Niedualna uważność a stan samādhi w kontekście badań neurofenomenologicznych

The aim of this paper is to compare various meditative states, such as Buddhist dhyāna‑s, yogic nirbīja samādhi and nondual awareness (Tib. gñis‑med). The primary source texts I refere to are Yogasūtras of Patañjali, Ānāpānasmṛtisūtra (MN 118), Samādhisūtra (AN 4.41), The Tibetan Yogas of Dream and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Piotr PŁANETA
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Pedagogical University of Krakow 2016-12-01
Series:Argument
Online Access:http://argumentwp.vipserv.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/pdfv6n2/argument_v6_n2_P%C5%82aneta.pdf
_version_ 1811236258935996416
author Piotr PŁANETA
author_facet Piotr PŁANETA
author_sort Piotr PŁANETA
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this paper is to compare various meditative states, such as Buddhist dhyāna‑s, yogic nirbīja samādhi and nondual awareness (Tib. gñis‑med). The primary source texts I refere to are Yogasūtras of Patañjali, Ānāpānasmṛtisūtra (MN 118), Samādhisūtra (AN 4.41), The Tibetan Yogas of Dream and Sleep. I also discuss some relevant claims of contemporary empirical studies. First, I define the key terms used in Eastern meditation studies as well as in neurophenomenology, a contemporary method applied to examining the meditative states of mind, such as samādhi, dhyāna, and śamatha. Inspired by Shinzen Young, I distinguish three groups of meditative states that might be identified with nondual awareness. These three groups are: (1) the second, the third and fourth Buddhist dhyāna being equivalent to nirvicāra samādhi and nirānanda samādhi in the classical Indian yoga; (2) nirbīja samādhi and (3) nondual awareness, typical to the Mahayāna contemplative traditions. I explain why we can recognize each of the above states as nondual awareness and how they differ from each other. Then, I make a comparison between meditation practice explained in Ānāpānasmṛtisūtra and nondual awareness presented in the Tibetan Buddhism. Besides, I discuss the above kinds of mental states in terms of recent neurophenomenological findings. While doing so, I am trying to demonstrate that our understanding of meditation can benefit from the empirical studies which help us to objectify this kind of subjective experience, to some degree, if they are given an adequate place in our study.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T12:06:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-af3c817af3944e4a8cfb4ea214529be7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2083-6635
2084-1043
language deu
last_indexed 2024-04-12T12:06:56Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Pedagogical University of Krakow
record_format Article
series Argument
spelling doaj.art-af3c817af3944e4a8cfb4ea214529be72022-12-22T03:33:41ZdeuPedagogical University of KrakowArgument2083-66352084-10432016-12-0162373390Niedualna uważność a stan samādhi w kontekście badań neurofenomenologicznychPiotr PŁANETA0Pedagogical University of CracowThe aim of this paper is to compare various meditative states, such as Buddhist dhyāna‑s, yogic nirbīja samādhi and nondual awareness (Tib. gñis‑med). The primary source texts I refere to are Yogasūtras of Patañjali, Ānāpānasmṛtisūtra (MN 118), Samādhisūtra (AN 4.41), The Tibetan Yogas of Dream and Sleep. I also discuss some relevant claims of contemporary empirical studies. First, I define the key terms used in Eastern meditation studies as well as in neurophenomenology, a contemporary method applied to examining the meditative states of mind, such as samādhi, dhyāna, and śamatha. Inspired by Shinzen Young, I distinguish three groups of meditative states that might be identified with nondual awareness. These three groups are: (1) the second, the third and fourth Buddhist dhyāna being equivalent to nirvicāra samādhi and nirānanda samādhi in the classical Indian yoga; (2) nirbīja samādhi and (3) nondual awareness, typical to the Mahayāna contemplative traditions. I explain why we can recognize each of the above states as nondual awareness and how they differ from each other. Then, I make a comparison between meditation practice explained in Ānāpānasmṛtisūtra and nondual awareness presented in the Tibetan Buddhism. Besides, I discuss the above kinds of mental states in terms of recent neurophenomenological findings. While doing so, I am trying to demonstrate that our understanding of meditation can benefit from the empirical studies which help us to objectify this kind of subjective experience, to some degree, if they are given an adequate place in our study.http://argumentwp.vipserv.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/pdfv6n2/argument_v6_n2_P%C5%82aneta.pdf
spellingShingle Piotr PŁANETA
Niedualna uważność a stan samādhi w kontekście badań neurofenomenologicznych
Argument
title Niedualna uważność a stan samādhi w kontekście badań neurofenomenologicznych
title_full Niedualna uważność a stan samādhi w kontekście badań neurofenomenologicznych
title_fullStr Niedualna uważność a stan samādhi w kontekście badań neurofenomenologicznych
title_full_unstemmed Niedualna uważność a stan samādhi w kontekście badań neurofenomenologicznych
title_short Niedualna uważność a stan samādhi w kontekście badań neurofenomenologicznych
title_sort niedualna uwaznosc a stan samadhi w kontekscie badan neurofenomenologicznych
url http://argumentwp.vipserv.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/pdfv6n2/argument_v6_n2_P%C5%82aneta.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT piotrpłaneta niedualnauwaznoscastansamadhiwkonteksciebadanneurofenomenologicznych