Assessment of the suitability of selected non-measuring models for dermal exposure estimation for the purposes of assessing compliance of working conditions with restrictions 71 and 76 in Annex XVII of the REACH regulation

Background Occupational exposure to chemicals occurs mainly through inhalation and the skin. The inhalation exposure assessment is regulated by law, while in Poland the method of conducting measurements for dermal exposure has not been indicated in the law. However, due to the restrictions 71 and 76...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Agnieszka Klimecka, Małgorzata Kupczewska-Dobecka, Katarzyna Konieczko, Joanna Jurewicz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine 2023-12-01
Series:Medycyna Pracy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://medpr.imp.lodz.pl/Ocena-przydatnosci-wybranych-modeli-bezpomiarowych-do-szacowania-narazenia-dermalnego,174766,0,2.html
_version_ 1797371097312657408
author Agnieszka Klimecka
Małgorzata Kupczewska-Dobecka
Katarzyna Konieczko
Joanna Jurewicz
author_facet Agnieszka Klimecka
Małgorzata Kupczewska-Dobecka
Katarzyna Konieczko
Joanna Jurewicz
author_sort Agnieszka Klimecka
collection DOAJ
description Background Occupational exposure to chemicals occurs mainly through inhalation and the skin. The inhalation exposure assessment is regulated by law, while in Poland the method of conducting measurements for dermal exposure has not been indicated in the law. However, due to the restrictions 71 and 76 from Annex XVII of REACH for 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) and N,N -dimethylformamide (DMF), exposure assessment by the dermal route is necessary. These restrictions require to ensure that exposure of workers is below the derived no-effect levels (DNELs) for dermal exposure. The aim of the work was assessment of suitability of selected non-measurement forecasting models for the estimation of dermal occupational exposure to chemicals for the purposes of assessing compliance of working conditions with the restrictions 71 and 76 of the REACH regulation. Material and Methods Three tools estimating dermal exposure, recommended by European Chemical Agency (ECHA), were selected: ECETOC TRA, RISKOFDERM and IH SkinPerm, which were used to estimate 2 exemplary workplaces. Results Results of the estimations of dermal exposure showed that non-measuring models are useful for fulfilling the obligations under restrictions 71 and 76 of Annex XVII of REACH. The type of exposure scenario and amount of data available for the workplace are crucial for the selection of the model. The ECETOC TRA was considered the best model for this type of analysis, whose main advantages are direct comparison of the output data in mg/kg/day with the DNEL value and use of standardized descriptors system. Conclusions Exposure modeling is a good and cheap way to determine the dermal exposure magnitude at workplaces, also to comply with the requirements of restrictions 71 and 76 of Annex XVII of REACH. The application of modeling in the case of occupational exposure by the dermal route is one of the solutions when it is necessary to comply with the DNEL for dermal exposure. Med Pr Work Health Saf. 2023;74(6):487–500.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T18:14:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-af31499246cd4ccf8fe522e9a3e6a773
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0465-5893
2353-1339
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T18:14:52Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine
record_format Article
series Medycyna Pracy
spelling doaj.art-af31499246cd4ccf8fe522e9a3e6a7732023-12-31T14:33:28ZengNofer Institute of Occupational MedicineMedycyna Pracy0465-58932353-13392023-12-0174648750010.13075/mp.5893.01450174766Assessment of the suitability of selected non-measuring models for dermal exposure estimation for the purposes of assessing compliance of working conditions with restrictions 71 and 76 in Annex XVII of the REACH regulationAgnieszka Klimecka0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8469-9557Małgorzata Kupczewska-Dobecka1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9633-9428Katarzyna Konieczko2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7878-5248Joanna Jurewicz3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9645-0134Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra med. Jerzego Nofera / Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łódź, Poland (Zakład Bezpieczeństwa Chemicznego / Department of Chemical Safety)Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra med. Jerzego Nofera / Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łódź, Poland (Zakład Bezpieczeństwa Chemicznego / Department of Chemical Safety)Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra med. Jerzego Nofera / Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łódź, Poland (Zakład Bezpieczeństwa Chemicznego / Department of Chemical Safety)Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra med. Jerzego Nofera / Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łódź, Poland (Zakład Bezpieczeństwa Chemicznego / Department of Chemical Safety)Background Occupational exposure to chemicals occurs mainly through inhalation and the skin. The inhalation exposure assessment is regulated by law, while in Poland the method of conducting measurements for dermal exposure has not been indicated in the law. However, due to the restrictions 71 and 76 from Annex XVII of REACH for 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) and N,N -dimethylformamide (DMF), exposure assessment by the dermal route is necessary. These restrictions require to ensure that exposure of workers is below the derived no-effect levels (DNELs) for dermal exposure. The aim of the work was assessment of suitability of selected non-measurement forecasting models for the estimation of dermal occupational exposure to chemicals for the purposes of assessing compliance of working conditions with the restrictions 71 and 76 of the REACH regulation. Material and Methods Three tools estimating dermal exposure, recommended by European Chemical Agency (ECHA), were selected: ECETOC TRA, RISKOFDERM and IH SkinPerm, which were used to estimate 2 exemplary workplaces. Results Results of the estimations of dermal exposure showed that non-measuring models are useful for fulfilling the obligations under restrictions 71 and 76 of Annex XVII of REACH. The type of exposure scenario and amount of data available for the workplace are crucial for the selection of the model. The ECETOC TRA was considered the best model for this type of analysis, whose main advantages are direct comparison of the output data in mg/kg/day with the DNEL value and use of standardized descriptors system. Conclusions Exposure modeling is a good and cheap way to determine the dermal exposure magnitude at workplaces, also to comply with the requirements of restrictions 71 and 76 of Annex XVII of REACH. The application of modeling in the case of occupational exposure by the dermal route is one of the solutions when it is necessary to comply with the DNEL for dermal exposure. Med Pr Work Health Saf. 2023;74(6):487–500.http://medpr.imp.lodz.pl/Ocena-przydatnosci-wybranych-modeli-bezpomiarowych-do-szacowania-narazenia-dermalnego,174766,0,2.htmloccupational exposuredermal exposureexposure assessmentmathematical modelsworkplacednel
spellingShingle Agnieszka Klimecka
Małgorzata Kupczewska-Dobecka
Katarzyna Konieczko
Joanna Jurewicz
Assessment of the suitability of selected non-measuring models for dermal exposure estimation for the purposes of assessing compliance of working conditions with restrictions 71 and 76 in Annex XVII of the REACH regulation
Medycyna Pracy
occupational exposure
dermal exposure
exposure assessment
mathematical models
workplace
dnel
title Assessment of the suitability of selected non-measuring models for dermal exposure estimation for the purposes of assessing compliance of working conditions with restrictions 71 and 76 in Annex XVII of the REACH regulation
title_full Assessment of the suitability of selected non-measuring models for dermal exposure estimation for the purposes of assessing compliance of working conditions with restrictions 71 and 76 in Annex XVII of the REACH regulation
title_fullStr Assessment of the suitability of selected non-measuring models for dermal exposure estimation for the purposes of assessing compliance of working conditions with restrictions 71 and 76 in Annex XVII of the REACH regulation
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the suitability of selected non-measuring models for dermal exposure estimation for the purposes of assessing compliance of working conditions with restrictions 71 and 76 in Annex XVII of the REACH regulation
title_short Assessment of the suitability of selected non-measuring models for dermal exposure estimation for the purposes of assessing compliance of working conditions with restrictions 71 and 76 in Annex XVII of the REACH regulation
title_sort assessment of the suitability of selected non measuring models for dermal exposure estimation for the purposes of assessing compliance of working conditions with restrictions 71 and 76 in annex xvii of the reach regulation
topic occupational exposure
dermal exposure
exposure assessment
mathematical models
workplace
dnel
url http://medpr.imp.lodz.pl/Ocena-przydatnosci-wybranych-modeli-bezpomiarowych-do-szacowania-narazenia-dermalnego,174766,0,2.html
work_keys_str_mv AT agnieszkaklimecka assessmentofthesuitabilityofselectednonmeasuringmodelsfordermalexposureestimationforthepurposesofassessingcomplianceofworkingconditionswithrestrictions71and76inannexxviiofthereachregulation
AT małgorzatakupczewskadobecka assessmentofthesuitabilityofselectednonmeasuringmodelsfordermalexposureestimationforthepurposesofassessingcomplianceofworkingconditionswithrestrictions71and76inannexxviiofthereachregulation
AT katarzynakonieczko assessmentofthesuitabilityofselectednonmeasuringmodelsfordermalexposureestimationforthepurposesofassessingcomplianceofworkingconditionswithrestrictions71and76inannexxviiofthereachregulation
AT joannajurewicz assessmentofthesuitabilityofselectednonmeasuringmodelsfordermalexposureestimationforthepurposesofassessingcomplianceofworkingconditionswithrestrictions71and76inannexxviiofthereachregulation