COMPARISON OF NEONATAL APGAR SCORES AND PATIENT SATISFACTION LEVELS IN SPINAL VERSUS GENERAL ANESTHESIA IN ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTIONS

Objective: To compare patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal and general anesthesia in terms of neonatal APGAR scores and patient satisfaction. Study Design: Comparative cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Departments of Anesthesia and Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comb...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Syed Khurram Naseer, Aijaz Ali, Shizan Hamid Feroz, Dr Danish, Amir Sohail
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Army Medical College Rawalpindi 2021-08-01
Series:Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/3296
_version_ 1818824271876587520
author Syed Khurram Naseer
Aijaz Ali
Shizan Hamid Feroz
Dr Danish
Amir Sohail
author_facet Syed Khurram Naseer
Aijaz Ali
Shizan Hamid Feroz
Dr Danish
Amir Sohail
author_sort Syed Khurram Naseer
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To compare patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal and general anesthesia in terms of neonatal APGAR scores and patient satisfaction. Study Design: Comparative cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Departments of Anesthesia and Gynecology and Obstetrics, Combined Military Hospital Peshawar, for six months from Mar to Aug 2019. Methodology: In this study, 120 females with a singleton pregnancy of 36-40 weeks, and requiring a non-emergency elective cesarean section were enrolled through consecutive sampling in the study. The patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups of 60 women each through random table numbers. Group A received spinal anesthesia and group B general anesthesia. APGAR score was assessed at 5 minutes after delivery, and score of ≥7 was taken as satisfactory. Patient's satisfaction level regarding anesthesia was recorded on a visual analogue scale of 0 (extremely unsatisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied), and score of ≥7 was taken as satisfactory. Results: Women receiving general anesthesia were more satisfied as compared to receiving spinal anesthesia (95% vs. 78.3%; p-value 0.007). There was no significant difference in terms of APGAR scores in general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia (83.33% versus 90%; p-value 0.283). Conclusion: After an elective caesarean section, more mothers were satisfied after receiving general anesthesia as compared to spinal anesthesia. However, both types of anaesthesia were found to be equally safe for babies born in terms of APGAR scores at 5 minutes.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T23:53:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aec44083ea6a4da49ef6837f8c9a23f2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0030-9648
2411-8842
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T23:53:14Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Army Medical College Rawalpindi
record_format Article
series Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
spelling doaj.art-aec44083ea6a4da49ef6837f8c9a23f22022-12-21T20:46:50ZengArmy Medical College RawalpindiPakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal0030-96482411-88422021-08-0171411838710.51253/pafmj.v71i4.32963296COMPARISON OF NEONATAL APGAR SCORES AND PATIENT SATISFACTION LEVELS IN SPINAL VERSUS GENERAL ANESTHESIA IN ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTIONSSyed Khurram Naseer0Aijaz Ali1Shizan Hamid Feroz2Dr Danish3Amir SohailCombined Military Hospital Peshawar/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) PakistanCombined Military Hospital Badin/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) PakistanCombined Military Hospital Peshawar/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) PakistanCombined Military Hospital Peshawar/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) PakistanObjective: To compare patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal and general anesthesia in terms of neonatal APGAR scores and patient satisfaction. Study Design: Comparative cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Departments of Anesthesia and Gynecology and Obstetrics, Combined Military Hospital Peshawar, for six months from Mar to Aug 2019. Methodology: In this study, 120 females with a singleton pregnancy of 36-40 weeks, and requiring a non-emergency elective cesarean section were enrolled through consecutive sampling in the study. The patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups of 60 women each through random table numbers. Group A received spinal anesthesia and group B general anesthesia. APGAR score was assessed at 5 minutes after delivery, and score of ≥7 was taken as satisfactory. Patient's satisfaction level regarding anesthesia was recorded on a visual analogue scale of 0 (extremely unsatisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied), and score of ≥7 was taken as satisfactory. Results: Women receiving general anesthesia were more satisfied as compared to receiving spinal anesthesia (95% vs. 78.3%; p-value 0.007). There was no significant difference in terms of APGAR scores in general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia (83.33% versus 90%; p-value 0.283). Conclusion: After an elective caesarean section, more mothers were satisfied after receiving general anesthesia as compared to spinal anesthesia. However, both types of anaesthesia were found to be equally safe for babies born in terms of APGAR scores at 5 minutes.https://pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/3296apgar scorecesarean sectiongeneral anesthesiapatient satisfactionspinal anesthesiavisual analogue scale
spellingShingle Syed Khurram Naseer
Aijaz Ali
Shizan Hamid Feroz
Dr Danish
Amir Sohail
COMPARISON OF NEONATAL APGAR SCORES AND PATIENT SATISFACTION LEVELS IN SPINAL VERSUS GENERAL ANESTHESIA IN ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTIONS
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
apgar score
cesarean section
general anesthesia
patient satisfaction
spinal anesthesia
visual analogue scale
title COMPARISON OF NEONATAL APGAR SCORES AND PATIENT SATISFACTION LEVELS IN SPINAL VERSUS GENERAL ANESTHESIA IN ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTIONS
title_full COMPARISON OF NEONATAL APGAR SCORES AND PATIENT SATISFACTION LEVELS IN SPINAL VERSUS GENERAL ANESTHESIA IN ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTIONS
title_fullStr COMPARISON OF NEONATAL APGAR SCORES AND PATIENT SATISFACTION LEVELS IN SPINAL VERSUS GENERAL ANESTHESIA IN ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTIONS
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON OF NEONATAL APGAR SCORES AND PATIENT SATISFACTION LEVELS IN SPINAL VERSUS GENERAL ANESTHESIA IN ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTIONS
title_short COMPARISON OF NEONATAL APGAR SCORES AND PATIENT SATISFACTION LEVELS IN SPINAL VERSUS GENERAL ANESTHESIA IN ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTIONS
title_sort comparison of neonatal apgar scores and patient satisfaction levels in spinal versus general anesthesia in elective cesarean sections
topic apgar score
cesarean section
general anesthesia
patient satisfaction
spinal anesthesia
visual analogue scale
url https://pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/3296
work_keys_str_mv AT syedkhurramnaseer comparisonofneonatalapgarscoresandpatientsatisfactionlevelsinspinalversusgeneralanesthesiainelectivecesareansections
AT aijazali comparisonofneonatalapgarscoresandpatientsatisfactionlevelsinspinalversusgeneralanesthesiainelectivecesareansections
AT shizanhamidferoz comparisonofneonatalapgarscoresandpatientsatisfactionlevelsinspinalversusgeneralanesthesiainelectivecesareansections
AT drdanish comparisonofneonatalapgarscoresandpatientsatisfactionlevelsinspinalversusgeneralanesthesiainelectivecesareansections
AT amirsohail comparisonofneonatalapgarscoresandpatientsatisfactionlevelsinspinalversusgeneralanesthesiainelectivecesareansections