Similarity and variability of blocked weather-regime dynamics in the Atlantic–European region

<p>Weather regimes govern an important part of the sub-seasonal variability of the mid-latitude circulation. Due to their role in weather extremes and atmospheric predictability, regimes that feature a blocking anticyclone are of particular interest. This study investigates the dynamics of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. Teubler, M. Riemer, C. Polster, C. M. Grams, S. Hauser, V. Wirth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2023-04-01
Series:Weather and Climate Dynamics
Online Access:https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/4/265/2023/wcd-4-265-2023.pdf
_version_ 1797852607197216768
author F. Teubler
M. Riemer
C. Polster
C. M. Grams
S. Hauser
V. Wirth
author_facet F. Teubler
M. Riemer
C. Polster
C. M. Grams
S. Hauser
V. Wirth
author_sort F. Teubler
collection DOAJ
description <p>Weather regimes govern an important part of the sub-seasonal variability of the mid-latitude circulation. Due to their role in weather extremes and atmospheric predictability, regimes that feature a blocking anticyclone are of particular interest. This study investigates the dynamics of these “blocked” regimes in the North Atlantic–European region from a year-round perspective. For a comprehensive diagnostic, wave activity concepts and a piecewise potential vorticity (PV) tendency framework are combined. The latter essentially quantifies the well-established PV perspective of mid-latitude dynamics. The four blocked regimes (namely Atlantic ridge, European blocking, Scandinavian blocking, and Greenland blocking) during the 1979–2021 period of ERA5 reanalysis are considered.</p> <p>Wave activity characteristics exhibit distinct differences between blocked regimes. After regime onset, Greenland blocking is associated with a suppression of wave activity flux, whereas Atlantic ridge and European blocking are associated with a northward deflection of the flux without a clear net change. During onset, the envelope of Rossby wave activity retracts upstream for Greenland blocking, whereas the envelope extends downstream for Atlantic ridge and European blocking. Scandinavian blocking exhibits intermediate wave activity characteristics. From the perspective of piecewise PV tendencies projected onto the respective regime pattern, the dynamics that govern regime onset exhibit a large degree of similarity: linear Rossby wave dynamics and nonlinear eddy PV fluxes dominate and are of approximately equal relative importance, whereas baroclinic coupling and divergent amplification make minor contributions. Most strikingly, all blocked regimes exhibit very similar (intra-regime) variability: a retrograde and an upstream pathway to regime onset. The retrograde pathway is dominated by nonlinear PV eddy fluxes, whereas the upstream pathway is dominated by linear Rossby wave dynamics. Importantly, there is a large degree of cancellation between the two pathways for some of the mechanisms before regime onset. The physical meaning of a regime-mean perspective before onset can thus be severely limited.</p> <p>Implications of our results for understanding predictability of blocked regimes are discussed. Further discussed are the limitations of projected tendencies in capturing the importance of moist-baroclinic growth, which tends to occur in regions where the amplitude of the regime pattern, and thus the projection onto it, is small. Finally, it is stressed that this study investigates the variability of the governing dynamics without prior empirical stratification of data by season or by type of regime transition. It is demonstrated, however, that our dynamics-centered approach does <i>not</i> merely reflect variability that is associated with these factors. The main modes of dynamical variability revealed herein and the large similarity of the blocked regimes in exhibiting this variability are thus significant results.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-09T19:35:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-af51691ee03d475e8641b898551317e4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2698-4016
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T19:35:53Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Weather and Climate Dynamics
spelling doaj.art-af51691ee03d475e8641b898551317e42023-04-04T11:45:08ZengCopernicus PublicationsWeather and Climate Dynamics2698-40162023-04-01426528510.5194/wcd-4-265-2023Similarity and variability of blocked weather-regime dynamics in the Atlantic–European regionF. Teubler0M. Riemer1C. Polster2C. M. Grams3S. Hauser4V. Wirth5Institute for Atmospheric Physics, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, GermanyInstitute for Atmospheric Physics, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, GermanyInstitute for Atmospheric Physics, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, GermanyInstitute of Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK-TRO), Department Troposphere Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, GermanyInstitute of Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK-TRO), Department Troposphere Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, GermanyInstitute for Atmospheric Physics, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany<p>Weather regimes govern an important part of the sub-seasonal variability of the mid-latitude circulation. Due to their role in weather extremes and atmospheric predictability, regimes that feature a blocking anticyclone are of particular interest. This study investigates the dynamics of these “blocked” regimes in the North Atlantic–European region from a year-round perspective. For a comprehensive diagnostic, wave activity concepts and a piecewise potential vorticity (PV) tendency framework are combined. The latter essentially quantifies the well-established PV perspective of mid-latitude dynamics. The four blocked regimes (namely Atlantic ridge, European blocking, Scandinavian blocking, and Greenland blocking) during the 1979–2021 period of ERA5 reanalysis are considered.</p> <p>Wave activity characteristics exhibit distinct differences between blocked regimes. After regime onset, Greenland blocking is associated with a suppression of wave activity flux, whereas Atlantic ridge and European blocking are associated with a northward deflection of the flux without a clear net change. During onset, the envelope of Rossby wave activity retracts upstream for Greenland blocking, whereas the envelope extends downstream for Atlantic ridge and European blocking. Scandinavian blocking exhibits intermediate wave activity characteristics. From the perspective of piecewise PV tendencies projected onto the respective regime pattern, the dynamics that govern regime onset exhibit a large degree of similarity: linear Rossby wave dynamics and nonlinear eddy PV fluxes dominate and are of approximately equal relative importance, whereas baroclinic coupling and divergent amplification make minor contributions. Most strikingly, all blocked regimes exhibit very similar (intra-regime) variability: a retrograde and an upstream pathway to regime onset. The retrograde pathway is dominated by nonlinear PV eddy fluxes, whereas the upstream pathway is dominated by linear Rossby wave dynamics. Importantly, there is a large degree of cancellation between the two pathways for some of the mechanisms before regime onset. The physical meaning of a regime-mean perspective before onset can thus be severely limited.</p> <p>Implications of our results for understanding predictability of blocked regimes are discussed. Further discussed are the limitations of projected tendencies in capturing the importance of moist-baroclinic growth, which tends to occur in regions where the amplitude of the regime pattern, and thus the projection onto it, is small. Finally, it is stressed that this study investigates the variability of the governing dynamics without prior empirical stratification of data by season or by type of regime transition. It is demonstrated, however, that our dynamics-centered approach does <i>not</i> merely reflect variability that is associated with these factors. The main modes of dynamical variability revealed herein and the large similarity of the blocked regimes in exhibiting this variability are thus significant results.</p>https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/4/265/2023/wcd-4-265-2023.pdf
spellingShingle F. Teubler
M. Riemer
C. Polster
C. M. Grams
S. Hauser
V. Wirth
Similarity and variability of blocked weather-regime dynamics in the Atlantic–European region
Weather and Climate Dynamics
title Similarity and variability of blocked weather-regime dynamics in the Atlantic–European region
title_full Similarity and variability of blocked weather-regime dynamics in the Atlantic–European region
title_fullStr Similarity and variability of blocked weather-regime dynamics in the Atlantic–European region
title_full_unstemmed Similarity and variability of blocked weather-regime dynamics in the Atlantic–European region
title_short Similarity and variability of blocked weather-regime dynamics in the Atlantic–European region
title_sort similarity and variability of blocked weather regime dynamics in the atlantic european region
url https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/4/265/2023/wcd-4-265-2023.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fteubler similarityandvariabilityofblockedweatherregimedynamicsintheatlanticeuropeanregion
AT mriemer similarityandvariabilityofblockedweatherregimedynamicsintheatlanticeuropeanregion
AT cpolster similarityandvariabilityofblockedweatherregimedynamicsintheatlanticeuropeanregion
AT cmgrams similarityandvariabilityofblockedweatherregimedynamicsintheatlanticeuropeanregion
AT shauser similarityandvariabilityofblockedweatherregimedynamicsintheatlanticeuropeanregion
AT vwirth similarityandvariabilityofblockedweatherregimedynamicsintheatlanticeuropeanregion