Anarâškielâ postpositioi pelni já piälán čäällim sierâ já oohtân tievâdâsâinis SIKOR-tekstâčuágálduvâst

Inari Saami does not have a strong written tradition. The current orthography was adopted as recently as the 1990s, and the revitalization process is beginning only now to shift its focus from increasing the number of speakers to strengthening the literacy of the language. This article studies the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Petter Morottaja, Marja-Liisa Olthuis, Fabrizio Brecciaroli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Septentrio Academic Publishing 2022-08-01
Series:Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers on Language & Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlyd/article/view/6384
_version_ 1818040240666836992
author Petter Morottaja
Marja-Liisa Olthuis
Fabrizio Brecciaroli
author_facet Petter Morottaja
Marja-Liisa Olthuis
Fabrizio Brecciaroli
author_sort Petter Morottaja
collection DOAJ
description Inari Saami does not have a strong written tradition. The current orthography was adopted as recently as the 1990s, and the revitalization process is beginning only now to shift its focus from increasing the number of speakers to strengthening the literacy of the language. This article studies the Inari Saami postpositions pelni and piälán as well as their shorter forms peln/beln and pel/bel. The main question is whether these postpositions are joined to the noun preceding them or stand after it as separate words. The research is based on the SIKOR Inari Saami free corpus developed by the Giellatekno team. The postpositions have been analyzed semantically taking into account the frequency with which they occur in the literature. They have been divided into four semantic groups: 1) place, 2) orientation and direction, 3) time and 4) other semantic categories. The long forms pelni and piälán are mostly written as separate words – except for when they are used to express orientation or direction – whereas the short forms peln/beln and pel/bel are usually joined to the preceding word other than in time expressions. Alternative explanations for such variation are also discussed.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T08:11:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aeede970060d4d6687364816cc24c509
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1503-8599
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T08:11:23Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Septentrio Academic Publishing
record_format Article
series Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers on Language & Linguistics
spelling doaj.art-aeede970060d4d6687364816cc24c5092022-12-22T01:56:34ZengSeptentrio Academic PublishingNordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers on Language & Linguistics1503-85992022-08-0146110.7557/12.6384Anarâškielâ postpositioi pelni já piälán čäällim sierâ já oohtân tievâdâsâinis SIKOR-tekstâčuágálduvâstPetter Morottaja0Marja-Liisa Olthuis1Fabrizio Brecciaroli2University of OuluUniversity of OuluAnarâškielâ servi ry Inari Saami does not have a strong written tradition. The current orthography was adopted as recently as the 1990s, and the revitalization process is beginning only now to shift its focus from increasing the number of speakers to strengthening the literacy of the language. This article studies the Inari Saami postpositions pelni and piälán as well as their shorter forms peln/beln and pel/bel. The main question is whether these postpositions are joined to the noun preceding them or stand after it as separate words. The research is based on the SIKOR Inari Saami free corpus developed by the Giellatekno team. The postpositions have been analyzed semantically taking into account the frequency with which they occur in the literature. They have been divided into four semantic groups: 1) place, 2) orientation and direction, 3) time and 4) other semantic categories. The long forms pelni and piälán are mostly written as separate words – except for when they are used to express orientation or direction – whereas the short forms peln/beln and pel/bel are usually joined to the preceding word other than in time expressions. Alternative explanations for such variation are also discussed. https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlyd/article/view/6384postpositionorthographyGiellateknolanguage revitalisationlanguage variation
spellingShingle Petter Morottaja
Marja-Liisa Olthuis
Fabrizio Brecciaroli
Anarâškielâ postpositioi pelni já piälán čäällim sierâ já oohtân tievâdâsâinis SIKOR-tekstâčuágálduvâst
Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers on Language & Linguistics
postposition
orthography
Giellatekno
language revitalisation
language variation
title Anarâškielâ postpositioi pelni já piälán čäällim sierâ já oohtân tievâdâsâinis SIKOR-tekstâčuágálduvâst
title_full Anarâškielâ postpositioi pelni já piälán čäällim sierâ já oohtân tievâdâsâinis SIKOR-tekstâčuágálduvâst
title_fullStr Anarâškielâ postpositioi pelni já piälán čäällim sierâ já oohtân tievâdâsâinis SIKOR-tekstâčuágálduvâst
title_full_unstemmed Anarâškielâ postpositioi pelni já piälán čäällim sierâ já oohtân tievâdâsâinis SIKOR-tekstâčuágálduvâst
title_short Anarâškielâ postpositioi pelni já piälán čäällim sierâ já oohtân tievâdâsâinis SIKOR-tekstâčuágálduvâst
title_sort anaraskiela postpositioi pelni ja pialan caallim siera ja oohtan tievadasainis sikor tekstacuagalduvast
topic postposition
orthography
Giellatekno
language revitalisation
language variation
url https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlyd/article/view/6384
work_keys_str_mv AT pettermorottaja anaraskielapostpositioipelnijapialancaallimsierajaoohtantievadasainissikortekstacuagalduvast
AT marjaliisaolthuis anaraskielapostpositioipelnijapialancaallimsierajaoohtantievadasainissikortekstacuagalduvast
AT fabriziobrecciaroli anaraskielapostpositioipelnijapialancaallimsierajaoohtantievadasainissikortekstacuagalduvast