Stage or size? The identity of anatomical and visual outcomes in stage 3 and stage 4 idiopathic macular holes after vitrectomy

Abstract Background Several previous reports suggested that stage 4 idiopathic macular holes (IMHs) may exhibit lower rate of anatomical success and poorer functional results comparing with stage 3 IMHs, while some others showed no differences. Actually, few studies focused on comparison of prognosi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yanping Yu, Xida Liang, Zengyi Wang, Jing Wang, Biying Qi, Wu Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-03-01
Series:BMC Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02820-9
_version_ 1797865264061087744
author Yanping Yu
Xida Liang
Zengyi Wang
Jing Wang
Biying Qi
Wu Liu
author_facet Yanping Yu
Xida Liang
Zengyi Wang
Jing Wang
Biying Qi
Wu Liu
author_sort Yanping Yu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Several previous reports suggested that stage 4 idiopathic macular holes (IMHs) may exhibit lower rate of anatomical success and poorer functional results comparing with stage 3 IMHs, while some others showed no differences. Actually, few studies focused on comparison of prognosis between stage 3 and stage 4 IMHs. Our previous study found that IMHs of these two stages demonstrate similar preoperative characteristics, and this study aims to compare anatomical and visual outcomes of IMHs between stage 3 and stage 4, and tries to figure out the outcome-associated factors. Methods This retrospective consecutive case series reviewed 317 eyes with IMHs of stage 3 and stage 4 from 296 patients who underwent vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling. Preoperative characteristics like age, gender, and hole size, and intraoperative interventions such as combined cataract surgery were evaluated. Outcome measures included the primary closure rate (type 1), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), foveal retinal thickness (FRT) and prevalence of outer retinal defect (ORD) at the last visit. The pre-, intra-, and post-operative information were respectively compared between stage 3 and stage 4. Results The preoperative characteristics and intraoperative interventions exhibited no significant differences between stages. With comparable follow-up durations (6.6 vs. 6.7 months, P = 0.79), IMHs of the two stages exhibited similar primary closure rate (91.2% vs. 91.8%, P = 0.85), BCVA (0.51 ± 0.12 vs. 0.53 ± 0.11, P = 0.78), FRT (134.8 ± 55.5 μm vs. 138.8 ± 60.7 μm, P = 0.58), and prevalence of ORD (55.1% vs. 52.6%, P = 0.39). IMHs, either < 650 μm or larger, exhibited no significant difference in outcomes between the two stages. However, smaller IMHs (< 650 μm) demonstrated higher rate of primary closure (97.6% vs. 80.8%, P < 0.001), better postoperative BCVA (0.58 ± 0.26 vs. 0.37 ± 0.24, P < 0.001), and thicker postoperative FRT (150.2 ± 54.0 vs. 104.3 ± 52.0, P < 0.001) comparing with larger ones regardless of stage. Conclusion IMHs of stage 3 and stage 4 exhibited considerable identity of anatomical and visual outcomes. In large IMHs, the hole size, instead of stage, may be more important for prediction of surgical outcomes and choice of surgical techniques.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T23:05:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-af39d19a29a24daca5e2acb29b0fbca0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2415
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T23:05:31Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-af39d19a29a24daca5e2acb29b0fbca02023-03-22T10:44:21ZengBMCBMC Ophthalmology1471-24152023-03-012311710.1186/s12886-023-02820-9Stage or size? The identity of anatomical and visual outcomes in stage 3 and stage 4 idiopathic macular holes after vitrectomyYanping Yu0Xida Liang1Zengyi Wang2Jing Wang3Biying Qi4Wu Liu5Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Tongren Eye Centre, Capital Medical UniversityBeijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Tongren Eye Centre, Capital Medical UniversityBeijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Tongren Eye Centre, Capital Medical UniversityBeijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Tongren Eye Centre, Capital Medical UniversityBeijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Tongren Eye Centre, Capital Medical UniversityBeijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Tongren Eye Centre, Capital Medical UniversityAbstract Background Several previous reports suggested that stage 4 idiopathic macular holes (IMHs) may exhibit lower rate of anatomical success and poorer functional results comparing with stage 3 IMHs, while some others showed no differences. Actually, few studies focused on comparison of prognosis between stage 3 and stage 4 IMHs. Our previous study found that IMHs of these two stages demonstrate similar preoperative characteristics, and this study aims to compare anatomical and visual outcomes of IMHs between stage 3 and stage 4, and tries to figure out the outcome-associated factors. Methods This retrospective consecutive case series reviewed 317 eyes with IMHs of stage 3 and stage 4 from 296 patients who underwent vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling. Preoperative characteristics like age, gender, and hole size, and intraoperative interventions such as combined cataract surgery were evaluated. Outcome measures included the primary closure rate (type 1), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), foveal retinal thickness (FRT) and prevalence of outer retinal defect (ORD) at the last visit. The pre-, intra-, and post-operative information were respectively compared between stage 3 and stage 4. Results The preoperative characteristics and intraoperative interventions exhibited no significant differences between stages. With comparable follow-up durations (6.6 vs. 6.7 months, P = 0.79), IMHs of the two stages exhibited similar primary closure rate (91.2% vs. 91.8%, P = 0.85), BCVA (0.51 ± 0.12 vs. 0.53 ± 0.11, P = 0.78), FRT (134.8 ± 55.5 μm vs. 138.8 ± 60.7 μm, P = 0.58), and prevalence of ORD (55.1% vs. 52.6%, P = 0.39). IMHs, either < 650 μm or larger, exhibited no significant difference in outcomes between the two stages. However, smaller IMHs (< 650 μm) demonstrated higher rate of primary closure (97.6% vs. 80.8%, P < 0.001), better postoperative BCVA (0.58 ± 0.26 vs. 0.37 ± 0.24, P < 0.001), and thicker postoperative FRT (150.2 ± 54.0 vs. 104.3 ± 52.0, P < 0.001) comparing with larger ones regardless of stage. Conclusion IMHs of stage 3 and stage 4 exhibited considerable identity of anatomical and visual outcomes. In large IMHs, the hole size, instead of stage, may be more important for prediction of surgical outcomes and choice of surgical techniques.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02820-9Idiopathic macular holeMinimum linear diameterOptical coherence tomographyStageVitrectomy
spellingShingle Yanping Yu
Xida Liang
Zengyi Wang
Jing Wang
Biying Qi
Wu Liu
Stage or size? The identity of anatomical and visual outcomes in stage 3 and stage 4 idiopathic macular holes after vitrectomy
BMC Ophthalmology
Idiopathic macular hole
Minimum linear diameter
Optical coherence tomography
Stage
Vitrectomy
title Stage or size? The identity of anatomical and visual outcomes in stage 3 and stage 4 idiopathic macular holes after vitrectomy
title_full Stage or size? The identity of anatomical and visual outcomes in stage 3 and stage 4 idiopathic macular holes after vitrectomy
title_fullStr Stage or size? The identity of anatomical and visual outcomes in stage 3 and stage 4 idiopathic macular holes after vitrectomy
title_full_unstemmed Stage or size? The identity of anatomical and visual outcomes in stage 3 and stage 4 idiopathic macular holes after vitrectomy
title_short Stage or size? The identity of anatomical and visual outcomes in stage 3 and stage 4 idiopathic macular holes after vitrectomy
title_sort stage or size the identity of anatomical and visual outcomes in stage 3 and stage 4 idiopathic macular holes after vitrectomy
topic Idiopathic macular hole
Minimum linear diameter
Optical coherence tomography
Stage
Vitrectomy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02820-9
work_keys_str_mv AT yanpingyu stageorsizetheidentityofanatomicalandvisualoutcomesinstage3andstage4idiopathicmacularholesaftervitrectomy
AT xidaliang stageorsizetheidentityofanatomicalandvisualoutcomesinstage3andstage4idiopathicmacularholesaftervitrectomy
AT zengyiwang stageorsizetheidentityofanatomicalandvisualoutcomesinstage3andstage4idiopathicmacularholesaftervitrectomy
AT jingwang stageorsizetheidentityofanatomicalandvisualoutcomesinstage3andstage4idiopathicmacularholesaftervitrectomy
AT biyingqi stageorsizetheidentityofanatomicalandvisualoutcomesinstage3andstage4idiopathicmacularholesaftervitrectomy
AT wuliu stageorsizetheidentityofanatomicalandvisualoutcomesinstage3andstage4idiopathicmacularholesaftervitrectomy