Mixed‐stock analysis using Rapture genotyping to evaluate stock‐specific exploitation of a walleye population despite weak genetic structure

Abstract Mixed‐stock analyses using genetic markers have informed fisheries management in cases where strong genetic differentiation occurs among local spawning populations, yet many fisheries are supported by multiple, weakly differentiated stocks. Freshwater fisheries exemplify this problem, with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter T. Euclide, Tom MacDougall, Jason M. Robinson, Matthew D. Faust, Chris C. Wilson, Kuan‐Yu Chen, Elizabeth A. Marschall, Wesley Larson, Stuart Ludsin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-05-01
Series:Evolutionary Applications
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13209
_version_ 1819081294588411904
author Peter T. Euclide
Tom MacDougall
Jason M. Robinson
Matthew D. Faust
Chris C. Wilson
Kuan‐Yu Chen
Elizabeth A. Marschall
Wesley Larson
Stuart Ludsin
author_facet Peter T. Euclide
Tom MacDougall
Jason M. Robinson
Matthew D. Faust
Chris C. Wilson
Kuan‐Yu Chen
Elizabeth A. Marschall
Wesley Larson
Stuart Ludsin
author_sort Peter T. Euclide
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Mixed‐stock analyses using genetic markers have informed fisheries management in cases where strong genetic differentiation occurs among local spawning populations, yet many fisheries are supported by multiple, weakly differentiated stocks. Freshwater fisheries exemplify this problem, with many populations supported by multiple stocks of young evolutionary age and isolated across small spatial scales. Consequently, attempts to conduct genetic mixed‐stock analyses of inland fisheries have often been unsuccessful. Advances in genomic sequencing offer the ability to discriminate among populations with weak population structure, providing the necessary resolution to conduct mixed‐stock assignment among previously indistinguishable stocks. We used genomic data to conduct a mixed‐stock analysis of eastern Lake Erie's commercial and recreational walleye (Sander vitreus) fisheries and estimate the relative harvest of weakly differentiated stocks (pairwise FST < 0.01). Using RAD‐capture (Rapture), we sequenced and genotyped individuals from western and eastern basin local spawning stocks at 12,081 loci with 95% reassignment accuracy, which was not possible in the past using microsatellite markers. A baseline assessment of 395 walleye from 11 spawning stocks identified three reporting groups and refined previous assessments of gene flow among walleye stocks. Genetic assignment of 1,075 walleye harvested in eastern Lake Erie's recreational and commercial fisheries indicated that western basin stocks constituted the majority of harvest during the peak walleye fishing season (July–September), whereas eastern basin individuals comprised much of the early season harvest (May–June). Clear spatial structure in harvest composition existed; catches in more easterly sites contained more individuals of eastern basin origin than did more westerly sites. Our study provides important stock contribution estimates for Lake Erie fishery management and demonstrates the utility of genomic data to facilitate mixed‐stock analysis in exploited fish populations having weak population structure or limited existing genetic resources.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T19:58:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-af56fe1fe53e4015b0b2fc8d10e7ef4f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1752-4571
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T19:58:30Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Evolutionary Applications
spelling doaj.art-af56fe1fe53e4015b0b2fc8d10e7ef4f2022-12-21T18:52:02ZengWileyEvolutionary Applications1752-45712021-05-011451403142010.1111/eva.13209Mixed‐stock analysis using Rapture genotyping to evaluate stock‐specific exploitation of a walleye population despite weak genetic structurePeter T. Euclide0Tom MacDougall1Jason M. Robinson2Matthew D. Faust3Chris C. Wilson4Kuan‐Yu Chen5Elizabeth A. Marschall6Wesley Larson7Stuart Ludsin8Wisconsin Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin‐Stevens Point Stevens Point WI USALake Erie Management Unit Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Port Dover ON CanadaLake Erie Fisheries Research Unit New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Dunkirk NY USADivision of Wildlife, Sandusky Fisheries Research Station Ohio Department of Natural Resources Sandusky OH USAAquatic Research and Monitoring Section Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Peterborough ON CanadaAquatic Ecology Laboratory, Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology The Ohio State University Columbus OH USAAquatic Ecology Laboratory, Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology The Ohio State University Columbus OH USAU.S. Geological Survey, Wisconsin Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, College of Natural Resources University of Wisconsin‐Stevens Point Stevens Point WI USAAquatic Ecology Laboratory, Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology The Ohio State University Columbus OH USAAbstract Mixed‐stock analyses using genetic markers have informed fisheries management in cases where strong genetic differentiation occurs among local spawning populations, yet many fisheries are supported by multiple, weakly differentiated stocks. Freshwater fisheries exemplify this problem, with many populations supported by multiple stocks of young evolutionary age and isolated across small spatial scales. Consequently, attempts to conduct genetic mixed‐stock analyses of inland fisheries have often been unsuccessful. Advances in genomic sequencing offer the ability to discriminate among populations with weak population structure, providing the necessary resolution to conduct mixed‐stock assignment among previously indistinguishable stocks. We used genomic data to conduct a mixed‐stock analysis of eastern Lake Erie's commercial and recreational walleye (Sander vitreus) fisheries and estimate the relative harvest of weakly differentiated stocks (pairwise FST < 0.01). Using RAD‐capture (Rapture), we sequenced and genotyped individuals from western and eastern basin local spawning stocks at 12,081 loci with 95% reassignment accuracy, which was not possible in the past using microsatellite markers. A baseline assessment of 395 walleye from 11 spawning stocks identified three reporting groups and refined previous assessments of gene flow among walleye stocks. Genetic assignment of 1,075 walleye harvested in eastern Lake Erie's recreational and commercial fisheries indicated that western basin stocks constituted the majority of harvest during the peak walleye fishing season (July–September), whereas eastern basin individuals comprised much of the early season harvest (May–June). Clear spatial structure in harvest composition existed; catches in more easterly sites contained more individuals of eastern basin origin than did more westerly sites. Our study provides important stock contribution estimates for Lake Erie fishery management and demonstrates the utility of genomic data to facilitate mixed‐stock analysis in exploited fish populations having weak population structure or limited existing genetic resources.https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13209genetic stock identificationfisheries managementGreat LakesPortfolio theoryRAD‐captureRAD‐seq
spellingShingle Peter T. Euclide
Tom MacDougall
Jason M. Robinson
Matthew D. Faust
Chris C. Wilson
Kuan‐Yu Chen
Elizabeth A. Marschall
Wesley Larson
Stuart Ludsin
Mixed‐stock analysis using Rapture genotyping to evaluate stock‐specific exploitation of a walleye population despite weak genetic structure
Evolutionary Applications
genetic stock identification
fisheries management
Great Lakes
Portfolio theory
RAD‐capture
RAD‐seq
title Mixed‐stock analysis using Rapture genotyping to evaluate stock‐specific exploitation of a walleye population despite weak genetic structure
title_full Mixed‐stock analysis using Rapture genotyping to evaluate stock‐specific exploitation of a walleye population despite weak genetic structure
title_fullStr Mixed‐stock analysis using Rapture genotyping to evaluate stock‐specific exploitation of a walleye population despite weak genetic structure
title_full_unstemmed Mixed‐stock analysis using Rapture genotyping to evaluate stock‐specific exploitation of a walleye population despite weak genetic structure
title_short Mixed‐stock analysis using Rapture genotyping to evaluate stock‐specific exploitation of a walleye population despite weak genetic structure
title_sort mixed stock analysis using rapture genotyping to evaluate stock specific exploitation of a walleye population despite weak genetic structure
topic genetic stock identification
fisheries management
Great Lakes
Portfolio theory
RAD‐capture
RAD‐seq
url https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13209
work_keys_str_mv AT peterteuclide mixedstockanalysisusingrapturegenotypingtoevaluatestockspecificexploitationofawalleyepopulationdespiteweakgeneticstructure
AT tommacdougall mixedstockanalysisusingrapturegenotypingtoevaluatestockspecificexploitationofawalleyepopulationdespiteweakgeneticstructure
AT jasonmrobinson mixedstockanalysisusingrapturegenotypingtoevaluatestockspecificexploitationofawalleyepopulationdespiteweakgeneticstructure
AT matthewdfaust mixedstockanalysisusingrapturegenotypingtoevaluatestockspecificexploitationofawalleyepopulationdespiteweakgeneticstructure
AT chriscwilson mixedstockanalysisusingrapturegenotypingtoevaluatestockspecificexploitationofawalleyepopulationdespiteweakgeneticstructure
AT kuanyuchen mixedstockanalysisusingrapturegenotypingtoevaluatestockspecificexploitationofawalleyepopulationdespiteweakgeneticstructure
AT elizabethamarschall mixedstockanalysisusingrapturegenotypingtoevaluatestockspecificexploitationofawalleyepopulationdespiteweakgeneticstructure
AT wesleylarson mixedstockanalysisusingrapturegenotypingtoevaluatestockspecificexploitationofawalleyepopulationdespiteweakgeneticstructure
AT stuartludsin mixedstockanalysisusingrapturegenotypingtoevaluatestockspecificexploitationofawalleyepopulationdespiteweakgeneticstructure