Long-term outcome of COVID-19 patients treated with helmet noninvasive ventilation vs. high-flow nasal oxygen: a randomized trial

Abstract Background Long-term outcomes of patients treated with helmet noninvasive ventilation (NIV) are unknown: safety concerns regarding the risk of patient self-inflicted lung injury and delayed intubation exist when NIV is applied in hypoxemic patients. We assessed the 6-month outcome of patien...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Teresa Michi, Chiara Mattana, Luca S. Menga, Maria Grazia Bocci, Melania Cesarano, Tommaso Rosà, Maria Rosaria Gualano, Jonathan Montomoli, Savino Spadaro, Matteo Tosato, Elisabetta Rota, Francesco Landi, Salvatore L. Cutuli, Eloisa S. Tanzarella, Gabriele Pintaudi, Edoardo Piervincenzi, Giuseppe Bello, Tommaso Tonetti, Paola Rucci, Gennaro De Pascale, Salvatore M. Maggiore, Domenico Luca Grieco, Giorgio Conti, Massimo Antonelli, for the Gemelli COVID-ICU study group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-05-01
Series:Journal of Intensive Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00669-0
_version_ 1827943545846104064
author Teresa Michi
Chiara Mattana
Luca S. Menga
Maria Grazia Bocci
Melania Cesarano
Tommaso Rosà
Maria Rosaria Gualano
Jonathan Montomoli
Savino Spadaro
Matteo Tosato
Elisabetta Rota
Francesco Landi
Salvatore L. Cutuli
Eloisa S. Tanzarella
Gabriele Pintaudi
Edoardo Piervincenzi
Giuseppe Bello
Tommaso Tonetti
Paola Rucci
Gennaro De Pascale
Salvatore M. Maggiore
Domenico Luca Grieco
Giorgio Conti
Massimo Antonelli
for the Gemelli COVID-ICU study group
author_facet Teresa Michi
Chiara Mattana
Luca S. Menga
Maria Grazia Bocci
Melania Cesarano
Tommaso Rosà
Maria Rosaria Gualano
Jonathan Montomoli
Savino Spadaro
Matteo Tosato
Elisabetta Rota
Francesco Landi
Salvatore L. Cutuli
Eloisa S. Tanzarella
Gabriele Pintaudi
Edoardo Piervincenzi
Giuseppe Bello
Tommaso Tonetti
Paola Rucci
Gennaro De Pascale
Salvatore M. Maggiore
Domenico Luca Grieco
Giorgio Conti
Massimo Antonelli
for the Gemelli COVID-ICU study group
author_sort Teresa Michi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Long-term outcomes of patients treated with helmet noninvasive ventilation (NIV) are unknown: safety concerns regarding the risk of patient self-inflicted lung injury and delayed intubation exist when NIV is applied in hypoxemic patients. We assessed the 6-month outcome of patients who received helmet NIV or high-flow nasal oxygen for COVID-19 hypoxemic respiratory failure. Methods In this prespecified analysis of a randomized trial of helmet NIV versus high-flow nasal oxygen (HENIVOT), clinical status, physical performance (6-min-walking-test and 30-s chair stand test), respiratory function and quality of life (EuroQoL five dimensions five levels questionnaire, EuroQoL VAS, SF36 and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the DSM) were evaluated 6 months after the enrollment. Results Among 80 patients who were alive, 71 (89%) completed the follow-up: 35 had received helmet NIV, 36 high-flow oxygen. There was no inter-group difference in any item concerning vital signs (N = 4), physical performance (N = 18), respiratory function (N = 27), quality of life (N = 21) and laboratory tests (N = 15). Arthralgia was significantly lower in the helmet group (16% vs. 55%, p = 0.002). Fifty-two percent of patients in helmet group vs. 63% of patients in high-flow group had diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide < 80% of predicted (p = 0.44); 13% vs. 22% had forced vital capacity < 80% of predicted (p = 0.51). Both groups reported similar degree of pain (p = 0.81) and anxiety (p = 0.81) at the EQ-5D-5L test; the EQ-VAS score was similar in the two groups (p = 0.27). Compared to patients who successfully avoided invasive mechanical ventilation (54/71, 76%), intubated patients (17/71, 24%) had significantly worse pulmonary function (median diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide 66% [Interquartile range: 47–77] of predicted vs. 80% [71–88], p = 0.005) and decreased quality of life (EQ-VAS: 70 [53–70] vs. 80 [70–83], p = 0.01). Conclusions In patients with COVID-19 hypoxemic respiratory failure, treatment with helmet NIV or high-flow oxygen yielded similar quality of life and functional outcome at 6 months. The need for invasive mechanical ventilation was associated with worse outcomes. These data indicate that helmet NIV, as applied in the HENIVOT trial, can be safely used in hypoxemic patients. Trial registration Registered on clinicaltrials.gov NCT04502576 on August 6, 2020
first_indexed 2024-03-13T10:17:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-af4603919fc24955b87e9e688943ff75
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2052-0492
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T10:17:03Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Intensive Care
spelling doaj.art-af4603919fc24955b87e9e688943ff752023-05-21T11:09:58ZengBMCJournal of Intensive Care2052-04922023-05-0111111410.1186/s40560-023-00669-0Long-term outcome of COVID-19 patients treated with helmet noninvasive ventilation vs. high-flow nasal oxygen: a randomized trialTeresa Michi0Chiara Mattana1Luca S. Menga2Maria Grazia Bocci3Melania Cesarano4Tommaso Rosà5Maria Rosaria Gualano6Jonathan Montomoli7Savino Spadaro8Matteo Tosato9Elisabetta Rota10Francesco Landi11Salvatore L. Cutuli12Eloisa S. Tanzarella13Gabriele Pintaudi14Edoardo Piervincenzi15Giuseppe Bello16Tommaso Tonetti17Paola Rucci18Gennaro De Pascale19Salvatore M. Maggiore20Domenico Luca Grieco21Giorgio Conti22Massimo Antonelli23for the Gemelli COVID-ICU study groupDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.Go F. VitoDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.Go F. VitoDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.Go F. VitoDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.Go F. VitoDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.Go F. VitoDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.Go F. VitoDepartment of Hygiene and Public Health, UniCamillus UniversityDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Infermi HospitalDepartment of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Arcispedale Sant’Anna, University of FerraraGeriatrics Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCSGeriatrics Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCSGeriatrics Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCSDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.Go F. VitoDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.Go F. VitoDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.Go F. VitoDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.Go F. VitoDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.Go F. VitoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, Policlinico Di Sant’Orsola, Università Di BolognaDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, Alma Mater Studiorum-Università Di BolognaDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.Go F. VitoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine and Emergency, SS. Annunziata HospitalDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.Go F. VitoDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.Go F. VitoDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.Go F. VitoAbstract Background Long-term outcomes of patients treated with helmet noninvasive ventilation (NIV) are unknown: safety concerns regarding the risk of patient self-inflicted lung injury and delayed intubation exist when NIV is applied in hypoxemic patients. We assessed the 6-month outcome of patients who received helmet NIV or high-flow nasal oxygen for COVID-19 hypoxemic respiratory failure. Methods In this prespecified analysis of a randomized trial of helmet NIV versus high-flow nasal oxygen (HENIVOT), clinical status, physical performance (6-min-walking-test and 30-s chair stand test), respiratory function and quality of life (EuroQoL five dimensions five levels questionnaire, EuroQoL VAS, SF36 and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the DSM) were evaluated 6 months after the enrollment. Results Among 80 patients who were alive, 71 (89%) completed the follow-up: 35 had received helmet NIV, 36 high-flow oxygen. There was no inter-group difference in any item concerning vital signs (N = 4), physical performance (N = 18), respiratory function (N = 27), quality of life (N = 21) and laboratory tests (N = 15). Arthralgia was significantly lower in the helmet group (16% vs. 55%, p = 0.002). Fifty-two percent of patients in helmet group vs. 63% of patients in high-flow group had diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide < 80% of predicted (p = 0.44); 13% vs. 22% had forced vital capacity < 80% of predicted (p = 0.51). Both groups reported similar degree of pain (p = 0.81) and anxiety (p = 0.81) at the EQ-5D-5L test; the EQ-VAS score was similar in the two groups (p = 0.27). Compared to patients who successfully avoided invasive mechanical ventilation (54/71, 76%), intubated patients (17/71, 24%) had significantly worse pulmonary function (median diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide 66% [Interquartile range: 47–77] of predicted vs. 80% [71–88], p = 0.005) and decreased quality of life (EQ-VAS: 70 [53–70] vs. 80 [70–83], p = 0.01). Conclusions In patients with COVID-19 hypoxemic respiratory failure, treatment with helmet NIV or high-flow oxygen yielded similar quality of life and functional outcome at 6 months. The need for invasive mechanical ventilation was associated with worse outcomes. These data indicate that helmet NIV, as applied in the HENIVOT trial, can be safely used in hypoxemic patients. Trial registration Registered on clinicaltrials.gov NCT04502576 on August 6, 2020https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00669-0COVID-19Noninvasive ventilationHelmetHigh-flow nasal oxygenAcute respiratory failurePatient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI)
spellingShingle Teresa Michi
Chiara Mattana
Luca S. Menga
Maria Grazia Bocci
Melania Cesarano
Tommaso Rosà
Maria Rosaria Gualano
Jonathan Montomoli
Savino Spadaro
Matteo Tosato
Elisabetta Rota
Francesco Landi
Salvatore L. Cutuli
Eloisa S. Tanzarella
Gabriele Pintaudi
Edoardo Piervincenzi
Giuseppe Bello
Tommaso Tonetti
Paola Rucci
Gennaro De Pascale
Salvatore M. Maggiore
Domenico Luca Grieco
Giorgio Conti
Massimo Antonelli
for the Gemelli COVID-ICU study group
Long-term outcome of COVID-19 patients treated with helmet noninvasive ventilation vs. high-flow nasal oxygen: a randomized trial
Journal of Intensive Care
COVID-19
Noninvasive ventilation
Helmet
High-flow nasal oxygen
Acute respiratory failure
Patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI)
title Long-term outcome of COVID-19 patients treated with helmet noninvasive ventilation vs. high-flow nasal oxygen: a randomized trial
title_full Long-term outcome of COVID-19 patients treated with helmet noninvasive ventilation vs. high-flow nasal oxygen: a randomized trial
title_fullStr Long-term outcome of COVID-19 patients treated with helmet noninvasive ventilation vs. high-flow nasal oxygen: a randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Long-term outcome of COVID-19 patients treated with helmet noninvasive ventilation vs. high-flow nasal oxygen: a randomized trial
title_short Long-term outcome of COVID-19 patients treated with helmet noninvasive ventilation vs. high-flow nasal oxygen: a randomized trial
title_sort long term outcome of covid 19 patients treated with helmet noninvasive ventilation vs high flow nasal oxygen a randomized trial
topic COVID-19
Noninvasive ventilation
Helmet
High-flow nasal oxygen
Acute respiratory failure
Patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI)
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00669-0
work_keys_str_mv AT teresamichi longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT chiaramattana longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT lucasmenga longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT mariagraziabocci longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT melaniacesarano longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT tommasorosa longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT mariarosariagualano longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT jonathanmontomoli longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT savinospadaro longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT matteotosato longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT elisabettarota longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT francescolandi longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT salvatorelcutuli longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT eloisastanzarella longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT gabrielepintaudi longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT edoardopiervincenzi longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT giuseppebello longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT tommasotonetti longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT paolarucci longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT gennarodepascale longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT salvatoremmaggiore longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT domenicolucagrieco longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT giorgioconti longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT massimoantonelli longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial
AT forthegemellicovidicustudygroup longtermoutcomeofcovid19patientstreatedwithhelmetnoninvasiveventilationvshighflownasaloxygenarandomizedtrial