Narrative analysis of the term of "weapon" in the substantiation of the crime of moharebeh (A Critique of Article 279 of the Islamic Penal Code)

In the Islamic Penal Code adopted in 2013, the legislator of the Islamic Republic of Iran considered the definition of the crime of the crime of moharebeh (waging war against God or people) to be conditional on being armed, while, on one hand, the definition of a vast number of jurists does not rega...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bahman Sabzaligol, Mohammad Rasool Ahangaran, Mahmood Ghayomzadeh
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Semnan University 2021-02-01
Series:مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://feqh.semnan.ac.ir/article_4889_a22867b30371fa3393bd14a064743dd0.pdf
_version_ 1797296424316043264
author Bahman Sabzaligol
Mohammad Rasool Ahangaran
Mahmood Ghayomzadeh
author_facet Bahman Sabzaligol
Mohammad Rasool Ahangaran
Mahmood Ghayomzadeh
author_sort Bahman Sabzaligol
collection DOAJ
description In the Islamic Penal Code adopted in 2013, the legislator of the Islamic Republic of Iran considered the definition of the crime of the crime of moharebeh (waging war against God or people) to be conditional on being armed, while, on one hand, the definition of a vast number of jurists does not regard this condition and in the known definition, according to some Jurisprudence and useful evidences, are the dominant assurance and not the avoiding, and on the other, it is implied from jurisprudential documents that if the battle is realized, the mentioned condition is not expressed and in case of non-occurrence of the battle and in case of only deprivation of public security, mentioning this condition does not mean that it constitutes a part of the subject, but it means the expression of the predominant condition. The present study is conducted through a descriptive-analytical method by means of library data and is written aiming at criticizing the law for interfering the condition of being armed in the crime of battle and at the same time its thoroughness in terms of this condition.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T22:03:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-af30fa01e2924115b7377f03e558fa17
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2008-7012
2717-0330
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-07T22:03:30Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher Semnan University
record_format Article
series مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی
spelling doaj.art-af30fa01e2924115b7377f03e558fa172024-02-23T23:20:05ZfasSemnan Universityمطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی2008-70122717-03302021-02-01122312314810.22075/feqh.2020.20868.25054889Narrative analysis of the term of "weapon" in the substantiation of the crime of moharebeh (A Critique of Article 279 of the Islamic Penal Code)Bahman Sabzaligol0Mohammad Rasool Ahangaran1Mahmood Ghayomzadeh2Azad Islamic University-SavehTehran University-FarabiAzad Islamic University-SavehIn the Islamic Penal Code adopted in 2013, the legislator of the Islamic Republic of Iran considered the definition of the crime of the crime of moharebeh (waging war against God or people) to be conditional on being armed, while, on one hand, the definition of a vast number of jurists does not regard this condition and in the known definition, according to some Jurisprudence and useful evidences, are the dominant assurance and not the avoiding, and on the other, it is implied from jurisprudential documents that if the battle is realized, the mentioned condition is not expressed and in case of non-occurrence of the battle and in case of only deprivation of public security, mentioning this condition does not mean that it constitutes a part of the subject, but it means the expression of the predominant condition. The present study is conducted through a descriptive-analytical method by means of library data and is written aiming at criticizing the law for interfering the condition of being armed in the crime of battle and at the same time its thoroughness in terms of this condition.https://feqh.semnan.ac.ir/article_4889_a22867b30371fa3393bd14a064743dd0.pdfbattlethe use of weaponspulling weaponsdominant conditionavoiding condition
spellingShingle Bahman Sabzaligol
Mohammad Rasool Ahangaran
Mahmood Ghayomzadeh
Narrative analysis of the term of "weapon" in the substantiation of the crime of moharebeh (A Critique of Article 279 of the Islamic Penal Code)
مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی
battle
the use of weapons
pulling weapons
dominant condition
avoiding condition
title Narrative analysis of the term of "weapon" in the substantiation of the crime of moharebeh (A Critique of Article 279 of the Islamic Penal Code)
title_full Narrative analysis of the term of "weapon" in the substantiation of the crime of moharebeh (A Critique of Article 279 of the Islamic Penal Code)
title_fullStr Narrative analysis of the term of "weapon" in the substantiation of the crime of moharebeh (A Critique of Article 279 of the Islamic Penal Code)
title_full_unstemmed Narrative analysis of the term of "weapon" in the substantiation of the crime of moharebeh (A Critique of Article 279 of the Islamic Penal Code)
title_short Narrative analysis of the term of "weapon" in the substantiation of the crime of moharebeh (A Critique of Article 279 of the Islamic Penal Code)
title_sort narrative analysis of the term of weapon in the substantiation of the crime of moharebeh a critique of article 279 of the islamic penal code
topic battle
the use of weapons
pulling weapons
dominant condition
avoiding condition
url https://feqh.semnan.ac.ir/article_4889_a22867b30371fa3393bd14a064743dd0.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bahmansabzaligol narrativeanalysisofthetermofweaponinthesubstantiationofthecrimeofmoharebehacritiqueofarticle279oftheislamicpenalcode
AT mohammadrasoolahangaran narrativeanalysisofthetermofweaponinthesubstantiationofthecrimeofmoharebehacritiqueofarticle279oftheislamicpenalcode
AT mahmoodghayomzadeh narrativeanalysisofthetermofweaponinthesubstantiationofthecrimeofmoharebehacritiqueofarticle279oftheislamicpenalcode