Coblation versus traditional tonsillectomy: A double blind randomized ontrolled trial

Background: Coblation tonsillectomy is a new surgical technique and demands further research to be proven as a suitable and standard method of tonsillectomy. This study compares coblation and traditional tonsillectomy techniques in view of their advantages and complications. Methods: In a prospecti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammadreza Omrani, Behrouz Barati, Navid Omidifar, Ahmad Reza Okhovvat, Seyed Amirhossein Ghazizadeh Hashemi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2012-01-01
Series:Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2012;volume=17;issue=1;spage=45;epage=50;aulast=Omrani
_version_ 1811234317761773568
author Mohammadreza Omrani
Behrouz Barati
Navid Omidifar
Ahmad Reza Okhovvat
Seyed Amirhossein Ghazizadeh Hashemi
author_facet Mohammadreza Omrani
Behrouz Barati
Navid Omidifar
Ahmad Reza Okhovvat
Seyed Amirhossein Ghazizadeh Hashemi
author_sort Mohammadreza Omrani
collection DOAJ
description Background: Coblation tonsillectomy is a new surgical technique and demands further research to be proven as a suitable and standard method of tonsillectomy. This study compares coblation and traditional tonsillectomy techniques in view of their advantages and complications. Methods: In a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial information on operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, time needed to regain the normal diet and activity and post-operative hemorrhage were gathered and compared between two groups containing 47 patients in each group. Results: We found statistically significant differences in operation time (p < 0.05), intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.05), postoperative pain (p < 0.001), time needed to find back the normal diet (p < 0.001) and normal activity (p < 0.001). However, post operation hemorrhage (p > 0.5) was not significantly different between two groups. Conclusions: This study revealed a significantly less intraoperative or postoperative complications and morbidity in coblation tonsillectomy in comparison with traditional method. Coblation was associated with less pain and quick return to normal diet and daily activity. These findings addressed coblation tonsillectomy as an advanced method.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T11:34:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-af3395f6c4344a269be8a8c7c5a76d0e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-1995
1735-7136
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T11:34:35Z
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-af3395f6c4344a269be8a8c7c5a76d0e2022-12-22T03:34:53ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Research in Medical Sciences1735-19951735-71362012-01-011714550Coblation versus traditional tonsillectomy: A double blind randomized ontrolled trialMohammadreza OmraniBehrouz BaratiNavid OmidifarAhmad Reza OkhovvatSeyed Amirhossein Ghazizadeh HashemiBackground: Coblation tonsillectomy is a new surgical technique and demands further research to be proven as a suitable and standard method of tonsillectomy. This study compares coblation and traditional tonsillectomy techniques in view of their advantages and complications. Methods: In a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial information on operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, time needed to regain the normal diet and activity and post-operative hemorrhage were gathered and compared between two groups containing 47 patients in each group. Results: We found statistically significant differences in operation time (p < 0.05), intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.05), postoperative pain (p < 0.001), time needed to find back the normal diet (p < 0.001) and normal activity (p < 0.001). However, post operation hemorrhage (p > 0.5) was not significantly different between two groups. Conclusions: This study revealed a significantly less intraoperative or postoperative complications and morbidity in coblation tonsillectomy in comparison with traditional method. Coblation was associated with less pain and quick return to normal diet and daily activity. These findings addressed coblation tonsillectomy as an advanced method.http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2012;volume=17;issue=1;spage=45;epage=50;aulast=OmraniCoblationTonsillectomyComplications.
spellingShingle Mohammadreza Omrani
Behrouz Barati
Navid Omidifar
Ahmad Reza Okhovvat
Seyed Amirhossein Ghazizadeh Hashemi
Coblation versus traditional tonsillectomy: A double blind randomized ontrolled trial
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Coblation
Tonsillectomy
Complications.
title Coblation versus traditional tonsillectomy: A double blind randomized ontrolled trial
title_full Coblation versus traditional tonsillectomy: A double blind randomized ontrolled trial
title_fullStr Coblation versus traditional tonsillectomy: A double blind randomized ontrolled trial
title_full_unstemmed Coblation versus traditional tonsillectomy: A double blind randomized ontrolled trial
title_short Coblation versus traditional tonsillectomy: A double blind randomized ontrolled trial
title_sort coblation versus traditional tonsillectomy a double blind randomized ontrolled trial
topic Coblation
Tonsillectomy
Complications.
url http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2012;volume=17;issue=1;spage=45;epage=50;aulast=Omrani
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadrezaomrani coblationversustraditionaltonsillectomyadoubleblindrandomizedontrolledtrial
AT behrouzbarati coblationversustraditionaltonsillectomyadoubleblindrandomizedontrolledtrial
AT navidomidifar coblationversustraditionaltonsillectomyadoubleblindrandomizedontrolledtrial
AT ahmadrezaokhovvat coblationversustraditionaltonsillectomyadoubleblindrandomizedontrolledtrial
AT seyedamirhosseinghazizadehhashemi coblationversustraditionaltonsillectomyadoubleblindrandomizedontrolledtrial