Correction of vaccine effectiveness derived from test-negative case–control studies

Abstract Background Determining the vaccine effectiveness (VE) is an important part of studying every new vaccine. Test-negative case–control (TNCC) studies have recently been used to determine the VE. However, the estimated VE derived from a TNCC design depends on the test sensitivity and specifici...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Farrokh Habibzadeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-06-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01962-0
_version_ 1797806662944292864
author Farrokh Habibzadeh
author_facet Farrokh Habibzadeh
author_sort Farrokh Habibzadeh
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Determining the vaccine effectiveness (VE) is an important part of studying every new vaccine. Test-negative case–control (TNCC) studies have recently been used to determine the VE. However, the estimated VE derived from a TNCC design depends on the test sensitivity and specificity. Herein, a method for correction of the value of VE derived from a TNCC study is presented. Methods An analytical method is presented to compute the corrected VE based on the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic test utilized. To show the application of the method proposed, a hypothetical TNCC study is presented. In this in silico study, 100 000 individuals referring to a healthcare system for COVID-19-like illness were tested with diagnostic tests with sensitivities of 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0, and specificities ranging from 0.85 to 1.00. A vaccination coverage of 60%, an attack rate of 0.05 for COVID-19 in unvaccinated group, and a true VE of 0.70, were assumed. In this simulation, a COVID-19-like illness with an attack rate of 0.30 could also affect all the studied population regardless of their vaccination status. Results The observed VE ranged from 0.11 (computed for a test sensitivity of 0.60 and specificity of 0.85) to 0.71 (computed for a test sensitivity and specificity of 1.0). The mean computed corrected VE derived from the proposed method was 0.71 (the standard deviation of 0.02). Conclusions The observed VE derived from TNCC studies can be corrected easily. An acceptable estimate for VE can be computed regardless of the diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity used in the study.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T06:10:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aebe36b2ea23421ca8b24e50b4611966
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2288
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T06:10:42Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
spelling doaj.art-aebe36b2ea23421ca8b24e50b46119662023-06-11T11:17:30ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882023-06-012311610.1186/s12874-023-01962-0Correction of vaccine effectiveness derived from test-negative case–control studiesFarrokh Habibzadeh0Global Virus Network, Middle East RegionAbstract Background Determining the vaccine effectiveness (VE) is an important part of studying every new vaccine. Test-negative case–control (TNCC) studies have recently been used to determine the VE. However, the estimated VE derived from a TNCC design depends on the test sensitivity and specificity. Herein, a method for correction of the value of VE derived from a TNCC study is presented. Methods An analytical method is presented to compute the corrected VE based on the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic test utilized. To show the application of the method proposed, a hypothetical TNCC study is presented. In this in silico study, 100 000 individuals referring to a healthcare system for COVID-19-like illness were tested with diagnostic tests with sensitivities of 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0, and specificities ranging from 0.85 to 1.00. A vaccination coverage of 60%, an attack rate of 0.05 for COVID-19 in unvaccinated group, and a true VE of 0.70, were assumed. In this simulation, a COVID-19-like illness with an attack rate of 0.30 could also affect all the studied population regardless of their vaccination status. Results The observed VE ranged from 0.11 (computed for a test sensitivity of 0.60 and specificity of 0.85) to 0.71 (computed for a test sensitivity and specificity of 1.0). The mean computed corrected VE derived from the proposed method was 0.71 (the standard deviation of 0.02). Conclusions The observed VE derived from TNCC studies can be corrected easily. An acceptable estimate for VE can be computed regardless of the diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity used in the study.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01962-0VaccinesCase–control studiesDiagnostic testsSensitivity and specificitySARS-CoV-2
spellingShingle Farrokh Habibzadeh
Correction of vaccine effectiveness derived from test-negative case–control studies
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Vaccines
Case–control studies
Diagnostic tests
Sensitivity and specificity
SARS-CoV-2
title Correction of vaccine effectiveness derived from test-negative case–control studies
title_full Correction of vaccine effectiveness derived from test-negative case–control studies
title_fullStr Correction of vaccine effectiveness derived from test-negative case–control studies
title_full_unstemmed Correction of vaccine effectiveness derived from test-negative case–control studies
title_short Correction of vaccine effectiveness derived from test-negative case–control studies
title_sort correction of vaccine effectiveness derived from test negative case control studies
topic Vaccines
Case–control studies
Diagnostic tests
Sensitivity and specificity
SARS-CoV-2
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01962-0
work_keys_str_mv AT farrokhhabibzadeh correctionofvaccineeffectivenessderivedfromtestnegativecasecontrolstudies