Empathic Neural Responses Predict Group Allegiance

Watching another person in pain activates brain areas involved in the sensation of our own pain. Importantly, this neural mirroring is not constant; rather, it is modulated by our beliefs about their intentions, circumstances, and group allegiances. We investigated if the neural empathic response is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Don A. Vaughn, Ricky R. Savjani, Mark S. Cohen, David M. Eagleman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00302/full
_version_ 1818035928470388736
author Don A. Vaughn
Don A. Vaughn
Ricky R. Savjani
Mark S. Cohen
David M. Eagleman
author_facet Don A. Vaughn
Don A. Vaughn
Ricky R. Savjani
Mark S. Cohen
David M. Eagleman
author_sort Don A. Vaughn
collection DOAJ
description Watching another person in pain activates brain areas involved in the sensation of our own pain. Importantly, this neural mirroring is not constant; rather, it is modulated by our beliefs about their intentions, circumstances, and group allegiances. We investigated if the neural empathic response is modulated by minimally-differentiating information (e.g., a simple text label indicating another's religious belief), and if neural activity changes predict ingroups and outgroups across independent paradigms. We found that the empathic response was larger when participants viewed a painful event occurring to a hand labeled with their own religion (ingroup) than to a hand labeled with a different religion (outgroup). Counterintuitively, the magnitude of this bias correlated positively with the magnitude of participants' self-reported empathy. A multivariate classifier, using mean activity in empathy-related brain regions as features, discriminated ingroup from outgroup with 72% accuracy; the classifier's confidence correlated with belief certainty. This classifier generalized successfully to validation experiments in which the ingroup condition was based on an arbitrary group assignment. Empathy networks thus allow for the classification of long-held, newly-modified and arbitrarily-formed ingroups and outgroups. This is the first report of a single machine learning model on neural activation that generalizes to multiple representations of ingroup and outgroup. The current findings may prove useful as an objective diagnostic tool to measure the magnitude of one's group affiliations, and the effectiveness of interventions to reduce ingroup biases.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T07:02:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aee203f165d5409f94afd920847190de
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5161
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T07:02:51Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-aee203f165d5409f94afd920847190de2022-12-22T01:58:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612018-07-011210.3389/fnhum.2018.00302372403Empathic Neural Responses Predict Group AllegianceDon A. Vaughn0Don A. Vaughn1Ricky R. Savjani2Mark S. Cohen3David M. Eagleman4Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United StatesTexas A&M University, College Station, TX, United StatesSemel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United StatesWatching another person in pain activates brain areas involved in the sensation of our own pain. Importantly, this neural mirroring is not constant; rather, it is modulated by our beliefs about their intentions, circumstances, and group allegiances. We investigated if the neural empathic response is modulated by minimally-differentiating information (e.g., a simple text label indicating another's religious belief), and if neural activity changes predict ingroups and outgroups across independent paradigms. We found that the empathic response was larger when participants viewed a painful event occurring to a hand labeled with their own religion (ingroup) than to a hand labeled with a different religion (outgroup). Counterintuitively, the magnitude of this bias correlated positively with the magnitude of participants' self-reported empathy. A multivariate classifier, using mean activity in empathy-related brain regions as features, discriminated ingroup from outgroup with 72% accuracy; the classifier's confidence correlated with belief certainty. This classifier generalized successfully to validation experiments in which the ingroup condition was based on an arbitrary group assignment. Empathy networks thus allow for the classification of long-held, newly-modified and arbitrarily-formed ingroups and outgroups. This is the first report of a single machine learning model on neural activation that generalizes to multiple representations of ingroup and outgroup. The current findings may prove useful as an objective diagnostic tool to measure the magnitude of one's group affiliations, and the effectiveness of interventions to reduce ingroup biases.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00302/fullempathypainingroupmachine learningreligionsocial neuroscience
spellingShingle Don A. Vaughn
Don A. Vaughn
Ricky R. Savjani
Mark S. Cohen
David M. Eagleman
Empathic Neural Responses Predict Group Allegiance
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
empathy
pain
ingroup
machine learning
religion
social neuroscience
title Empathic Neural Responses Predict Group Allegiance
title_full Empathic Neural Responses Predict Group Allegiance
title_fullStr Empathic Neural Responses Predict Group Allegiance
title_full_unstemmed Empathic Neural Responses Predict Group Allegiance
title_short Empathic Neural Responses Predict Group Allegiance
title_sort empathic neural responses predict group allegiance
topic empathy
pain
ingroup
machine learning
religion
social neuroscience
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00302/full
work_keys_str_mv AT donavaughn empathicneuralresponsespredictgroupallegiance
AT donavaughn empathicneuralresponsespredictgroupallegiance
AT rickyrsavjani empathicneuralresponsespredictgroupallegiance
AT markscohen empathicneuralresponsespredictgroupallegiance
AT davidmeagleman empathicneuralresponsespredictgroupallegiance