Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial compartment and patellofemoral osteoarthritis

Background: Interest in bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA) for the treatment of medial patellofemoral osteoarthritis (MPFOA) has grown in recent years because BKA offers a bone and ligament-preserving alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). BKA only resurfaces the diseased compartments, w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sahil Kooner, MD, Herman Johal, MD, MPH, PhD(c), FRCSC, Marcia Clark, MD, MSc, FRCSC
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-12-01
Series:Arthroplasty Today
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344117300237
_version_ 1823929138201755648
author Sahil Kooner, MD
Herman Johal, MD, MPH, PhD(c), FRCSC
Marcia Clark, MD, MSc, FRCSC
author_facet Sahil Kooner, MD
Herman Johal, MD, MPH, PhD(c), FRCSC
Marcia Clark, MD, MSc, FRCSC
author_sort Sahil Kooner, MD
collection DOAJ
description Background: Interest in bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA) for the treatment of medial patellofemoral osteoarthritis (MPFOA) has grown in recent years because BKA offers a bone and ligament-preserving alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). BKA only resurfaces the diseased compartments, while preserving proprioception and native knee kinematics. Therefore, the objective of this study is to assess knee function, perioperative morbidity, and implant survivability in patients undergoing BKA vs TKA for MPFOA. Methods: The databases MEDLINE, PUBMED, and EMBASE were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized comparative studies comparing BKA with TKA for the treatment of MPFOA were included for further analysis. The primary outcome of interest was knee function. Secondary outcomes included range of movement, operation length, intraoperative blood loss, hospital length of stay, postoperative complications, and rate of revision length. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Meta-analysis was performed by pooling the results of the selected studies when possible. Results: Six studies were selected for inclusion (4 prospective studies and 2 retrospective cohort studies). In total, 274 patients and 277 knees were included for analysis. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups at any time points in terms of knee function, length of stay, complication rate, or revision rate, when monolithic BKA designs were controlled for. BKA did result in significantly decreased intraoperative blood loss, at the expense of increased operative length compared with TKA. Conclusions: The use of modular BKA for MPFOA is comparable with TKA in terms of short-term function, complication rate, and revision rate. BKA reduces intraoperative blood losses, but it is also more technically demanding, resulting in increased operation length. The use of modular BKA has acceptable short-term outcomes, but more long-term data are needed before it can be recommended for routine use in the treatment of MPFOA. The selection of modular BKA should be determined on a patient-specific basis. Currently, there is no evidence to suggest the use of monolithic BKA designs because of their high revision and failure rate. Keywords: Total knee arthroplasty, Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty, Medial patellofemoral arthritis, Meta-analysis
first_indexed 2024-12-16T21:04:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-af4cdbf25a7343d58b23768d88490018
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-3441
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T21:04:44Z
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Arthroplasty Today
spelling doaj.art-af4cdbf25a7343d58b23768d884900182022-12-21T22:16:20ZengElsevierArthroplasty Today2352-34412017-12-0134309314Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial compartment and patellofemoral osteoarthritisSahil Kooner, MD0Herman Johal, MD, MPH, PhD(c), FRCSC1Marcia Clark, MD, MSc, FRCSC2Department of Orthopedics, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Corresponding author. Department of Orthopedics, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29 Street NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada. Tel.: +1 403 629 8448.Center for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics, Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Orthopedics, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaBackground: Interest in bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA) for the treatment of medial patellofemoral osteoarthritis (MPFOA) has grown in recent years because BKA offers a bone and ligament-preserving alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). BKA only resurfaces the diseased compartments, while preserving proprioception and native knee kinematics. Therefore, the objective of this study is to assess knee function, perioperative morbidity, and implant survivability in patients undergoing BKA vs TKA for MPFOA. Methods: The databases MEDLINE, PUBMED, and EMBASE were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized comparative studies comparing BKA with TKA for the treatment of MPFOA were included for further analysis. The primary outcome of interest was knee function. Secondary outcomes included range of movement, operation length, intraoperative blood loss, hospital length of stay, postoperative complications, and rate of revision length. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Meta-analysis was performed by pooling the results of the selected studies when possible. Results: Six studies were selected for inclusion (4 prospective studies and 2 retrospective cohort studies). In total, 274 patients and 277 knees were included for analysis. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups at any time points in terms of knee function, length of stay, complication rate, or revision rate, when monolithic BKA designs were controlled for. BKA did result in significantly decreased intraoperative blood loss, at the expense of increased operative length compared with TKA. Conclusions: The use of modular BKA for MPFOA is comparable with TKA in terms of short-term function, complication rate, and revision rate. BKA reduces intraoperative blood losses, but it is also more technically demanding, resulting in increased operation length. The use of modular BKA has acceptable short-term outcomes, but more long-term data are needed before it can be recommended for routine use in the treatment of MPFOA. The selection of modular BKA should be determined on a patient-specific basis. Currently, there is no evidence to suggest the use of monolithic BKA designs because of their high revision and failure rate. Keywords: Total knee arthroplasty, Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty, Medial patellofemoral arthritis, Meta-analysishttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344117300237
spellingShingle Sahil Kooner, MD
Herman Johal, MD, MPH, PhD(c), FRCSC
Marcia Clark, MD, MSc, FRCSC
Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial compartment and patellofemoral osteoarthritis
Arthroplasty Today
title Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial compartment and patellofemoral osteoarthritis
title_full Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial compartment and patellofemoral osteoarthritis
title_fullStr Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial compartment and patellofemoral osteoarthritis
title_full_unstemmed Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial compartment and patellofemoral osteoarthritis
title_short Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial compartment and patellofemoral osteoarthritis
title_sort bicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial compartment and patellofemoral osteoarthritis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344117300237
work_keys_str_mv AT sahilkoonermd bicompartmentalkneearthroplastyvstotalkneearthroplastyforthetreatmentofmedialcompartmentandpatellofemoralosteoarthritis
AT hermanjohalmdmphphdcfrcsc bicompartmentalkneearthroplastyvstotalkneearthroplastyforthetreatmentofmedialcompartmentandpatellofemoralosteoarthritis
AT marciaclarkmdmscfrcsc bicompartmentalkneearthroplastyvstotalkneearthroplastyforthetreatmentofmedialcompartmentandpatellofemoralosteoarthritis