Mesoscale Simulation of Laser Powder Bed Fusion with an Increased Layer Thickness for AlSi10Mg Alloy

Low performance is considered one of the main drawbacks of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) technology. In the present work, the effect of the AlSi10Mg powder layer thickness on the laser melting process was investigated to improve the LPBF building rate. A high-fidelity simulation of the melt pool fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Bogdanova, Stanislav Chernyshikhin, Andrey Zakirov, Boris Zotov, Leonid Fedorenko, Sergei Belousov, Anastasia Perepelkina, Boris Korneev, Maria Lyange, Ivan Pelevin, Inna Iskandarova, Ella Dzidziguri, Boris Potapkin, Alexander Gromov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-01-01
Series:Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2504-4494/8/1/7
_version_ 1827343417031524352
author Maria Bogdanova
Stanislav Chernyshikhin
Andrey Zakirov
Boris Zotov
Leonid Fedorenko
Sergei Belousov
Anastasia Perepelkina
Boris Korneev
Maria Lyange
Ivan Pelevin
Inna Iskandarova
Ella Dzidziguri
Boris Potapkin
Alexander Gromov
author_facet Maria Bogdanova
Stanislav Chernyshikhin
Andrey Zakirov
Boris Zotov
Leonid Fedorenko
Sergei Belousov
Anastasia Perepelkina
Boris Korneev
Maria Lyange
Ivan Pelevin
Inna Iskandarova
Ella Dzidziguri
Boris Potapkin
Alexander Gromov
author_sort Maria Bogdanova
collection DOAJ
description Low performance is considered one of the main drawbacks of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) technology. In the present work, the effect of the AlSi10Mg powder layer thickness on the laser melting process was investigated to improve the LPBF building rate. A high-fidelity simulation of the melt pool formation was performed for different thicknesses of the powder bed using the Kintech Simulation Software for Additive Manufacturing (KiSSAM, version cd8e01d) developed by the authors. The powder bed after the recoating operation was obtained by the discrete element method. The laser energy deposition on the powder particles and the substrate was simulated by ray tracing. For the validation of the model, an experimental analysis of single tracks was performed on two types of substrates. The first substrate was manufactured directly with LPBF technology, while the second was cast. The simulation was carried out for various combinations of process parameters, predominantly with a high energy input, which provided a sufficient remelting depth. The calculations revealed the unstable keyhole mode appearance associated with the low absorptivity of the aluminum alloy at a scanning speed of 300 mm/s for all levels of the laser power (325–375 W). The results allowed formulating the criteria for the lack of fusion emerging during LPBF with an increased layer thickness. This work is expected to provide a scientific basis for the analysis of the maximum layer thickness via simulation to increase the performance of the technology.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T22:26:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-af3af17b9cf245dbb46e06d43c2abd3e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2504-4494
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T22:26:55Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
spelling doaj.art-af3af17b9cf245dbb46e06d43c2abd3e2024-02-23T15:22:50ZengMDPI AGJournal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing2504-44942024-01-0181710.3390/jmmp8010007Mesoscale Simulation of Laser Powder Bed Fusion with an Increased Layer Thickness for AlSi10Mg AlloyMaria Bogdanova0Stanislav Chernyshikhin1Andrey Zakirov2Boris Zotov3Leonid Fedorenko4Sergei Belousov5Anastasia Perepelkina6Boris Korneev7Maria Lyange8Ivan Pelevin9Inna Iskandarova10Ella Dzidziguri11Boris Potapkin12Alexander Gromov13Kintech Lab Ltd., 3rd Khoroshevskaya St. 12, 123298 Moscow, RussiaCatalysis Lab, National University of Science and Technology MISIS, Leninskiy Prospekt 4, 119049 Moscow, RussiaKintech Lab Ltd., 3rd Khoroshevskaya St. 12, 123298 Moscow, RussiaCatalysis Lab, National University of Science and Technology MISIS, Leninskiy Prospekt 4, 119049 Moscow, RussiaCatalysis Lab, National University of Science and Technology MISIS, Leninskiy Prospekt 4, 119049 Moscow, RussiaKintech Lab Ltd., 3rd Khoroshevskaya St. 12, 123298 Moscow, RussiaKintech Lab Ltd., 3rd Khoroshevskaya St. 12, 123298 Moscow, RussiaKintech Lab Ltd., 3rd Khoroshevskaya St. 12, 123298 Moscow, RussiaCatalysis Lab, National University of Science and Technology MISIS, Leninskiy Prospekt 4, 119049 Moscow, RussiaCatalysis Lab, National University of Science and Technology MISIS, Leninskiy Prospekt 4, 119049 Moscow, RussiaKintech Lab Ltd., 3rd Khoroshevskaya St. 12, 123298 Moscow, RussiaCatalysis Lab, National University of Science and Technology MISIS, Leninskiy Prospekt 4, 119049 Moscow, RussiaKintech Lab Ltd., 3rd Khoroshevskaya St. 12, 123298 Moscow, RussiaCatalysis Lab, National University of Science and Technology MISIS, Leninskiy Prospekt 4, 119049 Moscow, RussiaLow performance is considered one of the main drawbacks of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) technology. In the present work, the effect of the AlSi10Mg powder layer thickness on the laser melting process was investigated to improve the LPBF building rate. A high-fidelity simulation of the melt pool formation was performed for different thicknesses of the powder bed using the Kintech Simulation Software for Additive Manufacturing (KiSSAM, version cd8e01d) developed by the authors. The powder bed after the recoating operation was obtained by the discrete element method. The laser energy deposition on the powder particles and the substrate was simulated by ray tracing. For the validation of the model, an experimental analysis of single tracks was performed on two types of substrates. The first substrate was manufactured directly with LPBF technology, while the second was cast. The simulation was carried out for various combinations of process parameters, predominantly with a high energy input, which provided a sufficient remelting depth. The calculations revealed the unstable keyhole mode appearance associated with the low absorptivity of the aluminum alloy at a scanning speed of 300 mm/s for all levels of the laser power (325–375 W). The results allowed formulating the criteria for the lack of fusion emerging during LPBF with an increased layer thickness. This work is expected to provide a scientific basis for the analysis of the maximum layer thickness via simulation to increase the performance of the technology.https://www.mdpi.com/2504-4494/8/1/7building rateLPBFmesoscale simulation LBMperformance GPUAlSi10Mglayer thickness
spellingShingle Maria Bogdanova
Stanislav Chernyshikhin
Andrey Zakirov
Boris Zotov
Leonid Fedorenko
Sergei Belousov
Anastasia Perepelkina
Boris Korneev
Maria Lyange
Ivan Pelevin
Inna Iskandarova
Ella Dzidziguri
Boris Potapkin
Alexander Gromov
Mesoscale Simulation of Laser Powder Bed Fusion with an Increased Layer Thickness for AlSi10Mg Alloy
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
building rate
LPBF
mesoscale simulation LBM
performance GPU
AlSi10Mg
layer thickness
title Mesoscale Simulation of Laser Powder Bed Fusion with an Increased Layer Thickness for AlSi10Mg Alloy
title_full Mesoscale Simulation of Laser Powder Bed Fusion with an Increased Layer Thickness for AlSi10Mg Alloy
title_fullStr Mesoscale Simulation of Laser Powder Bed Fusion with an Increased Layer Thickness for AlSi10Mg Alloy
title_full_unstemmed Mesoscale Simulation of Laser Powder Bed Fusion with an Increased Layer Thickness for AlSi10Mg Alloy
title_short Mesoscale Simulation of Laser Powder Bed Fusion with an Increased Layer Thickness for AlSi10Mg Alloy
title_sort mesoscale simulation of laser powder bed fusion with an increased layer thickness for alsi10mg alloy
topic building rate
LPBF
mesoscale simulation LBM
performance GPU
AlSi10Mg
layer thickness
url https://www.mdpi.com/2504-4494/8/1/7
work_keys_str_mv AT mariabogdanova mesoscalesimulationoflaserpowderbedfusionwithanincreasedlayerthicknessforalsi10mgalloy
AT stanislavchernyshikhin mesoscalesimulationoflaserpowderbedfusionwithanincreasedlayerthicknessforalsi10mgalloy
AT andreyzakirov mesoscalesimulationoflaserpowderbedfusionwithanincreasedlayerthicknessforalsi10mgalloy
AT boriszotov mesoscalesimulationoflaserpowderbedfusionwithanincreasedlayerthicknessforalsi10mgalloy
AT leonidfedorenko mesoscalesimulationoflaserpowderbedfusionwithanincreasedlayerthicknessforalsi10mgalloy
AT sergeibelousov mesoscalesimulationoflaserpowderbedfusionwithanincreasedlayerthicknessforalsi10mgalloy
AT anastasiaperepelkina mesoscalesimulationoflaserpowderbedfusionwithanincreasedlayerthicknessforalsi10mgalloy
AT boriskorneev mesoscalesimulationoflaserpowderbedfusionwithanincreasedlayerthicknessforalsi10mgalloy
AT marialyange mesoscalesimulationoflaserpowderbedfusionwithanincreasedlayerthicknessforalsi10mgalloy
AT ivanpelevin mesoscalesimulationoflaserpowderbedfusionwithanincreasedlayerthicknessforalsi10mgalloy
AT innaiskandarova mesoscalesimulationoflaserpowderbedfusionwithanincreasedlayerthicknessforalsi10mgalloy
AT elladzidziguri mesoscalesimulationoflaserpowderbedfusionwithanincreasedlayerthicknessforalsi10mgalloy
AT borispotapkin mesoscalesimulationoflaserpowderbedfusionwithanincreasedlayerthicknessforalsi10mgalloy
AT alexandergromov mesoscalesimulationoflaserpowderbedfusionwithanincreasedlayerthicknessforalsi10mgalloy