Eroding students’ rural motivation: first do no harm?

Migration of health professionals is one of the drivers of vast inequalities in access to healthcare, as medical graduates tend to move away from both poorer countries and rural areas. One of the central ethical problems raised in attempting to alleviate these inequalities is the tension betwe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Samia Hurst
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW) 2014-11-01
Series:Swiss Medical Weekly
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/1938
_version_ 1811194101677162496
author Samia Hurst
author_facet Samia Hurst
author_sort Samia Hurst
collection DOAJ
description Migration of health professionals is one of the drivers of vast inequalities in access to healthcare, as medical graduates tend to move away from both poorer countries and rural areas. One of the central ethical problems raised in attempting to alleviate these inequalities is the tension between the healthcare needs of under-served patients and the rights of medical graduates to choose their place of work and specialty. If medical graduates had greater motivation to work in under-served rural areas, this tension would decrease accordingly. Medical schools have a duty to avoid eroding existing motivation for such training and practice. This duty has practical implications. Medical students’ motivation regarding their choice of specialty changes during medical training, turning them away from choices such as primary care and rural practice towards more highly specialised, more hospital based specialties. Although students may be victims of a number of biases in the initial assessment, this is unlikely to be the whole story. Students’ priorities are likely to change based on their admiration for specialist role models and the visibility of the financial and non-financial rewards attached to these specialties. Students may also have a false expectation upon admission that they will be proficient in rural medicine on graduation, and change their mind once they realise the limits of their skills in that area. Although the measures required to reverse this effect currently lack a solid evidence base, they are plausible and supported by the available data.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T00:21:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-af10a64c862547749c51d5dd845ef1b4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-3997
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T00:21:35Z
publishDate 2014-11-01
publisher SMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW)
record_format Article
series Swiss Medical Weekly
spelling doaj.art-af10a64c862547749c51d5dd845ef1b42022-12-22T03:55:43ZengSMW supporting association (Trägerverein Swiss Medical Weekly SMW)Swiss Medical Weekly1424-39972014-11-01144454610.4414/smw.2014.14020Eroding students’ rural motivation: first do no harm?Samia Hurst Migration of health professionals is one of the drivers of vast inequalities in access to healthcare, as medical graduates tend to move away from both poorer countries and rural areas. One of the central ethical problems raised in attempting to alleviate these inequalities is the tension between the healthcare needs of under-served patients and the rights of medical graduates to choose their place of work and specialty. If medical graduates had greater motivation to work in under-served rural areas, this tension would decrease accordingly. Medical schools have a duty to avoid eroding existing motivation for such training and practice. This duty has practical implications. Medical students’ motivation regarding their choice of specialty changes during medical training, turning them away from choices such as primary care and rural practice towards more highly specialised, more hospital based specialties. Although students may be victims of a number of biases in the initial assessment, this is unlikely to be the whole story. Students’ priorities are likely to change based on their admiration for specialist role models and the visibility of the financial and non-financial rewards attached to these specialties. Students may also have a false expectation upon admission that they will be proficient in rural medicine on graduation, and change their mind once they realise the limits of their skills in that area. Although the measures required to reverse this effect currently lack a solid evidence base, they are plausible and supported by the available data. https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/1938Switzerlandmedical educationethicsprimary careMedical migrationrural practice
spellingShingle Samia Hurst
Eroding students’ rural motivation: first do no harm?
Swiss Medical Weekly
Switzerland
medical education
ethics
primary care
Medical migration
rural practice
title Eroding students’ rural motivation: first do no harm?
title_full Eroding students’ rural motivation: first do no harm?
title_fullStr Eroding students’ rural motivation: first do no harm?
title_full_unstemmed Eroding students’ rural motivation: first do no harm?
title_short Eroding students’ rural motivation: first do no harm?
title_sort eroding students rural motivation first do no harm
topic Switzerland
medical education
ethics
primary care
Medical migration
rural practice
url https://www.smw.ch/index.php/smw/article/view/1938
work_keys_str_mv AT samiahurst erodingstudentsruralmotivationfirstdonoharm