California school lead testing results and the new lead and copper rule
Under the revised lead and copper rule, schools and daycare centers will need to conduct lead and copper sampling. The California Division of Drinking Water required Public Water Systems to assist local schools in testing water for lead between 2017 and 2020. There were 43,803 samples collected from...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
IWA Publishing
2022-09-01
|
Series: | Water Practice and Technology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://wpt.iwaponline.com/content/17/9/1781 |
_version_ | 1811331168999571456 |
---|---|
author | David Eugene Kimbrough |
author_facet | David Eugene Kimbrough |
author_sort | David Eugene Kimbrough |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Under the revised lead and copper rule, schools and daycare centers will need to conduct lead and copper sampling. The California Division of Drinking Water required Public Water Systems to assist local schools in testing water for lead between 2017 and 2020. There were 43,803 samples collected from 7,058 schools in 864 school districts. In total, 5.2% of the samples had lead present in concentrations greater than the Detection Limit for Reporting (DLR) of 5 μg/L, and 1.1% of samples had lead concentrations greater than the Action Level (AL) of 15 μg/L. When broken down by counties, these patterns are consistent throughout most of the State. Drinking fountains had significantly lower frequencies of results above the DLR and AL than samples collected from sinks and food preparation areas. Chloride, bicarbonate, and pH appeared to influence the frequency of results above the DLR and AL.
HIGHLIGHTS
In total, 43,803 samples were collected from 7,058 schools in 864 school districts in California and analyzed for lead.;
Approximately 5% of all samples had results above 5 μg/L and 1% of samples had results above 15 μg/L.;
Drinking fountains had a lower frequency of results above 5 and 15 μg/L than sinks but higher than bottle fillers.;
Lead leaching was influenced by bicarbonate, chloride, and pH.; |
first_indexed | 2024-04-13T16:16:29Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-af3750245a524819b0c888a2241772b9 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1751-231X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-13T16:16:29Z |
publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
publisher | IWA Publishing |
record_format | Article |
series | Water Practice and Technology |
spelling | doaj.art-af3750245a524819b0c888a2241772b92022-12-22T02:40:04ZengIWA PublishingWater Practice and Technology1751-231X2022-09-011791781180110.2166/wpt.2022.100100California school lead testing results and the new lead and copper ruleDavid Eugene Kimbrough0 CDK Consulting Group, 129 South Del Mar, #413, San Gabriel, CA, USA, 91778-9998 Under the revised lead and copper rule, schools and daycare centers will need to conduct lead and copper sampling. The California Division of Drinking Water required Public Water Systems to assist local schools in testing water for lead between 2017 and 2020. There were 43,803 samples collected from 7,058 schools in 864 school districts. In total, 5.2% of the samples had lead present in concentrations greater than the Detection Limit for Reporting (DLR) of 5 μg/L, and 1.1% of samples had lead concentrations greater than the Action Level (AL) of 15 μg/L. When broken down by counties, these patterns are consistent throughout most of the State. Drinking fountains had significantly lower frequencies of results above the DLR and AL than samples collected from sinks and food preparation areas. Chloride, bicarbonate, and pH appeared to influence the frequency of results above the DLR and AL. HIGHLIGHTS In total, 43,803 samples were collected from 7,058 schools in 864 school districts in California and analyzed for lead.; Approximately 5% of all samples had results above 5 μg/L and 1% of samples had results above 15 μg/L.; Drinking fountains had a lower frequency of results above 5 and 15 μg/L than sinks but higher than bottle fillers.; Lead leaching was influenced by bicarbonate, chloride, and pH.;http://wpt.iwaponline.com/content/17/9/1781brass corrosiondezincificationlead-leachingschool sampling |
spellingShingle | David Eugene Kimbrough California school lead testing results and the new lead and copper rule Water Practice and Technology brass corrosion dezincification lead-leaching school sampling |
title | California school lead testing results and the new lead and copper rule |
title_full | California school lead testing results and the new lead and copper rule |
title_fullStr | California school lead testing results and the new lead and copper rule |
title_full_unstemmed | California school lead testing results and the new lead and copper rule |
title_short | California school lead testing results and the new lead and copper rule |
title_sort | california school lead testing results and the new lead and copper rule |
topic | brass corrosion dezincification lead-leaching school sampling |
url | http://wpt.iwaponline.com/content/17/9/1781 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davideugenekimbrough californiaschoolleadtestingresultsandthenewleadandcopperrule |