Zuniga
Pedro Ordunez
author_sort Andres Rosende
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundHEARTS in the Americas is the regional adaptation of the WHO Global HEARTS Initiative. It is implemented in 24 countries and over 2,000 primary healthcare facilities. This paper describes the results of a multicomponent, stepwise, quality improvement intervention designed by the HEARTS in the Americas to support advances in hypertension treatment protocols and evolution towards the Clinical Pathway.MethodsThe quality improvement intervention comprised: 1) the use of the appraisal checklist to evaluate the current hypertension treatment protocols, 2) a peer-to-peer review and consensus process to resolve discrepancies, 3) a proposal of a clinical pathway to be considered by the countries, and 4) a process of review, adopt/adapt, consensus and approval of the clinical pathway by the national HEARTS protocol committee. A year later, 16 participants countries (10 and 6 from each cohort, respectively) were included in a second evaluation using the HEARTS appraisal checklist. We used the median and interquartile scores range and the percentages of the maximum possible total score for each domain as a performance measure to compare the results pre and post-intervention.ResultsAmong the eleven protocols from the ten countries in the first cohort, the baseline assessment achieved a median overall score of 22 points (ICR 18 −23.5; 65% yield). After the intervention, the overall score reached a median of 31.5 (ICR 28.5 −31.5; 93% yield). The second cohort of countries developed seven new clinical pathways with a median score of 31.5 (ICR 31.5 −32.5; 93% yield). The intervention was effective in three domains: 1. implementation (clinical follow-up intervals, frequency of drug refills, routine repeat blood pressure measurement when the first reading is off-target, and a straightforward course of action). 2. treatment (grouping all medications in a single daily intake and using a combination of two antihypertensive medications for all patients in the first treatment step upon the initial diagnosis of hypertension) and 3. management of cardiovascular risk (lower BP thresholds and targets based on CVD risk level, and the use of aspirin and statins in high-risk patients).ConclusionThis study confirms that this intervention was feasible, acceptable, and instrumental in achieving progress in all countries and all three domains of improvement: implementation, blood pressure treatment, and cardiovascular risk management. It also highlights the challenges that prevent a more rapid expansion of HEARTS in the Americas and confirms that the main barriers are in the organization of health services: drug titration by non-physician health workers, the lack of long-acting antihypertensive medications, lack of availability of fixed-doses combination in a single pill and cannot use high-intensity statins in patients with established cardiovascular diseases. Adopting and implementing the HEARTS Clinical Pathway can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of hypertension and cardiovascular disease risk management programs.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T15:51:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aeb792e33b174d048134d80e55369f87
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-055X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T15:51:05Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj.art-aeb792e33b174d048134d80e55369f872023-04-26T06:31:07ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2023-04-011010.3389/fcvm.2023.11024821102482HEARTS in the Americas clinical pathway. Strengthening the decision support system to improve hypertension and cardiovascular disease risk management in primary care settingsAndres Rosende0Donald J. DiPette1Ramon Martinez2Jeffrey W. Brettler3Jeffrey W. Brettler4Gonzalo Rodriguez5Eric Zuniga6Pedro Ordunez7Department of Non-Communicable Diseases and Mental Health, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, United StatesSchool of Medicine Columbia, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United StatesDepartment of Non-Communicable Diseases and Mental Health, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, United StatesDepartment of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, United StatesSouthern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesConsultant for HEARTS in the Americas, PAHO/WHO Office in Argentina, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaAntofagasta Health Service, University of Antofagasta, Antofagasta, ChileDepartment of Non-Communicable Diseases and Mental Health, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, United StatesBackgroundHEARTS in the Americas is the regional adaptation of the WHO Global HEARTS Initiative. It is implemented in 24 countries and over 2,000 primary healthcare facilities. This paper describes the results of a multicomponent, stepwise, quality improvement intervention designed by the HEARTS in the Americas to support advances in hypertension treatment protocols and evolution towards the Clinical Pathway.MethodsThe quality improvement intervention comprised: 1) the use of the appraisal checklist to evaluate the current hypertension treatment protocols, 2) a peer-to-peer review and consensus process to resolve discrepancies, 3) a proposal of a clinical pathway to be considered by the countries, and 4) a process of review, adopt/adapt, consensus and approval of the clinical pathway by the national HEARTS protocol committee. A year later, 16 participants countries (10 and 6 from each cohort, respectively) were included in a second evaluation using the HEARTS appraisal checklist. We used the median and interquartile scores range and the percentages of the maximum possible total score for each domain as a performance measure to compare the results pre and post-intervention.ResultsAmong the eleven protocols from the ten countries in the first cohort, the baseline assessment achieved a median overall score of 22 points (ICR 18 −23.5; 65% yield). After the intervention, the overall score reached a median of 31.5 (ICR 28.5 −31.5; 93% yield). The second cohort of countries developed seven new clinical pathways with a median score of 31.5 (ICR 31.5 −32.5; 93% yield). The intervention was effective in three domains: 1. implementation (clinical follow-up intervals, frequency of drug refills, routine repeat blood pressure measurement when the first reading is off-target, and a straightforward course of action). 2. treatment (grouping all medications in a single daily intake and using a combination of two antihypertensive medications for all patients in the first treatment step upon the initial diagnosis of hypertension) and 3. management of cardiovascular risk (lower BP thresholds and targets based on CVD risk level, and the use of aspirin and statins in high-risk patients).ConclusionThis study confirms that this intervention was feasible, acceptable, and instrumental in achieving progress in all countries and all three domains of improvement: implementation, blood pressure treatment, and cardiovascular risk management. It also highlights the challenges that prevent a more rapid expansion of HEARTS in the Americas and confirms that the main barriers are in the organization of health services: drug titration by non-physician health workers, the lack of long-acting antihypertensive medications, lack of availability of fixed-doses combination in a single pill and cannot use high-intensity statins in patients with established cardiovascular diseases. Adopting and implementing the HEARTS Clinical Pathway can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of hypertension and cardiovascular disease risk management programs.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1102482/fullcardiovascular diseaseshypertensionclinical protocolscritical pathwayspublic healthquality improvement
spellingShingle Andres Rosende
Donald J. DiPette
Ramon Martinez
Jeffrey W. Brettler
Jeffrey W. Brettler
Gonzalo Rodriguez
Eric Zuniga
Pedro Ordunez
HEARTS in the Americas clinical pathway. Strengthening the decision support system to improve hypertension and cardiovascular disease risk management in primary care settings
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
cardiovascular diseases
hypertension
clinical protocols
critical pathways
public health
quality improvement
title HEARTS in the Americas clinical pathway. Strengthening the decision support system to improve hypertension and cardiovascular disease risk management in primary care settings
title_full HEARTS in the Americas clinical pathway. Strengthening the decision support system to improve hypertension and cardiovascular disease risk management in primary care settings
title_fullStr HEARTS in the Americas clinical pathway. Strengthening the decision support system to improve hypertension and cardiovascular disease risk management in primary care settings
title_full_unstemmed HEARTS in the Americas clinical pathway. Strengthening the decision support system to improve hypertension and cardiovascular disease risk management in primary care settings
title_short HEARTS in the Americas clinical pathway. Strengthening the decision support system to improve hypertension and cardiovascular disease risk management in primary care settings
title_sort hearts in the americas clinical pathway strengthening the decision support system to improve hypertension and cardiovascular disease risk management in primary care settings
topic cardiovascular diseases
hypertension
clinical protocols
critical pathways
public health
quality improvement
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1102482/full
work_keys_str_mv AT andresrosende heartsintheamericasclinicalpathwaystrengtheningthedecisionsupportsystemtoimprovehypertensionandcardiovasculardiseaseriskmanagementinprimarycaresettings
AT donaldjdipette heartsintheamericasclinicalpathwaystrengtheningthedecisionsupportsystemtoimprovehypertensionandcardiovasculardiseaseriskmanagementinprimarycaresettings
AT ramonmartinez heartsintheamericasclinicalpathwaystrengtheningthedecisionsupportsystemtoimprovehypertensionandcardiovasculardiseaseriskmanagementinprimarycaresettings
AT jeffreywbrettler heartsintheamericasclinicalpathwaystrengtheningthedecisionsupportsystemtoimprovehypertensionandcardiovasculardiseaseriskmanagementinprimarycaresettings
AT jeffreywbrettler heartsintheamericasclinicalpathwaystrengtheningthedecisionsupportsystemtoimprovehypertensionandcardiovasculardiseaseriskmanagementinprimarycaresettings
AT gonzalorodriguez heartsintheamericasclinicalpathwaystrengtheningthedecisionsupportsystemtoimprovehypertensionandcardiovasculardiseaseriskmanagementinprimarycaresettings
AT ericzuniga heartsintheamericasclinicalpathwaystrengtheningthedecisionsupportsystemtoimprovehypertensionandcardiovasculardiseaseriskmanagementinprimarycaresettings
AT pedroordunez heartsintheamericasclinicalpathwaystrengtheningthedecisionsupportsystemtoimprovehypertensionandcardiovasculardiseaseriskmanagementinprimarycaresettings