Authorship Diversity in General Surgery Related Cochrane Systematic Reviews
Background This study sought to determine the gender and country diversity in authorship representation in the authorship of Cochrane systematic reviews related to General Surgery. Methods We searched and extracted data from the Cochrane Library on 3 September 2022 using ‘keyword:Gene...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
2022-12-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Medical Students |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ijms.info/IJMS/article/view/1728 |
| _version_ | 1797759544288346112 |
|---|---|
| author | Arkadeep Dhali Vincent Kipkorir Christopher D'Souza Roger B Rathna Jyotirmoy Biswas |
| author_facet | Arkadeep Dhali Vincent Kipkorir Christopher D'Souza Roger B Rathna Jyotirmoy Biswas |
| author_sort | Arkadeep Dhali |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Background
This study sought to determine the gender and country diversity in authorship representation in the authorship of Cochrane systematic reviews related to General Surgery.
Methods
We searched and extracted data from the Cochrane Library on 3 September 2022 using ‘keyword:General surgery’, and included published reviews, protocols, and withdrawn publications. We extracted authors’ details and searched online to determine their gender, attempting to capture at least one webpage demonstrating it. Authors whose gender could not be ascertained were excluded from gender-based analyses. For graphical representation, we used a choropleth-style map. We treated a collaborative author group belonging to a single country, e.g., MRC Clinical Trials Unit (UK), as a single author. A second author independently cross-verified the extracted data.
Result
Two hundred and fifty publications with a total of 1420 authors were included in the current study. Four authors had affiliation to two countries. The leading five represented nations (Figure 1A) in authorship were United Kingdom (n=562, 39.4%), China (n=163, 11.5%), Italy (n=144, 10.1%), Canada (n=91, 6.4%), and United States of America (n=89, 6.2%).
Syria is the only country among all the low-income countries which had authorship representation and constituted 0.34% (n=5) of all the authors. India (n=8, 0.6%) and Nigeria (n=2, 0.1%) were the only countries from lower-middle income groups who had representation.
Male (n=957) to female (n=453) ratio in this study was 2.11:1 (Figure 1B). Sex data for ten authors couldn’t be retreived and were categorized as ‘unknown’ group. There were 169 (67.3%) male and 82 (32.6%) female first authors (sex ratio 2.06:1). One study had designated two authors as co-first authors. Women (n= 81) constituted 32.4% of all the corresponding authors (sex ratio 2.06:1). One article didn’t have any designated corresponding author. One hundred and fifty (60%) studies didn’t have any female representation in any lead author (corresponding or first author) position. Fifty-eight (23.2%) studies didn’t have any female authors at all, whereas in contrast there were only eight studies (3.2%) which did not have any male authors.
Conclusion
Authors from high-income countries continue to be the largest contributors to Cochrane systematic reviews in General Surgery, source of one of the highest quality evidence. There is extremely poor representation of female authors and authors from low and low-middle-income countries. Active capacity-building efforts are needed in several countries for advancing authorship diversity.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T18:45:56Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-af307c24e62f409b8f6f31cd265c67de |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2076-6327 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T18:45:56Z |
| publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
| publisher | University Library System, University of Pittsburgh |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Medical Students |
| spelling | doaj.art-af307c24e62f409b8f6f31cd265c67de2023-08-02T07:39:53ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghInternational Journal of Medical Students2076-63272022-12-011010.5195/ijms.2022.1728Authorship Diversity in General Surgery Related Cochrane Systematic ReviewsArkadeep Dhali0Vincent KipkorirChristopher D'SouzaRoger B RathnaJyotirmoy BiswasDepartment of GI Surgery, IPGME&R, School of Digestive & Liver Diseases, Kolkata, India Background This study sought to determine the gender and country diversity in authorship representation in the authorship of Cochrane systematic reviews related to General Surgery. Methods We searched and extracted data from the Cochrane Library on 3 September 2022 using ‘keyword:General surgery’, and included published reviews, protocols, and withdrawn publications. We extracted authors’ details and searched online to determine their gender, attempting to capture at least one webpage demonstrating it. Authors whose gender could not be ascertained were excluded from gender-based analyses. For graphical representation, we used a choropleth-style map. We treated a collaborative author group belonging to a single country, e.g., MRC Clinical Trials Unit (UK), as a single author. A second author independently cross-verified the extracted data. Result Two hundred and fifty publications with a total of 1420 authors were included in the current study. Four authors had affiliation to two countries. The leading five represented nations (Figure 1A) in authorship were United Kingdom (n=562, 39.4%), China (n=163, 11.5%), Italy (n=144, 10.1%), Canada (n=91, 6.4%), and United States of America (n=89, 6.2%). Syria is the only country among all the low-income countries which had authorship representation and constituted 0.34% (n=5) of all the authors. India (n=8, 0.6%) and Nigeria (n=2, 0.1%) were the only countries from lower-middle income groups who had representation. Male (n=957) to female (n=453) ratio in this study was 2.11:1 (Figure 1B). Sex data for ten authors couldn’t be retreived and were categorized as ‘unknown’ group. There were 169 (67.3%) male and 82 (32.6%) female first authors (sex ratio 2.06:1). One study had designated two authors as co-first authors. Women (n= 81) constituted 32.4% of all the corresponding authors (sex ratio 2.06:1). One article didn’t have any designated corresponding author. One hundred and fifty (60%) studies didn’t have any female representation in any lead author (corresponding or first author) position. Fifty-eight (23.2%) studies didn’t have any female authors at all, whereas in contrast there were only eight studies (3.2%) which did not have any male authors. Conclusion Authors from high-income countries continue to be the largest contributors to Cochrane systematic reviews in General Surgery, source of one of the highest quality evidence. There is extremely poor representation of female authors and authors from low and low-middle-income countries. Active capacity-building efforts are needed in several countries for advancing authorship diversity. https://ijms.info/IJMS/article/view/1728DiversityAuthorshipGender BiasAcademiaGeneral Surgery |
| spellingShingle | Arkadeep Dhali Vincent Kipkorir Christopher D'Souza Roger B Rathna Jyotirmoy Biswas Authorship Diversity in General Surgery Related Cochrane Systematic Reviews International Journal of Medical Students Diversity Authorship Gender Bias Academia General Surgery |
| title | Authorship Diversity in General Surgery Related Cochrane Systematic Reviews |
| title_full | Authorship Diversity in General Surgery Related Cochrane Systematic Reviews |
| title_fullStr | Authorship Diversity in General Surgery Related Cochrane Systematic Reviews |
| title_full_unstemmed | Authorship Diversity in General Surgery Related Cochrane Systematic Reviews |
| title_short | Authorship Diversity in General Surgery Related Cochrane Systematic Reviews |
| title_sort | authorship diversity in general surgery related cochrane systematic reviews |
| topic | Diversity Authorship Gender Bias Academia General Surgery |
| url | https://ijms.info/IJMS/article/view/1728 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT arkadeepdhali authorshipdiversityingeneralsurgeryrelatedcochranesystematicreviews AT vincentkipkorir authorshipdiversityingeneralsurgeryrelatedcochranesystematicreviews AT christopherdsouza authorshipdiversityingeneralsurgeryrelatedcochranesystematicreviews AT rogerbrathna authorshipdiversityingeneralsurgeryrelatedcochranesystematicreviews AT jyotirmoybiswas authorshipdiversityingeneralsurgeryrelatedcochranesystematicreviews |